Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the GOP's Starve-the-Beast Strategy Is Suicide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 07:07 PM
Original message
Why the GOP's Starve-the-Beast Strategy Is Suicide
http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/when-the-starved-beast-bites-back


When the Starved Beast Bites Back
Republicans are trying to create a fiscal crisis they may not survive.


Ever since George W. Bush massively cut taxes back in 2001, squandering much of the $5.6 trillion, ten-year surplus he inherited from Bill Clinton, liberals have assumed that the fiscal game was rigged. Conservatives had been explicit about their starve-the-beast strategy—the practice of creating large deficits through tax cuts in order to force future spending cuts. By playing along, the thinking went, Democrats would only further enable irresponsible behavior—a bit like negotiating with terrorists. Why kill yourself balancing the budget, as Bill Clinton did, if the next Republican is just going to slash taxes again?

The fear of conservative high jinks persists to this day, which is one reason liberals have responded coolly to President Obama’s deficit-cutting commission. In fact, many suspect the right is up to something even more sinister—a “doubling down on starve-the-beast,” as Paul Krugman put it recently. “Depriving the government of revenue, it turns out, wasn’t enough to push politicians into dismantling the welfare state,” Krugman wrote. “So now the de facto strategy is to oppose any responsible action until we are in the midst of a fiscal catastrophe.”

Krugman is almost certainly onto something. I suspect, as he does, that Republicans believe precipitating a fiscal crisis will force Democrats to roll back entitlement spending (i.e., Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security), which would be both politically unpopular and the realization of the right’s dearest policy fantasy. It’s an altogether brilliant, if diabolical, plan. Except for one minor flaw: There’s a good chance it could vaporize the GOP.


The thing to keep in mind about economic crises is that parties who solve them tend to survive and even prosper over the long-term, even if they sometimes suffer short-term pain. Conversely, parties who fail to solve them tend to face political calamity. The case of Democrats and Republicans during the Great Depression is the most familiar example, but hardly the only one. In the last decade-and-a-half, persistent economic crises have sent ruling cliques and parties into the wilderness in Indonesia, Argentina, and Turkey. Even in Japan, which effectively had a one-party monopoly since the 1950s, the recurring economic problems of recent years have given the opposition DPJ a chance to govern. The failure of Democrats in the United States and Labour in Britain to address the economic sclerosis of the 1970s helped lay the groundwork for the conservative ascendance of the 1980s.

snip//

So, yes, like Krugman, I’m concerned that the Republican Party really might cast us into the abyss as part of some spectacularly misguided political strategy. But the one thing I’m emphatically not worried about is that it might somehow help the GOP.

Noam Scheiber is a senior editor of The New Republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Liberals arent opposed to Obama's deficit commission because
of a "fear of conservative high jinks", they oppose it because Obama is determined to be a conservative and seems willing to gut our safety net.

Democrats dont vote for their politicians to act like the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Baloney. Prove it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I will believe as I see fit without your bullying tactics
You prove Obama never said "everything is on the table".

Go ahead, try.

And when he follows through and our safety net has holes in it will you finally understand what he's doing, or will you continue excusing his every move?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Whaaa. Now I'm a bully. And you're a griper.

Guess what? I prefer to think Dems don't trust rethugs instead of my president due to his purported conservatism, which has hardly been proven. I guess we'll never see eye to eye on that one.

But you enjoy your complaining, spread the love!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. you make up the most amazing shit, you know that?
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. What is it about "everything on the table" that you don't understand?
:shrug:

You and the poster above obviously can't refute what was said- so instead you stick your heads in the sand about potential outcomes. Kinda sad, actually.

Not all that different from those on the other side if the aisle over the 9 years or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Gather ten liberals together, ask them about ten issues and...
...you will get 100 different answers.

No one is able to speak for all liberals. I am a liberal and I think government spending needs to be more closely monitored. I believe in fiscal restraint, real fiscal restraint though as opposed to scything one's way through a budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. The gops are stupid enough to try anything that doesn't involve
work. Wasn't that bushcheney's job to get that whole "abyss" thing started..they did their damnedest.

We have a President who learns from history..thankfully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. The welfare state survived the Reagan years
It just didn't get any bigger, and it actually got a bit bigger in the Bush II Administration with Medicare Part D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC