Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

And now, the next Nontroversy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 04:46 PM
Original message
And now, the next Nontroversy
AP Sources: Admin talked jobs with Romanoff

By PHILIP ELLIOTT, Associated Press Writer Philip Elliott, Associated Press Writer – 33 mins ago

WASHINGTON – Administration officials dangled the possibility of a job for former Colorado House Speaker Andrew Romanoff last year in hopes he would forgo a challenge to Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet, administration officials said Wednesday, just days after the White House admitted orchestrating a similar job offer in the Pennsylvania Senate race.

These officials declined to specify the job that was floated or the name of the administration official who approached Romanoff, and said no formal offer was ever made. They spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they were not cleared to discuss private conversations.

The episode follows a similar controversy in Pennsylvania, where the White House last year turned to former President Bill Clinton to suggest Rep. Joe Sestak back out of another primary in favor of an unpaid position on a federal advisory board.

Sestak declined the offer and defeated Sen. Arlen Specter late last month in the Democratic primary after disclosing the job discussions and highlighting it as evidence of his anti-establishment political credentials. He said last week he rejected Clinton's feeler in less than a minute.

<snip>


Yahoo News link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. They did it here in NY also
with Gillibrand. Many dems were told no primary. The WH has no right whatsoever to tell us who to choose, they should stay out of our affairs and leave it to primary voters. Illegal, no, but certainly not moral, not change we can believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. not illegal...but not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pyrzqxgl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh C'mon deals like this go on at every level in every election. It's nothing new!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. He has every right to be in those affairs.
As president he's the de facto leader of the party, like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Whatever...
"These officials declined to specify the job that was floated or the name of the administration official who approached Romanoff, and said no formal offer was ever made. They spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they were not cleared to discuss private conversations."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. It Helps to Remember the Following Axiom
When a Republican does it, it's good. When a Democrat does it, it's bad. And when Obama or Rahm does it, it's the evilest evil that ever eviled...

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. +1
It's only OK if you are republican. IOOKIYAR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. They have so many jobs to fill
Who is to say they weren't just trying to fill the jobs? And one person staying out of a primary doesn't really do much good if someone else steps up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. If the administration volunteered this information, it could not be
very incendiary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kucinich 2012 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, the guy that polled lower than Stephen Colbert.
Good luck with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC