Taliban amnesty betrays US connivance with war criminals

[IndianaGreen]

Taliban amnesty betrays US connivance with war criminals

Coming on the heels of revelations that US contractors are paying the Taliban protection money and that the Taliban fight with captured US weapons

Bill Weinberg

A front-page New York Times story Nov. 28, "Afghans Offer Jobs to Taliban If They Defect," indicates that Hamid Karzai's government—presumably with Washington's support—is enlisting traditional tribal elders "to lure local fighters and commanders away from the Taliban by offering them jobs in development projects..." Note the "and commanders"—claims that the amnesty was just aimed at Taliban cannon fodder appear to have been the thin end of the wedge. The Canadian Press meanwhile reports that with the insurgency gaining ground—and a corrupt government unable to keep its promises—the amnesty effort is winning few former fighters. "The Taliban are getting stronger than they were before," said Haji Agha Lalai, a prominent Panjwaii district elder and former director of Kandahar's reconciliation program. "Also the government does not support us very well and we could not fulfill our promises to Taliban."

Coming on the heels of revelations that US contractors are paying the Taliban protection money and that the Taliban fight with captured US weapons, as well as a popular conspiracy theory in Afghanistan that the US is actively collaborating with the Taliban, this news recalls Karzai's 2007 amnesty for Mujahedeen fighters—including some of the bloodiest fundamentalist warlords. All these developments reveal the hypocrisy of US claims to be defending democracy, secularism and women's rights in Afghanistan.

Unfortunately, too many anti-war voices are openly encouraged at this betrayal of Afghanistan's women, ethnic minorities and other intended Taliban targets. For instance, the October issue of Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown enthuses:

Let's be clear. As a group, the Taliban is a nasty outfit—especially in its rigid and brutal subjugation of girls and women. But not every member or even every leader is barbaric thug, and the moderates are the ones we should be working with.

The typical song-and-dance: a lukewarm and perfunctory admission that the Taliban are a "nasty outfit" (how about "war criminals"?), followed by a call to "work with" their "moderates"—and not only foot-soldiers but "leaders."

Authentic Afghan voices for democracy, secularism and women's rights oppose the US/NATO occupation precisely because the US has connived with fundamentalist war criminals from the day it arrived in Afghanistan.

http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2009/11/29/taliban-amnesty-betrays-us-connivance-with-war-criminals.html

Do any of you remember the Northern Alliance? They were our allies in 2001-2002 against the Taliban. Here is a little something about their human rights record:

http://www.rawa.org/reports.htm

[ShortnFiery]

1. Excellent Points.

Here's some complimentary visuals to drive home some very uncomfortable truisms:

[IndianaGreen]

4. We should remind ourselves that Karzai reestablished the ministry of virtue that the Taliban had

and put an Islamic extremist in charge of it.

[avaistheone1]

2. Kicked and recommended

[David Zephyr]

3. K&R. Is it Hate Week or Love Week? The Enemy is our ally and our ally is our enemy.

What a ocean of shit Obama is directing our national ship into.