Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Consortium to invest $1.3bn in Bolivian gasfields

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:56 PM
Original message
Consortium to invest $1.3bn in Bolivian gasfields
Consortium to invest $1.3bn in Bolivian gasfields
By Naomi Mapstone in Lima

Published: December 9 2010 01:27 | Last updated: December 9 2010 01:27

A European-Argentine consortium is to invest $1.3bn over five years in two natural gasfields in the south of Bolivia.

Repsol of Spain, BG Group of the UK and Pan American Energy of Argentina will develop the Margarita and Huacaya fields, boosting output from 2m cubic metres per day to 8m cmd, according to Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales (YPFB), Bolivia’s state energy company.

The investment comes amid intense speculation over the size of Bolivia’s proven gas reserves after a report by US consulting firm Ryder Scott reportedly put the country’s reserves at between 8.3 and 9.3 trillion cubic feet, instead of the 12.8 to 26.7 trillion-cubic-foot range used by government.

More:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fc3e88f2-032d-11e0-80eb-00144feabdc0.html#axzz17Zyvt9sX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
social_critic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would not worry about it until I look at the fine print
Both sources may be right. Ryder Scott would be using the definition of proven used by the US Securities and Exchange Commission, because their figures will be used by the companies in their filings as well as bond issues.

The Bolivians may be using a more liberal definition. The key difference may be the gas sales contract - Ryder Scott would only count the reserves within the contract period, and within the existing license the private companies have secured. The Bolivians could be using a broader term, and could be ignoring the gas sales contract period as well. Finally, it is well known those fields will recover more gas if they are squeezed harder by drilling more wells, but the foreigners may not be willing to drill the number of wells required because Bolivian terms have been made less attractive as Bolivia follows the Venezuelan's lead.

In Venezuela the industry is seeing a similar effect, the type of terms imposed by the government have reduced production in the old service contract areas as well as the Orinoco heavy oil areas, and it looks like the recovery factor will be lower under the current system. This of course will leave oil in the ground which otherwise can be sold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC