Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: File s Released by Colombia Point to Venezuelan Bid to Arm Rebels

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
magbana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:33 PM
Original message
NYT: File s Released by Colombia Point to Venezuelan Bid to Arm Rebels
March 30, 2008
Files Released by Colombia Point to Venezuelan Bid to Arm Rebels
By SIMON ROMERO

BOGOTÁ, Colombia — Files provided by Colombian officials from computers they say were captured in a cross-border raid in Ecuador this month appear to tie Venezuela's government to efforts to secure arms for Colombia's largest insurgency.

Officials taking part in Colombia's investigation of the computers provided The New York Times with copies of more than 20 files, some of which also showed contributions from the rebels to the 2006 campaign of Ecuador's leftist president, Rafael Correa.

If verified, the computer files would offer rare insight into the cloak-and-dagger nature of Latin America's longest-running guerrilla conflict, including what appeared to be the killing of a Colombian government spy who had microchips implanted in her body, a crime apparently carried out by the guerrillas in their jungle redoubt.

They would also potentially link the governments of Venezuela and Ecuador to the leftist guerrillas of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, which is classified by Washington as a terrorist organization and has fought to overthrow Colombia's government for four decades.

While it was impossible to authenticate the files independently, the Colombian officials said their government had invited Interpol to verify the files. They did not want to be named while Interpol completed its report.

Both the United States and Colombia, Washington's staunchest ally in the region, have a strong interest in undercutting President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela, who has sought to counter the influence of the United States by forming his own leftist bloc. But the Colombian officials who provided the computer files adamantly vouched for them.

The files contained touches that suggested authenticity: they were filled with revolutionary jargon, passages in numerical code, missives about American policy in Latin America and even brief personal reflections like one by a senior rebel commander on the joy of becoming a grandfather.

Other senior Colombian officials said the files made public so far only scratched the surface of the captured archives, risking new friction with Venezuela and Ecuador, which have dismissed the files as fakes.

Vice President Francisco Santos said Colombia's stability was at risk if explicit support from its neighbors for the FARC, the country's largest armed insurgency, was proved true. "The idea that using weapons to topple a democratic government has not been censured is not only stupid," Mr. Santos said in an interview. "It is frankly frightening."

Colombia's relations with its two Andean neighbors veered suddenly toward armed conflict after Colombian forces raided a FARC camp in Ecuador on March 1, killing 26 people, including a top FARC commander, and capturing the computers, according to the Colombians.

Though tensions ebbed after a summit meeting of Latin American nations in the Dominican Republic this month, the matter of the computer files has threatened to reignite the diplomatic crisis caused by the raid.

Shortly after the crisis erupted, Colombian officials began releasing a small portion of the computer files, some of which they said showed efforts by Mr. Chávez's government to provide financial support for the FARC.

Defense Minister Juan Manuel Santos said in an interview that officials had obtained more than 16,000 files from three computers belonging to Luis Édgar Devia Silva, a commander known by his nom de guerre, Raúl Reyes, who was killed in the raid. Two other hard drives were also captured, he said.

"Everything has been accessed and everything is being validated by Interpol," Mr. Santos said, adding that he expected the work on the validation to be completed by the end of April. "It is a great deal of information that is extremely valuable and important."

Mr. Santos, who said the computers survived the raid because they were in metal casing, strongly defended Colombia's military foray into Ecuador, which drew condemnation in other parts of Latin America as a violation of Ecuador's sovereignty.

"Personally, I do not regret a thing, absolutely nothing, but I am a minister of a government that has agreed this type of action would not be repeated," Mr. Santos said. "Of course, this depends on our neighbors collaborating on the fight against terrorism."

Mr. Chávez, in a meeting with foreign journalists last week in Caracas, lashed out at Colombia's government and mocked the files.

"The main weapon they have now is the computer, the supposed computer of Raúl Reyes," Mr. Chávez said. "This computer is like à la carte service, giving you whatever you want. You want steak? Or fried fish? How would you like it prepared? You'll get it however the empire decides."

The correspondence also pointed to warm relations between Venezuela's government and the FARC.

One letter, dated Jan. 25, 2007, by Iván Márquez, a member of the FARC's seven-member secretariat, discussed a meeting with a Venezuelan official called Carvajal. "Carvajal," Mr. Márquez wrote, "left with the pledge of bringing an arms dealer from Panama."

Officials here said they believed that the official in question was Gen. Hugo Carvajal, the director of military intelligence in Venezuela, a confidant of Mr. Chávez and perhaps Venezuela's most powerful intelligence official.

In other correspondence from September 2004 after the killing by the FARC of six Venezuelan soldiers and a Venezuelan engineer on Venezuelan soil that month, General Carvajal's longstanding ties to the guerrillas also come into focus. In these letters, the guerrillas describe talks with General Carvajal, Mr. Chávez's emissary to deal with the issue.

"Today I met with General Hugo Carvajal," a FARC commander wrote in one letter dated Sept. 23, 2004. "He said he guarded the secret hope that what happened in Apure," the rebel wrote in reference to the Venezuelan border state where the killings took place, "was the work of a force different from our own."

Officials in General Carvajal's office at the General Directorate of Military Intelligence in Caracas did not respond to requests for comment on the letters. Mr. Chávez responded to a report earlier this year in Colombia claiming that General Carvajal provided logistical assistance to the FARC by calling it an "attack on the revolution" he has led in Venezuela.

Another file recovered from Mr. Devia's computers, dated Jan. 18, 2007, described efforts by the FARC's secretariat to secure Mr. Chávez's assistance for buying arms and obtaining a $250 million loan, "to be paid when we take power."

The FARC, a Marxist-inspired insurgency that has persisted for four decades, finances itself largely through cocaine trafficking and kidnappings for ransom. But other files from the computers suggested that Colombia's counterinsurgency effort, financed in large part by $600 million a year in aid from Washington, was making these activities less lucrative for the FARC, forcing it to consider options like selling Venezuelan gasoline at a profit in Colombia.

The release of the files comes at a delicate time when some lawmakers in Washington are pressing for Venezuela to be included on a list of countries that are state sponsors of terrorism. But with Venezuela remaining a leading supplier of oil to the United States, such a move is considered unlikely because of the limits on trade it would entail.

Moreover, interpretations of the files from Mr. Devia's computers have already led to some mistakes.

For instance, El Tiempo, Colombia's leading daily newspaper, issued an apology this month to Gustavo Larrea, Ecuador's security minister, after publishing a photograph obtained from the computers in which the newspaper claimed Mr. Larrea was shown meeting with Mr. Devia at a FARC camp. In fact, the photograph was of Patricio Etchegaray, an official with Argentina's Communist Party.

Still, the files from Mr. Devia's computers are expected to haunt relations among Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela for some time.

For instance, one piece of correspondence dated Nov. 21, 2006, and circulated among the FARC's secretariat, describes a $100,000 donation to the campaign of Mr. Correa, Ecuador's president.

Of that amount, $50,000 came from the FARC's "Eastern bloc," a militarily strong faction that operates in eastern Colombia, and $20,000 from the group's "Southern bloc," according to the document.

President Álvaro Uribe of Colombia referred this month to files from Mr. Devia's computers showing financing of Mr. Correa's campaign by the FARC, but he stopped short of releasing them after tensions eased at the summit meeting in the Dominican Republic.

"Any archive is not valid until it is verified," said Pedro Artieda, a spokesman at Ecuador's Foreign Ministry, when asked for comment. "Therefore, the government cannot comment on something that is not confirmed." Mr. Correa had previously disputed the campaign-finance claims based on the computers' files, saying they lacked "technical and legal" validity.

Other files offer insight into the methods employed by the FARC and Colombia's government in their four-decade war. In one letter by Mr. Devia dated Jan. 5, 2007, to Manuel Marulanda, the most senior member of the FARC's secretariat, he described a woman in their ranks who was discovered to be a government spy.

"The new thing here," Mr. Devia wrote, "was that she had two microchips, one under her breast and the other beneath her jaw."

Mr. Devia went on to describe the reaction to this discovery, explaining in the rebels' slang that she was given "a course."

"Yesterday they threw her into the hole after proving what she was," he wrote, "and giving her the counsel of war."


Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/30/world/americas/30colombia.html?ref=world
http://snipurl.com/22xyt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
magbana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Strap on Your Seat Belt - It's Going to be a Bumpy Ride
So they couldn't wait until Interpol finished its review of the docs in another month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. if the interpol comes with a different analysis everybody else will have their mine set
so people don't have to read the long report from interpol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magbana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. The head of Interpol is an American -- Ron Noble
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks for the links. Will return to finish the CBS link later this evening. Sure hope this guy
is not political.

His HONEST report is really important to this situation.

They seemed to have been able to hit the jackpot with the raid. If they hadn't done this, they wouldn't have been able to create a scenario which would seem as authentic a reason to spontaneously "discover" the guy's laptop.

Even when it was "discovered" this way, people were laughing about it instantly, claiming whatever the thing was made of, they wanted one just like it, as it could withstand being immediately in the way of bombs and weapon fire.

Chavez has it right. They've got a magic box, just as if they had a genie in it: they are pulling things out of their asses you'd never even think about. Apparently they want us to believe the guy entered absolutely everything which could ever impugn a group right there where it could be grabbed the minute any of them got slaughtered, and handed over to their enemies.

And they took it to a site where they were expecting to hand over hostages! Imagine that!

Hope that Noble is clean. His opinion will carry a lot of weight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magbana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. For the record, Chavez Called Uribe a Few Days Ago to Say Cut the Crap
Chavez `Concerned' by Colombia Claims of FARC Ties (Update1)

By Matthew Walter

March 27 (Bloomberg) -- Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said he's ``concerned'' that the Colombian government continues to publish accusations linking his government and the government of Ecuador with Colombia's biggest guerrilla group.

Chavez said he called Colombian President Alvaro Uribe yesterday to discuss why Colombia continues to publish accusations based on information in four laptop computers recovered from a guerrilla camp.

``This computer could say anything,'' Chavez said today during a visit to Brazil, in comments broadcast by state television. ``I expressed my concern that they keep doing these things, that they keep saying these things -- that Ecuador supports guerrillas, that Venezuela supports guerrillas.''

Chavez said making the data on the computers public amounts to a ``provocation.'' Earlier this month, he said that Colombia's attack on a camp of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia in Ecuadorean territory might provoke a war.

The Venezuelan president said he's spoken with Uribe three times since the leaders agreed to resolve the conflict March 7, and that he's pleased with the message he's received from the Colombian leader.

``Beyond that, there are very powerful forces at work,'' Chavez said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Matthew Walter in Caracas at mwalter4@bloomberg.net.
Last Updated: March 27, 2008 12:49 EDT

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=ahkZpaTqF62Y&refer=latin_america

http://snipurl.com/22y79
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Is Judith Miller using a pen-name now?
Jeez, this trashy, war propaganda writing is unbelievable. Does this shithead reporter have no conscience?

The NYT really has become toilet paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Isn't he pathetic? The NY Times have used THREE witchy reporters to rip and tear at Chavez,
Franciso Toro, Simon Romero, and Juan Forero. Francisco was learned to have become completely absorbed in the Venezuelan elite circles in Caracas, even part of an anti-Chavez U.S. taxpayer-money-grabbing NGO, and finally resigned once his work became so easily discredited.

Juan Forero is dreadful, has been considered unethical and treacherous for ages, and this Simon Romero simply sucks bigtime! Here's an article that leaped up immediately when I went on a simple search for simon romero new york times anti chavez bias:
The Times’s Anti-Chávez Bias
By Amitabh Pal
December 6, 2006

The New York Times seems to have it in for Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez. The paper’s Latin America bureau chief, Simon Romero, has a big anti-Chávez bias, and it shows.

Take Romero’s story on Chávez’s massive electoral triumph the past weekend. The lead reads: “President Hugo Chávez won a landslide victory in the presidential election on Sunday. But campaign officials for the opposition candidate contended that the results were tainted by intimidation and other irregularities.” The headline writer adopted the same tone. “Chávez Wins Easily in Venezuela, but Opposition Protests,” the headline read, while the subhead stated: “Challenger’s Vote Exceeds Predictions.”

Now, charges of fraud should be reported on, but Chávez’s margin of victory should have made Romero question the opposition’s accusations, instead of giving them such prominence. The fact that these assertions were half-hearted can be seen by the fact that Chávez’s opponent, Manuel Rosales, conceded defeat the same day.

Curiously, it seems that the Times’s web editorial staff recognized the problematic aspects of Romero’s piece. The online version reads quite differently, with the headline and opening sanitized and the subhead taken out altogether.

Romero continued his anti-Chávez crusade the day after Chávez’s triumph. “If President Hugo Chávez rules like an autocrat, as his critics in Washington and here charge, then he does so with the full permission of a substantial majority of the Venezuelan people,” his piece opened. The pull quote for the piece referred to “some heads being chopped,” come January. (Interestingly, the person quoted is Steve Ellner, a progressive scholar who has written on Venezuela for publications such as In These Times, and his full quote is much less hostile to Chávez.) Another person cited in the piece says that “Chavez is not a dictator, but he’s not a Thomas Jefferson either.” Well, who is? Not too many current world leaders have Jefferson’s caliber, including the person currently occupying his post.

Romero’s hostility toward Chávez was also obvious in the run up to the presidential election. In a story two days before election day, he chose to highlight a crime wave in Venezuela, and quoted the opposition presidential candidate Rosales (without providing any balance) blaming Chávez for the phenomenon.

“Chávez nourishes the anarchic forces that are tearing Venezuela apart with a discourse advocating aggression on all fronts,” Rosales told the Times. And the Times accepted this tendentious sociological analysis without question.

Romero is not the only person at the Times with an anti-Chávez agenda. After all, the editorial staff at the Times gleefully supported the 2002 U.S.-backed military coup against Chávez, a duly elected leader. In a classic case of doublespeak, the Times stated that “Venezuelan democracy is no longer threatened by a would-be dictator.” The Times gently explained to its readers that Chávez “stepped down after the military intervened and handed power to a respected business leader.” Chávez’s triumphant return three days later forced the Times to eat crow.
More:
http://www.progressive.org/node/4286

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC