Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Robert Gibbs reveals Obama so enraged over BP oil spill, he actually said 'Damn!'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:02 PM
Original message
"Robert Gibbs reveals Obama so enraged over BP oil spill, he actually said 'Damn!'
You had to admit, this IS just a little bit funny.

Robert Gibbs reveals Obama so enraged over BP oil spill, he actually said 'Damn!'

When it comes to the BP oil spill disaster, the White House press corps wants blood. The members want raw emotion.

They want President Obama to throw a tantrum worthy of being featured in a Coors Light commercial.

Think Dennis Green. Or Jim Mora. Or Herm Edwards.

They don't want Tom Landry or Tony Dungy. They want Ditka. Even better Hurricane Ditka.

You could tell that on Tuesday at the White House press briefing when human pinata Robert Gibbs was repeatedly....

...asked about President Obama's robotic or perhaps Vulcan-like response toward the oil spill.

"Have you seen the President enraged about this?" asked one reporter.

Throughout this process, absolutely," Gibbs responded.

"Do you think that that has come through to the American people?" the reporter followed.

"I think the American people are frustrated. I think the people of the Gulf are frustrated. I think the President is frustrated. I think the White House is frustrated. I don’t see how anybody could look at what’s happening in the Gulf and not be frustrated and heartbroken -- absolutely," Gibbs said.

Expect a follow-up? Yep. Don't say frustrated and heartbroken when the reporters are talking about rage. They aren't asking him to write a country song. They want to know about jugular-popping, chair-flinging across the Oval Office, Bobby Knight-like rage.

"You said earlier that the President is enraged. Is he enraged at BP specifically?" asked CBS reporter Chip Reid.

"I think he’s enraged at the time that it’s taken, yes," Gibbs answered. "I think he’s been enraged over the course of this, as I’ve discussed, about the fact that when you’re told something is fail-safe and it clearly isn’t, that that’s the cause for quite a bit of frustration."

There he goes again. Gibbs mentions the word "frustrated" but reporters want to know about rage. Shirt-tearing, Lou Ferrigno exploding, Christian Bale screaming RAGE.

"Frustration and rage are very different emotions, though," Reid followed. "I haven’t -- have we really seen rage from the President on this? I think most people would say no."

"I’ve seen rage from him, Chip. I have," Gibbs responded meekly, almost like he was wearing a bonnet next to Mary's little lamb.

And as you can imagine, it didn't work. No sale.

"Can you describe it?" an exasperated Reid pressed. "Does he yell and scream? What does he do?"

"He said -- he has been in a whole bunch of different meetings -- clenched jaw -- even in the midst of these briefings, saying everything has to be done," Gibbs said. "I think this was an anecdote shared last week, to plug the damn hole."

GASP!

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/06/robert-gibbs-says-obama-is-so-enraged-over-bp-oil-spill-he-said-the-word-damn.html



And then he turned into a crazy old white dude!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pres Obama turns into the Hulk!
"PLUG THE DAMN HOLE!!!":bounce::grr:

*chip reid still whining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama needs to demonstrate the same kind of rage that FDR had against the Economic Royalists
who drove the nation into the Great Depression. Obama didn't have that kind of rage against our modern caste of Economic Royalists from Wall Street and neither does he show it at one of the Princes of the Oil Industry, BP. I agree with George Lakoff who said recently that Obama is missing big opportunities to show the moral reasons why government regulation is necessary, but Obama would rather channel Ronnie Reagon instead of FDR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. First, he'd need to disagree with the economic royalists
A.k.a., "shrewd businessmen" as Obama has called them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. nail, hammer...
smack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. 100% Agreed -- Sadly at his core Obama is a pure blood Corporatist.
Edited on Wed Jun-02-10 12:02 AM by denimgirly
Shame...In the end BP will merely get a slap on the wrist and the American people will be stuck with the $1 trillion clean up, and no strong regulation will be put in place...and Obama will be happy for it. When it involves big money it is quite easy to know where Obama stands even if they keep stabbing him in the back he will stand by big money. BP's stock plunged yesterday but consider it a bargain right now because in about 3-4 months time they will be entirely recovered and possibly upticking to new highs on the lack of any real effective regulation.... i hope i am wrong but it just seems when money is involved Obama always sides with money interests (e.g. Healthcare reform, finance reform, wars)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. That's not Obama and it never will be. He doesn't show rage like we
know it! He's pissed. I can tell by the veins in his neck when he talks about BP & what they haven't done! The nedia has to earn that this man is NOT going to have enotional reactions like THEY WANT, he's going to be Barrac Obama, wether they like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. FDR had a HUGE "mandate" in the 1932 election.
He not only got a massive popular vote for himself, but also with democratic Congressmen and Senators. The midterm election of 1934 only strengthened it. He has full control of his own party until about 1938. Obama will have to proceed with much greater caution, but I think he'll "get there" but at his own speedand in his own manner.

When FDR appointed Joe Kennedy to head the SEC, he didn't "put a fox in charge of the chicken coop, he "set a thief to catch a thief" (his own words). And that's how it turned out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Roosevelt sounded calm and cool headed compared to most orrators of his time.
Think of William Jennings Bryan two decades earlier, or Huey Long, or Eugene Debs. Stylistically, FDR was the Obama of his time. And Obama has made the case for more government intervention, but you have to pay attention to what he actually says, as opposed to how some pundits portray him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Sorry, but I voted for the man because he WASN'T a rageaholic.
I don't need some sort of universal daddy figure as my commander-in-chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. No shit!
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think we all know what Biden said!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. heh ..... that would have been a good follow up q. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Was that "plug the goddamn mother f*cking hole?"
Joe has a way with...words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. Did they ask what his eyes looked like when he was angry?
The idiocy of the questions being asked by the press when there are serious issues going on is so infuriating. Someone fire this bunch of trivial high school girl gossips and replace them with intelligent reporters! Please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. It's too late for that. From now on expect them to get dumber and even more
superficial. I know you're going to ask. "Is that possible?". I'm afraid it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. I want to hear him say fuck.
Edited on Wed Jun-02-10 10:53 AM by Phx_Dem
:D

Just kidding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fugop Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
16. Holy crap
Did this actually happen like this? Was Reid honestly this much of an idiot? Is the LA Times actually writing as if this was a valid conversation to be having with the White House press secretary? SERIOUSLY?

Good God almighty. Our media is so ridiculously embarrassing. "Idiocracy" is becoming closer and closer to reality. Clearly, our media wants President Camacho.

Shit. I know shit's bad right now, with all that starving bullshit, and the dust storms, and we are running out of french fries and burrito coverings. But I got a solution! - President Camacho


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Spot on comparison. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. This is just silly. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riskpeace Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. The Gulf Coast region is being destroyed for generations.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laurel46 Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. The president was a professor and will not demonstrate
the type of behavior people want with childish out burst and name calling, this is not an acceptable way for adults to behave. I have lived and worked around the university for many years and Obama's behavior is unquestionably responsible and typical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. With two young kids at home, I would expect a lot of reflexive cussing.
At least he didn't call them cootie queens and lint lickers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC