Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ixtoc spill (1979), 160 feet below the surface, took 10 months to stop

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 04:30 PM
Original message
Ixtoc spill (1979), 160 feet below the surface, took 10 months to stop


In 1979, Less Complicated Oil Leak Took 10 Months To Stop

<...>

Thirty-one years later, we haven't come that far technologically with how we deal with underwater oil drilling spills. The Mexican company running the Ixtoc I rig attempted a slew of now-familiar remedies --- they pumped mud into the well, capped it with a metal "sombrero," shot lead balls into the well and drilled relief wells -- but it took 10 months to stop the leak even though the drilling was taking place just 160 feet below the surface.

The Deepwater Horizon, which blew on April 20, was drilling 5,000 feet underwater.

<...>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow! Thanks for the historical context, PS. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks I just shared with friends
I hope we can learn something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is truly scary for all of us--whether we live anywhere near the Gulf Coast or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyAndProud60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anyone else notice that Presidents lose re-election after these things? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I haven't seen it. But I can say...I doubt President's are affected too much by these things.
Mainly since they're not an oil company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. dude, try a little more subtle
:rofl:

you'll last if you aren't so obvious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. This may take 4 months instead of 9. I guess that is progress but we have not come
that far at all in 30 years, have we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Some trolls have unrec'd this to the point where my rec still has this at 0
Gotta have the corporate protectionists out there covering some Washington asses on this don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Crazy... my rec brought it up to 3, but it was 5 before i rec'd it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Finally a logical comparison. Although our technology and some back then are very different.
I's going to take a while to stop this non-sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. No not logical
They were able to burn a large portion of the oil from Ixtoc on the surface, right above the leak.

Most of the oil from Ixtoc did surface and was able to be cleaned up and recycled.
BP's oil is mainly entrained in the water below the surface due to the depth of release and the dispersant used.

The comparisons are not valid. And the gulf was severely harmed by Ixtoc. It has not 'recovered' from the damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. you are not the arbiter of logic
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes I am
Who the fuck are you to say I am not? Huh? Who the fuck are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. It's far more logical than comparing it to Wounded Knee or Iranian Missle Crisis. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. And 30 years later, there's STILL no better way of stopping a leak
Doesn't say much about the oil companies' ability to learn how to STOP oil wells from gushing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC