Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH: "today’s employment report contains encouraging signs of gradual labor market healing."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 10:36 AM
Original message
WH: "today’s employment report contains encouraging signs of gradual labor market healing."
Edited on Fri Feb-05-10 10:48 AM by Clio the Leo
On the Employment Situation in January
Posted by Christina Romer on February 5, 2010 at 9:30 AM EST

While unemployment remains a severe problem, today’s employment report contains encouraging signs of gradual labor market healing. The unemployment rate fell three-tenths of a percentage point and employment rose in a number of industries, though overall employment fell slightly.

The unemployment rate declined from 10.0 percent to 9.7 percent. This decline occurred despite a modest rise in the labor force. The broadest measure of the unemployment rate, which includes all persons marginally attached to the labor force and workers working part time for economic reasons, fell almost a full percentage point. Obviously, the unemployment rate remains unacceptably high, and is even worse for certain demographic groups such as teenagers and black or African American workers.

Overall payroll employment declined 20,000 in December. This total reflects substantial variation across industries. Employment in manufacturing rose for the first time since January 2007, led by an increase in employment in motor vehicles and parts. Employment also rose in retail trade and in temporary help employment. Employment fell, however, in construction and state and local government.

Even as today’s numbers contain signs of the beginning of recovery, they are also a reminder of how far we still have to go to return the economy to robust health and full employment. Indeed, with the benchmark revision announced today, we now know that the total job loss over the recession was more than 1 million larger than previously estimated. That is why at the same time that he released a plan for reining in the budget deficit over the medium and long run, the President has called on Congress to enact responsible, targeted actions to jump-start job creation. His proposals for a small business jobs and wages tax cut and a new program to encourage small business lending are important steps to help the businesses that are essential to robust job creation. Today’s numbers showing continued decline in construction and state and local government employment emphasize the importance of two other of the President’s priorities—continued infrastructure investment and additional aid for strapped state and local governments.

There will likely be bumps in the road ahead. The monthly employment and unemployment numbers are volatile and subject to substantial revision. Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative. It is essential that we continue our efforts to move in the right direction and replace job losses with robust job gains.



http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/02/05/employment-situation-january
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Pending upward revisions
Edited on Fri Feb-05-10 11:11 AM by Oregone
:)

Ive totally lost faith in the UE rate statistics (been years). Im not sure if its really a sound measure of the state of the economy, or even reflects any near-objective measurement of employment. Honestly, I don't know what is anymore. I guess I still have a job...this month (barely). Maybe thats all I should care about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is good news
And in the middle of winter, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. A fair assessment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. WTFudge? "...though overall employment fell slightly"
Edited on Fri Feb-05-10 11:33 AM by Kurt_and_Hunter
I softened the WTF because this isn't a huge deal, but this is not a good way to start a press release.

The WH shouldn't be endorsing the conclusions of both the household and payroll surveys when they say opposite things.

If "overall employment fell slightly" then the number wouldn't be 9.7%. (It would be 9.8 or 9.9... so many were dropped from the group of job-seekers it probably would still have gone down.)

The point is, the top-line number refutes the payroll survey figure so it's weird to simply accept both as true in the same paragraph. (The top-line number is based on a measure that said jobs increased by 110K, not lost 20K)

A member of the public reading that opening would have the very sensible reaction that she's being bamboozled.

Here's how I would have written this:
While unemployment remains a severe problem, today’s employment report contains encouraging signs of gradual labor market healing. Employment rose in a number of industries and the unemployment rate fell three-tenths of a percentage point. Though the data is mixed it appears that overall employment rose slightly in January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. unnn, the BLS is taking folk out of the sample pool again...this is mixed IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I agree with that, but
even accepting the report at face value it's weird to flattly accept the payroll survey as fact (-20K) while simultaneously promoting the household survey conclusion (+110K and 9.7% unemployment)

If unemployment is really 9.7% then we did not lose 20K net jobs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC