and using any distortion to try and make an ideological point.
Now here is the complete news conference with Leduc. In it there is no criticism of any particular action by the US military other than the frustration already discussed.
http://www.enewspf.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=13014:doctors-without-borders-teleconference-on-haiti-earthquake-january-18-2010&catid=88888993:haiti-earthquake&Itemid=88890263
Specifically on the delayed transport Leduc does not accuse the American military of acting in any kind of bad faith.
WSJ: So was the blame the US military not giving you the clearance to land, they control the aiport, or was it the cluster system that the UN put in place?
Benoit: Between the 2 systems I don’t think there is a smooth liaison in who decides what. It’s not clear to us, as I said before. Then yesterday we clearly had 2 planes diverted with cargo inside. People had been informed, I think the US were on the ground at the airport. The airspace, maybe I think it’s the Haitians but please confirm, because I think it’s changing all the time who is controlling. The planes didn’t land, and this was yesterday afternoon.
Avril: We have had 4 cargo flights that successfully have flown to Port-au-Prince, with a total tonnage of 135. We have 2 cargo flights that flew to Dominican Republic with their total tonnage being 65. At the moment we have 6 cargo flights planned for the rest of this week, with a total tonnage of 195
Now to the point of "militarizing aid" here is the complete quote. It shows that the key principle for the MSF is operational efficiency and that over rides all other concerns. The question of militarizing humanitarian aid is a general question that has long term questions but is not relevent to the immediate question of using what every agency is able to effect the quickest response.
Benoit:
. Then, it’s a more general question about the militarization of humanitarian (aid). You know, the military distributing food, and at the same time having a gun, it’s extremely confusing. It’s a constraint for us in places like Afghanistan, in Iraq, in all the areas where military staff are doing humanitarian action or at least perform such actions under that name. So this is something that we are concerned with in MSF in general. To come back to your question, for Haiti, I think for whoever controls the airport to facilitate planes that have the emergency and needed equipment - this is the first problem right now
And now here is the New York Times asking specfically about the military and security. He admits that he isn't in a good position to respond to the macro operational question - the basic point in my initial reply. If he wanted to criticize the US military he would have here. He does say that there is a complete absence of security forces on the street.
23:46 NYT: I have a couple of questions on the airport and on security. I ran your complaints by , who’s the head of logistics for peacekeeping. She said it’s just too small of an airport to handle the number of flights that come flooding in from all over the world, and they had to come up with a list of priorities, so they said water, food, and then medical equipment. While she conceded that your hospital is important, she said 24 hours to get to Santo Domingo, given the size of the airport, is not a terrible delay. I would wonder how you would react to that. Second, I heard they are beefing up police force, they have more police this morning, because they want these humanitarian deliveries to be guarded. Are you seeing problems? Do you think that’s a good idea, that they bring in extra 3,500 troops mostly to guard humanitarian convoys?
Benoit: I will repeat, we have 48 hour’s delay, so we are frustrated, we have doctors who have patients in some of the structures without the proper drugs or the equipment to perform the operations they need, it’s a fact. We are 2 days behind on the operations because of this access. Of course, it’s a small airport, of course there are a lot of planes, but then it’s clearly a matter of defining priorities. We have the staff on the ground, we have the structures missing some staff. It’s frustrating. Then, I’m not the best person to answer about the deployment. Of course, we just want the operations to go on. So, for the moment we don’t see a lot of either police, either UN in the streets, only in certain strategic places or roundabouts, but the streets are pretty empty of police, this is what I can say.
This shows clearly that WSWS and you have completely taken the MSF's comments about a general concern over the long term use of military in humanitarian aid and used it in the highly dramatic situation following the immediate collapse of infrastructure currently in Haiti. Leduc says it clearly:
First, we just want the aid operation to be efficient. So far I think we can gain in efficiency; it's needed. The misuse of MSF was simply a way of showing how the WSWS misuses sources and international organizations or anything to advance their ideology. Why they are accepted here is beyond me because they, and apparently you, are ideological enemies of the Democratic Party.
The basic point of the article, which you continue to avoid is that the use of the US military is a subterfuge to recolonize Haiti.
My son-in-law is Haitian and I can tell you that all Haitians are united in support of the US military helping in Haiti but don't take my word for it.
And here is the UN asking for additional troops because the deteriorating security situation is affecting the ability to get food out
UN wants more police and troops for Haiti
http://www.ctpost.com/default/article/UN-wants-more-police-and-troops-for-Haiti-326660.phpUNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. mission in Haiti wants 2,000 additional troops and 1,500 extra police to provide military escorts for aid convoys and ensure that desperately needed food and water is distributed to earthquake victims without any violence, U.N. officials said Monday.
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told the Security Council the U.N. needs to strengthen its current Haiti force, which has 7,000 military peacekeepers and 2,100 international police, to deal with the increasing demands on the world body following last week's earthquake.
The Security Council must lift the current ceiling for the force, and U.S. deputy ambassador Alejandro Wolff said he expects a U.S.-draft resolution to be unanimously approved on Tuesday.
U.N. peacekeeping chief Alain Le Roy said the extra soldiers are essential because of the "tremendous" number of requests to escort humanitarian convoys.
"We are stretched," he told reporters, saying the U.N. World Food Program alone is bringing in 60,000 tons of food quickly which must get to over 200 distribution points.
Le Roy said the U.N. also needs extra troops to secure the routes the convoys will be using, and for "a reserve force" in case the security situation deteriorates further.
The neighboring Dominican Republic has already offered an 800-strong battalion which will deploy later this week to secure the road from Port-au-Prince to the Dominican border, the only land bridge outside the battered country, he said.
France's U.N. Ambassador Gerard Araud said European Union foreign ministers agreed Monday to send an unspecified number of police.
Tex
"We have to act very quickly and very strongly," Araud said.
Le Roy cited the often unruly crowds at points where food and water is being distributed. He said the extra U.N. police officers will also help the Haitian police who are returning to the streets in "limited numbers."
The WSWS use of MSF quotes was completely dishonest.
Alleging that the US military involvement has any other agenda than the immediate security and humanitarian one is dishonest.
Ignoring that the United Nations is already involved militarily in the Haiti with its Peacekeeping and Stabilization force is dishonest.
The WSWS is a completely dishonest source of news as it is committed to its communist ideology. People who do not understand this and continue to use them here are either lavish lap dogs to its agenda, paid posters or dupes, take your choice.