Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former Senate Parliamentarian Calls GOP Strategy to Derail Reconciliation Effort 'Patently Absurd'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 07:03 PM
Original message
Former Senate Parliamentarian Calls GOP Strategy to Derail Reconciliation Effort 'Patently Absurd'
Emphasis mine.
Former Senate Parliamentarian Calls GOP Strategy To Derail Reconciliation Effort ‘Patently Absurd’

Earlier today, The Plum Line’s Greg Sargent reported that “the GOP Senate leadership has privately settled on a strategy to derail health reform if Dems try to pass the Senate bill with a fix through reconciliation.” Republicans are promising to “unleash an endless stream of amendments designed to stall for time and to force Dems to take untenable votes.” “There is no way to limit the number of amendments that are voted on. You can’t close debate. Democrats will have to vote on every politically perilous amendment that you can possibly think of,” the aid said.

But at least one former Senate parliamentarian is calling the strategy “patently absurd.” According to Robert Dove, who served as Senate parliamentarian until 2001, “In the Senate, the motion to go to that bill is not debatable, and the bill itself is only debatable for 20 hours. All amendments must be germane.” “If there are differences between the two houses in their reconciliation bills, then you would either work out those differences through a conference, or through amendments as they bounce back and forth,” Dove told Lester Feder, who has been covering health care policy for The Nation and the O’Neill institute’s health law blog.

Dove also revealed that Vice President Joe Biden, not the Senate parliamentarian, is “the ultimate decider” of “what can stay in under the rules“:

But no vice president has tried to play that role in reconciliation. We haven’t had vice presidents that have tried to play important procedural roles for a very long time. The last one was Nelson Rockefeller, in 1975, and before him Hubert Humphrey, in the 1960’s. But no vice president has ever tried to play a role in reconciliation. Basically, since Walter Mondale was vice president, they have kind of been co-opted by the president and given an office down in the West Wing. Their interest in playing Senate politics has become attenuated. That has left the Senate parliamentarian in an extremely powerful position.

Dove stressed that “reconciliation was never designed for something like health care” and pointed out that “It’s designed for deficit reduction, and therefore everything in a reconciliation bill must contribute to deficit reduction.” Of course, in 2001, Republicans broke from tradition and used the reconciliation process to pass President Bush’s budget busting tax cuts for the rich. As a new report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities points out, reconciliation has been used to pass major pieces of legislation in the past and, “since rising health costs are the single largest reason for projected long-run deficits, it is appropriate that health reform be considered through the reconciliation process.”

http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/01/26/reconciliation-derail/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. "We need more tax cuts for republicon fatcats!" - Republicons
Edited on Tue Jan-26-10 07:07 PM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Time for Joe to get involved...the President of the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. why would it be absurd when they've gotten everything they wanted before anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. who is the current parlimentarian in the Senate?
Why isn't s/he taking control of this mess?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. They haven't done anything yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. what do you mean?
There is no one running the day to day? They don't hold over from one session until the next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You asked why he/she isn't dealing with this. It's because they havne't done it yet.*
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Funny, that's what I call Judd Gregg himself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC