Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Agreement is Just the Beginning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 05:25 PM
Original message
The Agreement is Just the Beginning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is a very lucid statement about what is really going on in Honduras...
Since 2005, elements of the people’s movement in Honduras have advocated for constitutional reform, desperate for real social transformation in this country, one of the poorest in the hemisphere, where about twelve percent of the population controls about eighty-five percent of its resources, and where neoliberal reform is well entrenched in the business of further consolidating control of those resources. When earlier this year Zelaya agreed to hold a non-binding national survey to ask the population if it were interested in creating a mechanism for constitutional reform, it was at the behest of Honduran social movements. Terrified of real reform, the business elite spread the word that Zelaya was trying to extend his own power to justify the coup, which took place the same day for which the national survey was planned.

It’s with real joy that Hondurans in the streets meet possibility of Zelaya’s imminent return to government, as an agreement resulting from negotiations between Zelaya and Micheletti calls for his restitution by Thursday, November 5th after more than four months of defiance of Honduran and international law on the part of the Michelettie regime, and brutal repression of those who would challenge it by the police and military forces. But throughout the struggle for Zelaya’s return, the Resistance movement hasn’t forgotten its original plan of constitutional reform. It’s with an eye towards this level of social transformation – the creation of real participatory democracy in Honduras – that we should evaluate the agreement.

The Context of Negotiation

Zelaya returned to Honduras in late September, and has been effectively incarcerated in the Brazilian embassy since. He and some supporters have been living surrounded by a military cordon which dictates who or what enters or leaves the embassy. The military has attacked the embassy with sound cannons, neurotoxins, and light pollution in the middle of the night. Zelaya was allowed to meet with his advisors just two hours before negotiations began on their first day, and during those two hours, the embassy was tear-gassed. These are the conditions under which the elected president of Honduras has been ‘negotiating’ with the coup regime that illegally and forcibly usurped power. Rather than denounce such negotiations as a charade, powerful actors in the international community have exhorted the Honduran people to put their faith in these lopsided conversations.

You Can Forget About Real Change

The agreement unequivocally states that the government will not allow for any process of constitutional reform. It states that even the legal process of carrying out a nonbinding survey on the subject of constitutional reform will not be allowed.

Nothing To See Here, Folks

The agreement calls for the creation of a government of “Unity and Reconciliation.” This means that Manuel Zelaya will return as president, but that Micheletti will also remain in the government, and that representatives of each administration will share power as well. This is nothing more than a tactic to demonstrate to the rest of the world that the crisis in Honduras is over, that there’s no reason it can’t proceed with national elections on 29 November.

Indeed, the agreement includes a call to the Honduran people to participate in the upcoming elections as though the conditions of repression and unconstitutionality in which citizens have been living for the past four months do not impede a trustworthy election process -- as though the Independent presidential candidate had not been severely beaten by police, as though the sister of his running mate were not illegitimately charged with sedition, as though people who have been savagely repressed in their own streets and neighborhoods by the military could trust that same military with the proper execution of a democratic process. As though the people could trust an election process in which some candidates are funded by the same actors responsible for an illegal coup d’etat.

The agreement calls for Hondurans to forget what they’ve lived for the last four months, to participate in national elections as though everything were normal, and to accept that the military is the principal body charged with the care and security of the ballots.

The Truth

The agreement calls for the creation of a Truth Commission in 2010 “that will identify the acts that led to the present situation, and provide to the Honduran people elements to avoid that those deeds will be repeated in the future.” The agreement says nothing about holding responsible the fundamental actors of the coup, nor those in the police and military forces who have committed human rights violations against the people. Human rights organizations have documented nearly thirty politically-motivated deaths since June 28th, and thousands of cases of human rights violations. People participating in forms of nonviolent resistance against the coup have been beaten, tear-gassed, shot, disappeared, threatened, and tortured by the state security apparatus which includes police, military, and private security. It will be the responsibility of the next government – those that emerge with the power after the very controversial elections of 29 November which many Hondurans believe will be fraudulent – to create the Truth Commission.

The People Haven’t Agreed To Anything

The Resistance in Honduras continues to evaluate and analyze how it will keep struggling for constitutional reform, and for justice. Social movements are better organized than they were before the coup, newly aware of the lengths to which the elite will go to preserve their own privilege, and more determined than ever to achieve that kind of social transformation that would allow for a truly transparent and democratic power structure in Honduras.

If a nonbinding survey about the possibility of constitutional reform was enough to spark a coup, if the agreement directly stipulates against it, then to what lengths will the elite go to prevent the actual realization of constitutional reform? The Honduran social movement deserves international attention and support in its struggle for structural change, and those of us interested in real democracy in the Western Hemisphere should not make the mistake of assuming that Zelaya’s return and an electoral process mean that all is well and right in Honduras. Human rights organizations will continue to denounce human rights violations and to denounce the impunity of the military and the elite. The people’s movements will continue to struggle for social transformation, for their right to self-determination and to real peace. This struggle is not simply a matter of electing the right candidate or urging the military back to its barracks; it’s a long haul that will continue, no matter who sits in the presidential house.


http://www.quixote.org/blog/agreement-just-beginning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But the elections will be held
And there will be a new president and congress. Regarding the coup, I believe what triggered was Zelaya's firing of the head of the Army when the general refused to help with the survey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The firing of the general comes late in the story. There was Zelaya's raising of the minimum wage.
And John Negroponte's visit to Honduras, during which he discovered that Zelaya was proposing to convert the US military base in Honduras to a commercial airport. And John McCain's funneling of $43 million (of US taxpayer dollars) to rightwing, coup supporting political groups in Honduras, through the USAID. And Zelaya's listening to labor groups, human rights groups, religious advocates of the poor majority and many others on the need for fundamental reform in Honduras. This latter terrified the oligarchy more than anything. Honduras has theoretical civilian control of the military. Zelaya firing a general would not likely have triggered the coup if the issue had not been fundamental reform (the Constituent Assembly proposed survey vote).

"But the elections will be held." So? What are you saying? It's okay, with a leftist candidate for president with broken bones from a police beating, and two dozen leftist activists dead, and thousands harmed or still in prison, and four months of nothing but coup-supporting media allowed to broadcast, and no right of free speech, no right of assembly, no right of transit and no right of habeas corpus for four months? It's okay with you for an election to proceed in which civil rights do not exist?

You're saying "get used to"? Yield? Forget? Be sheep? The "elections will be held" BUT they shouldn't be held in these circumstances.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC