Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Despite Ark. loss, progressives say Lincoln runoff sent warning to incumbent Democrats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 08:48 PM
Original message
Despite Ark. loss, progressives say Lincoln runoff sent warning to incumbent Democrats
Despite Ark. loss, progressives say Lincoln runoff sent warning to incumbent Democrats

By Philip Rucker and Peter Slevin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, June 9, 2010; 11:52 AM


Lincoln's win stunned labor and progressive leaders. But regardless, they said every penny spent to support Halter was worth it. Forcing Lincoln into a race for survival, they said, demonstrated to other moderate Democrats in the country that support from the party's liberal base cannot be taken for granted.

"The calculus has shifted," said Ilyse Hogue, the political advocacy director of the liberal advocacy group MoveOn, whose members helped bankroll Halter's campaign. "The message is out there for all sitting Democrats that their seats are not safe unless they're willing to show some fight on behalf of working families."

Steve Rosenthal, a veteran labor organizer who was a key strategist in the campaign against Lincoln, said forcing her into a runoff and having Halter come within four percentage points of her on Tuesday was "a phenomenal victory."

"There are other senators sitting on Capitol Hill saying, 'I don't want to go through what Senator Lincoln went through,' and that's the important lesson," Rosenthal said. "The labor movement is about protecting rights and expanding rights for workers. As long as the labor movement is seen as spending its resources only to protect Democrats, it loses."

Some political observers in Arkansas agreed that the unions had a notable impact.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/09/AR2010060902882.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Neither of them had a chance to win the General Election
Halter or Lincoln. It was a complete waste of time and money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. BS
Booseman doesn't have that great of name recognition in the state...he's the rep in the first district...includes Bentonville, but he isn't beloved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do you think that Lincoln's opponent...
won't take note of how she 'won' the primary? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. well, he is a repuke
so I'm sure he took note.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cowman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Amazing
they're calling a loss a win. What a bunch of morons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. So we're "morons" now?
I thought we were "fucking retards"?

I really wish you DLC'ers would make up your mind about which insults you're going to throw at the people who built this goddamned party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cowman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm calling the idiots who say this is a win morons.
how do you call this a win? Halter LOST. Calling it a win means you, and I'm not saying you specifically, are morons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm not calling it a win for anybody.
Except maybe the admitted Republican. Boozer, or whatever the fuck his name is.

Halter didn't win, because he was robbed.

Blanche WalMart didn't win - she stole it.

The Democratic party sure as fuck didn't win. Neither did the people of Arkansas.

But the fact that she had to steal it, is in fact, evidence that this DLC crap isn't cutting it anymore. Not even in the goddamn armpit of the Bible Belt "where libruls can't win".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jester Messiah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. It's definitely not a win
The only silver lining is that Blanche had to spend up way more of her war-chest than she would have liked during the primary, and that's gonna hurt in the main event. Others like her will be cognizant of this and will pay more attention to their base, though it's still going to be a cost/benefit calculation.

It's not great, it's barely even good, but we've got to salvage what we can from this train wreck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. She didn't help herself with progressives by helping Mukowski with her amendment
today to stop the EPA from regulations needed for climate change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. they said the same thing when Ned Lamont lost
Edited on Thu Jun-10-10 08:39 AM by wyldwolf
It was a message, they declared, to Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden and others like them. But what would you expect them to say? That's politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. And if Connecticut had the same laws as nearly every other state
Lieberdouche would have been finished. He "won" the general election running on as a member of his own fictional one man party, with Republican votes.

Democrats voted for Lamont. In both the primary AND the general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. No, Dems split and some voted for Lieberman. I have lived in CT my whole life and
some Dems were still loyal to Lieberman for various reasons...like protecting the Sub contracts for Groton.

Lieberman has lost support of Dems and independents that helped him win in 2006, he will have a tough rode in 2012, thankfully. He only has the Rethugs left.

In Arkansas, the loyalty factor to Lincoln was smaller but the liberal netroots and Unions are less influential there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. they're saying it served a purpose
I agree. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Of course. That's why she was humiliatingly forced into a runoff in the first place.
n/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. And the words...
Closed polling places-will be attached to her name for the rest of her life.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Oh yeah. Nobody willing to accept that kind of money from special interests
is going to say no to any tactic that lets her retain the seat, even if it's crooked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Too true...
still it's a very sad thing to say about 'our' government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yesterday, before the election results., a professor (Pol Sci) said
Edited on Wed Jun-09-10 09:56 PM by OHdem10
the Unions went into this with a purpose. The purpose
was to put Democrats on notice. The Anchor asked --what
if they lose after spending all that money. The Professor
said that is not the point. The Unions are sending a message
and are fully aware they may lose. The message is the focus
for the Unions. This was 4 o'clockish in the pm before the election.

I would say in a Red, Right to work state look how well their
candidate did. By their measure, this is a victory.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I totally agree. Do Democrats really want to fight the Republicans on their own?
Who knows... some of the other supporters might stay out or reduce their support too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Stay Away From Colorado Primary... Barack Obama
Bill Clinton, Lanny Davis, Joe Biden.

Michael Bennet is not an incumbent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Bennett is legally the incumbent but perhaps Obama will learn
that helping the incumbent out is not worth it. Interfering in primaries does not help the Dem party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. We have not yet begun to fight.
Just wait till 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
25. The GOP is afraid of their base. The DNC is not
That is the problem. The GOP is afraid of the tea party and religious right. However the dems expect liberals and unions to just blindly support any democrat in any election.

So just the fact that $10 million for Halter that could've gone to blue dogs instead went to a primary from the left may force the DNC to become more liberal. If they want to avoid 'seeing $10 million flushed down the toilet' in their words they'd better push their incumbents to the left so they can avoid more expensive primary elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jester Messiah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Have you seen the GOP's base?
Scary doesn't half cover it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
27. i'll agree with that, guess billy boy still has coattails. did you
see how man black people they had on the stage behind her. man you hardly see that many blacks on stage at the bet awards. funny stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC