Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sanders Learns Of White House Plans To Kill Fed Audit In New York Times

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
t0dd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:20 PM
Original message
Sanders Learns Of White House Plans To Kill Fed Audit In New York Times
Source: TPM

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) keeps hearing from Rahm Emanuel about his proposal to force a comprehensive audit of the Federal Reserve. But the White House isn't calling to tell him about new plans to kill his amendment.

The White House is hoping to cobble together a separate proposal, to be offered as an alternative to Sanders' backers. The so called "side-by-side" would give them cover to vote down the Fed audit amendment, by offering them them a weaker plan to support.

But Sanders had to read about this plan in the newspaper.

"I read it in the New York Times," Sanders said this morning, after a floor vote on a separate amendment.

Quoth the Times: "he White House and the banking committee chairman, Senator Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut scrounging for ideas for a so-called side-by-side amendment -- an alternate proposal on the Fed that would give senators something to support while offering them cover to vote down the Sanders measure."

"We're going to do everything that we can to win this," Sanders said. "Sixty votes is in fact a pretty high hurdle, but we hope to do it."

Read more: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/05/dis-sanders-learns-of-white-house-plans-to-kill-fed-audit-in-new-york-times.php



What a disgrace this Administration is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. What happened to transparency in the government
that Obama promised us??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama's twelve-dimensional chess
he's got some slick moves. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. is this checkmate yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alllyingwhores Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. There's nothing dimensional about it...it's just plain, simple, straight-up DLC...
...lie to your face to get elected and then pretend that you really, really want to follow through with your campaign platform and promises...but you just can't because you have to be bi-F__KINpartisan

...or you just don't have enough votes

...or, oh yeah, you're F__KING OWNED corporate whores...that just don't really give a shit about the majority of people that elected you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Wrong,
it's Star Wars holo chess.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. My greatest disppointment with this admin has been just how OWNED by the finance industry they are
Edited on Thu May-06-10 12:26 PM by Mojambo
And it started early with the appointments of Rahm, Geithner, and Summers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yeah, they're the Three Stooges of Democracy. I'd rather have the ghosts of the real Stooges. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Well and concisely put. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. "What a disgrace this Administration is"
And at time when we so desperately needed to start fixing what Bush broke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
border_town Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:37 PM
Original message
YOU KNOW...
I wish I could say I am shockd but I'm not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned73 Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is a damn shame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. I've had a sinking feeling in my gut for ten years now. I thought it would go away.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Rahm & DLC are a cancer on the presidency
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. The prez chose both of them - his decision. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Change You Can Believe In! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. well...
if "can believe in" = "not surprised in the slightest", that's about right.

Things like this disappoint me, but don't surprise me. I knew that Obama was a very reserved and conservative guy wen I voted for him. I did it thinking that at least an Obama presidency wouldn't make matters worse. I've gotten no more and no less than that. Sure, I was hopeful that I was wrong and big changes would be made, but I haven't expected it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hey Mr. President - transparency my ass! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC