Concentration of Wealth = An Influence Lock On Our Politics

[natrat]

Fri Nov 27, 2009 at 12:00

Since the Reagan-era changes in the country's tax and regulation policies more and more of the wealth and income generated by our economy has been flowing upward to fewer and fewer people. We have now reached the point where wealth is at least as concentrated as it was in 1929. With similar consequences.

Just how concentrated is the wealth and income? The L-Curve website graphically illustrates the disparity. Here's how it works.

Picture a football field. Each of the 100 years is 1% of the population. At any point on the field you pile a stack of $100 bills to represent the income that a family in that percentile makes. So the median family income would be on the 50-yard line.

According to the site (old data), in 2005 the median family was approx. $40,000, and the stack of $100 bills would be about 1.6 inches high.

The family on the 95-yard line makes about $100K, a stack about 4 inches high.

99-yard line, $300K, about a foot high.

One foot line, top 1/3 of one percent, $1 million, 40 inches.

Now the slope of the graph starts to rise.

$1 billion is a stack 1 kilometer high. (Median family income was 1.6 inches.)

And then you start to get to the really rich. $10 billion is a stack the height of Mt. Everest.

The last few on the field have income representing a stack 15 kilometers high.

Two points:

1) This is old data. The concentration is greater now. The top incomes might not be as high this year.

2) The concentration of wealth is even greater than the concentration of income.

The societal consequences are dramatic. This happened as a result of wealth's ability to influence our country's decision-making. And that influence was used to increase the wealth of the influencers, which increased their influence. But this has come at the expense of regular people, whose incomes have stagnated, forcing them into increasing debt.

We have reached a breaking point where a consumer-based economy can no longer be sustained. But this has not led to any loosening of the grip that money has on our political system. If we don't force the political system out of that grip and restore democracy we will not be able to fix our economic system.


http://www.openleft.com/diary/16213/concentration-of-wealth-an-influence-lock-on-our-politics

[BeFree]

1. Powers That Be --PTB

That stack of money at the end of the field as high as Mt. Everest represents
the PTB. The few with all that money use that money to get whatever they want.

The PTB hate Unions because if the whole world made Union wages their stack
may only be as large as say Mt. Washington.

They do not want to share that money and power... they want it for themselves.

No president gets elected without their approval. Few congress people get elected without their approval.

Their influence is so great they are the Powers That Be.