Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Will Be Out Of Afghanistan By 2017

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 10:18 AM
Original message
U.S. Will Be Out Of Afghanistan By 2017
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States will not be in Afghanistan eight years from now, the White House said on Wednesday, as President Barack Obama prepared to explain to Americans next week why he is expanding the war effort.

After months of deliberation and fending off Republican charges that he was dithering on Afghanistan while violence there surged, Obama will address the nation on Tuesday on the way forward in the costly and unpopular eight-year war.

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/11/26/news/news-us-afghanistan-usa.html


Okay, here is confirmation from the New York Times that the US will be in Afghanistan at least seven years.

(rasputin, is there a thread somewhere that indicates what websites we can not quote from? I was surprised that thread was locked. It appears the information was good after all.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not if the White House is occupied by a republican after 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Probably not if the White House is occupied by a democrat after 2012 either.
We now have war mongers leading both parties in the U.S.

Afghanistan is a war and escalation of choice. Chosen by a Democrat by name of Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Obama's war may end earlier under the GOP
Since the antiwar vote will be up for grabs, and the country will be even closer to bankruptcy, there will be little to stop the GOP from becoming an isolationist, antiwar party by 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Oh fabulous----now we have a push for Republicans in office. Brilliant--I'm no longer at DU. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. No "push", just a forecast re: political consequences /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry. Just posted link to same article. Saw your post after I posted my link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. The OP headline is misleading as it's a total guess on the reporter's part. Surprise, surprise.
Edited on Thu Nov-26-09 10:26 AM by ClarkUSA
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yup the military have been leaking like a sieve their plans for the
escalation/war for days directly all over the media.

But you can be surprised if that makes you feel better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Okay then. Where in the article does the reporter quote "the military"?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Unless something unexpected happens before then...
It's the old, "give me credit for promising something, even though you won't get it until after I leave office, if at all" technique used by countless presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. So whoever is elected President in 2016 might bring our troops home. Yipeee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. That's should be about right!
You can bet that the last bit of natural gas will have been extracted and passed through the Afghan pipeline immediately before we pull out. America, it seems, has become nothing more than the muscle for global corporations to have their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. What is wrong with you MediaWhore Lovers? How does the title relate to what Gibbs said?!
This is why drama erupts on this thread. The title completely undermines and misrepresents Gibbs. Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Do the simple math vaberella. 2009 + 8 = 2017
Now that wasn't so hard, was it?

"We are in year nine of our efforts in Afghanistan. We are not going to be there another eight or nine years," Gibbs told reporters. "Our time there will be limited and that is important for people to understand," he said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. I already answered your crappy post. No where in his statement does he say BY or IN 8 or 9 years.
You are deciding on doing math based on two numbers in the post that aren't even stated as part of the withdrawal time period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. Senator Feingold on President Obama's Afghanistan war escalation

But members of the party's most liberal wing, such as Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.), have expressed serious doubts about the overall direction of the president's strategy.

"Devoting billions more dollars and tens of thousands more troops to Afghanistan is not likely to significantly improve conditions in that country, and it will not help -- and could even hurt -- our efforts to dismantle al-Qaeda's global network with safe havens in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, North Africa and elsewhere," Feingold said.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34160596/ns/politics-washington_post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
16. Hey, hey LBJ, how many kids have you killed today?
Here we go again down the path of war crimes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. LOL, will that be the bone toss???
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC