Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Indian political awakening stirs Latin America

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 02:48 PM
Original message
Indian political awakening stirs Latin America
Indian political awakening stirs Latin America
By FRANK BAJAK
The Associated Press
Sunday, November 1, 2009; 11:24 AM

http://media3.washingtonpost.com.nyud.net:8090/wp-dyn/content/photo/2009/11/01/PH2009110100852.jpg

In this photo taken Aug. 20, 2009, Aymara authorities attend a meeting in Jesus de Machaca, Bolivia. In February, Bolivia's voters approved a new constitution creating a "plurinational state." It grants the Andean country's 36 native peoples the right to self-determination, including collective title to their lands. All over Latin America, and especially in the Andes, a political awakening is emboldening Indians who have lived mostly as second-class citizens since the Spanish conquest. (AP Photo/Juan Karita) (Juan Karita - AP)

JESUS DE MACHACA, Bolivia -- In Ecuador, the Shuar are blocking highways to defend their hunting grounds. In Chile, the Mapuche are occupying ranches to pressure for land, schools and clinics. In Bolivia, a new constitution gives the country's 36 indigenous peoples the right to self-rule.

All over Latin America, and especially in the Andes, a political awakening is emboldening Indians who have lived mostly as second-class citizens since the Spanish conquest.

Much of it is the result of better education and communication, especially as the Internet allows native leaders in far-flung villages to share ideas and strategies across international boundaries.

But much is born of necessity: Latin American nations are embarking on an unprecedented resource hunt, moving in on land that Indians consider their own - and whose pristine character is key to their survival.

"The Indian movement has arisen because the government doesn't respect our territories, our resources, our Amazon," says Romulo Acachu, president of the Shuar people, flanked by warriors carrying wooden spears and with black warpaint smeared on their faces.

More:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/01/AR2009110100850.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very interesting glimpse of the future for indigenous rights nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's more "native Americans"
I don't think they like to be called Indians. And don't forget "eskimos" are Inuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. In Spanish...
it's indígenas (indigenous). Indians translates to indios, which is considered an ethnic slur. There is no word for native Americans, at least in Mexico.

And my Cherokee and Apache friends in Oklahoma call themselves Indians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hm-m. You gotta wonder why the Associated Pukes and the Washington Pisst
are touting indigenous rights, which they care about as much as they care about the rights of a million slaughtered Iraqis.

Beware.

----------------

I just visited their Puke ‘news’ page, read the whole article and looked for the obvious. Yes, they mention Colombia and Peru, and don't just mention countries with leftist governments getting protested by the indigenous. They spend some inches on Bolivia and its first indigenous president, Evo Morales, but fail to mention the Bushwhack- funded/organized white separatist insurrection in Bolivia's eastern provinces last September.

The white separatists rioted, trashed government buildings, took over an airport, sabotaged a gas pipeline and machine-gunned some 30 unarmed peasant farmers. Morales threw the US ambassador (and the DEA) out of Bolivia for collusion with these criminals. The white separatists/Bushwhack goal was to split off Bolivia's gas/oil rich eastern provinces into a fascist mini-state in control of Bolivia's main resources. Rafael Correa, president of Ecuador, has said that there is a coordinated fascist plot for such civil war scenarios in three countries--Ecuador, Venezuela, Bolivia. Coordinated (and funded) by whom, we don't need to ask. So, part of what the Washington Past is doing here is re-writing history--leaving a big black hole where information should be, that our government did the above, and is persona non grata in Bolivia because of it.

I would imagine that, where the Bushwhacks and their local fascist friends can find a way to use some indigenous group to harass a leftist government--the way they have used corrupt labor unionists, for instance (in Mexico and in Venezuela, recently, and in Chile and other places in the past)--they will do it, or try to do it. This article could be part of setting something like that up. The article treats the subject of the indigenous with some sympathy, and if you're in Washington DC right now, you could go walking near the WaPo offices and see vomit all over the sidewalks, of people made mysteriously ill just strolling close to the source of such hypocrisy.

The Washington Pest is a CIA rag. They don't publish anything that is not approved, and for which there are not ulterior motives, except maybe in the sports section. Note: The Bushwhacks are still mostly in charge of US embassies in Latin America, apparently because the Pukes in Congress are blockading Obama's Latin America appointments. Also, Obama has been in office less than a year--not sufficient time to ferret out all the Bushwhack moles in the CIA, the Pentagon, the diplomatic corp, etc., who may be set to trigger trouble for Obama (like the recent rightwing coup in Honduras) for short- and long-term purposes (ultimately an oil war, I think).

This is not to say there are not real issues between indigenous peoples and the both right- and left-wing governments in Latin America. There are. The CIA-these days exacerbated by Bushwhack torturers and assassins--sometimes creates protest out of nothing, but more often utilizes protest movements with some genuineness to them, to cause trouble and destabilization for governments they want to topple. The USAID-NED even trains protest groups in destabilization techniques (more usually rightwing groups and their thugs).

And the leftwing governments in Latin America are all struggling, of course, to use the profits from their rich resources to fund education, health care, land reform, local manufacturing and diversification and other progress and development. Previous rightwing governments ignored social needs and positively sought to dismantle progressive, forward-looking social programs. All these countries suffer the long term effects of their greed and mismanagement. The leftist governments feel they need to exploit their countries' oil, gas, minerals, timber and other resources for good purposes, and--although these governments are certainly more sympathetic to the indigenous, by many orders of magnitude, over any previous governments, who just shoved them aside, often brutally—the new leftist leaders often come up against the indigenous, who have far more advanced understanding of the plight of Mother Earth than anybody else.

Brutality against the indigenous continues wherever corpo-fascists hold sway, and also wherever US military aid goes--for instance, in Colombia and Peru. (Colombia has one of the worst human rights records on earth--downplayed in this article--and Peru is heading in that direction.) But it is not characteristic of leftist governments; rather the opposite. The indigenous are generally an important part of the coalitions that elect leftist presidents and other officials.

Government leaders like Correa in Ecuador, and Chavez in Venezuela, have to balance these pressures--or feel they have to balance them. Correa, for instance, recently said that the indigenous have to understand that the resources belong to all Ecuadorans. He is the leftist who currently is having the most difficulty, as to clashes with the indigenous. He speaks the indigenous language and spent time in the mountains with indigenous tribes when he was younger. He has done much good on the matter of indigenous civil and land rights, but wouldn't yield mineral rights to them.

It is a very difficult problem, in which my sympathies go back and forth. Chevron is out to get Correa, because of a pending court ruling in Ecuador awarding billions of dollars to 30,000 indigenous whose lands and health were basically ruined by Chevron-Texaco toxic spills (in an area the size of Rhode Island). Correa openly backs the indigenous claims. Truly, it leaves you torn. If Chevron and the Bushwhacks succeed in getting rid of Correa--and they are working hard on that--where will the indigenous be? Are Ecuador's fascists going to give a damn about them? Indeed not.

So, you see why a WaPo article on the indigenous raises my hackles and my suspicions. Correa also recently threw the US military out of Ecuador. US corpo-fascists--of which the WaPo is a chief propagandist--are not likely to forgive that, nor the Chevron lawsuit award. They don't want anyone but their multi-billionaire pals to control Ecuador's rich resources and government policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That slapped me in the face, too! Unbelieable pattern, isn't it?
Anyone who cares about these things has read enough to see the pattern right there. Real, actual, deliberate anti-leftist scheming.

Very, VERY little truthfulness invested in discussing actual massacres by Alan Garcia's, Alvaro Uribe's forces, they went right after recreating history right out of the gates, bless their contorted, hardened, deceitful little hearts.

They get as far away from the actual facts on their stories as they possibly can. The truth would just ruin everything for them and their masters.

As we have seen, it's not just Chavez. It's ALL leaders who seek to improve the lives of ALL the citizens, and move their countries forward. They uphold the traditions of that feudal, brutal fascist past, because the old bastards gleefully sold out their citizens, threw open the doors for the raping, pillaging hordes of monstrous greedy, avaricious hypocrites from the North.

Everything from these once respected papers MUST be studied, as there's a TON of negative undercurrent, covered by the thinest shell of mock concern, just enough to draw you in, to get your attention while they attempt to load you up with lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. We will find the nutwing trying to pick off the indigenous
all over the region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC