Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reuters versus Venanalysis versus Chavez, you decide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:47 PM
Original message
Reuters versus Venanalysis versus Chavez, you decide
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooVlAa3Y53s&feature=channel

"if the "oligarchy" is returned to the government, maybe I'll employ the tanks from the brigade..."


I'd say Reuters got it right and Venanalsys is spinning away feverishly. what a surprise!!!!!


ain't it a bitch when Chavez screws up your defense of him?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billy Burnett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. So, if a coup is staged with foreign gov support the military shouldn't defend the legitimate gov?
I don't get it. The military should just sit back and allow the legal government to be attacked and/or overthrown?

Considering the outcome of the last US gov supported coup of the legal Ven gov, I think the military showed great restraint. As far as I know, Ven doesn't have a posse comitatus act.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. an election result unfavorable to Chavez is a coup?
that's what Hugo was referring to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billy Burnett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't think that's what he was referring to.
The return of the oligarchy he was referring to was another US staged/backed coup.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. he was referring to the government in Carabobo and says so
"if they return to the government, perhaps I will take out the tanks from the brigage, to protect the people of Carabobo." there is no reference to deposing Chavez or the military acting against him.

since Chavez is never wrong, that means you are. and VenezuelanAnalysis didn't report his words accurately.

you heard the crowd cheering, you and others are unworthy. Chavez said what he said, how dare Venanalysis and you try to hide what he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billy Burnett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Context.
Edited on Thu Nov-13-08 10:53 AM by Billy Burnett
I'm not going to get into one of your pissing contests, although, coming from you, I find accusations of lack of accuracy somewhat amusing.

Your thread title asked readers to decide.

OK. I've decided.


on edit - Oh yeah. You are right. Those of us who are the "others" you refer to are indeed worthy of a representative government rather than an oligarchy. :thumbsup:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. ok, good for you. the "oligarchy" is already in power in Carabobo
and Chavez said he may take out the tanks if the same government is returned. nothing to dispute here. Reuters got it right. Venanalysis one would think would be 100% behind Chavez and not attempt to hide his words.

you may want to find a news source that does't attempt to mask Chavez words. or you can take Chavez at his word. that's what a good revolutionary would do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subsuelo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks -- I love selective quoting
the neatest part is - you can do it to anyone, and fit nearly any agenda! Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. you're welcome, at least we vindicated Reuters and showed Venanalysis
Edited on Thu Nov-13-08 03:45 PM by Bacchus39
to misrepresent the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subsuelo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Only in your mind
Edited on Thu Nov-13-08 04:40 PM by subsuelo
the rest of us, lacking an agenda to cherry pick quotes that portray the progressive leaders of the Latin American social revolution as anti-democratic commie dictators, will see through the disinformation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Chavez said what he said, Reuters reported what he said
Venanalysis did NOT report what he said. its all right there. if you really supported Chavez you wouldn't be denying what he said and would agree with him that if the election turns out different than what he wants, then military action may be called for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subsuelo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I guess when you have an agenda it's easy to see your view.
Edited on Thu Nov-13-08 08:41 PM by subsuelo
I get it from that perspective. Chavez surely is an evil dictator commie. He hates democracy and freedom.

Now that I see the agenda, I see how that selective quote nicely fits in. We should do something about that guy, huh.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. you see the agenda of confirming the Reuters reporting, good.
that is a start. I don't think there is a need to "do anything about that guy". Like I've posted before, Chavez is irrelevant. Wild accusations that the US is going to invade or that the US is going to assassinate him no longer have any meaning, not that they ever did.

we buy their oil. relations are already improving with Latin America with the election of President Obama. nothing else needs to be done. I'll continue to report accurate info and point out the stupidity of Chavez. I guess that is an agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC