Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Uruguay former rebel chief seen to finish first in presidential polls

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 01:50 AM
Original message
Uruguay former rebel chief seen to finish first in presidential polls
Edited on Thu Oct-22-09 01:58 AM by Judi Lynn
Uruguay former rebel chief seen to finish first in presidential polls
Web posted at: 10/22/2009 8:36:37
Source ::: REUTERS

MONTEVIDEO: A left-wing former guerrilla leader is expected to finish first in Uruguay’s presidential election on Sunday but will likely face a run-off as he tries to keep the socialist ruling coalition in power.

But polls show Mujica falling short of a majority needed to win outright in the first round. Center-right former President Luis Lacalle is running second, trailed by Pedro Bordaberry, another rightist candidate who lags a distant third. A second-round vote, analysts say, could pose a challenge to Mujica, who led the Tupamaros guerrilla movement which battled security forces and kidnapped government officials during the 1960s and early 1970s but has since moderated his politics.

“This is an important test for the left. Mujica is someone who provokes strong feelings from both his supporters and his critics,” said Teresa Herrera, a Uruguayan political analyst.

More:
http://www.thepeninsulaqatar.com/Display_news.asp?section=World_News&subsection=Americas&month=October2009&file=World_News2009102283637.xml

http://200.82.82.210.nyud.net:8090/fotos/MUU_1.jpg

The President of Argentina and spouse
on either side of José Mujica
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. He hardly looks like a "guerrilla." He looks like a Hobbit!
Thanks for the photo! I've never seen an image of a Latin American leader in such complete contrast to the corpo/fascist description of him. I mean, you look at some photos of Hugo Chavez and, yeah, you could imagine a "dictator" (--although when Chavez smiles, the sun shines--he has an open-hearted smile--and when he is in a relaxed mode, as in that vid of him singing "Todo Cambió" on stage with Fernando Lugo, the imaginable, would-be, just around the corner, any-day-now "dictator" vanishes). Evo Morales creates something of this contrast (between image and corpo/fascist description). He always looks vulnerable in photos, despite having a spine of steel, and also being called a "dictator." (Nationalizing Bolivia's gas reserves, and requiring social programs in exchange for lithium contracts, make him a "dictator" in the eyes of corpo/fascists.) "Dictator" Rafael Correa--yeah, you can see a bit of ego there, the hard edges of a beautiful powermonger (--although when you get down to what he actually has done--pensions for the elderly poor, getting an equal rights for women and gays provision into the new Constitution--and protection of the rights of Mother Earth--"Pachamama"--your standard "dictator" stereotype doesn't hold up; same with the others--they may be hardass politicians, but they get things done for the powerless).

Anyway, a cuddly guerrilla! How interesting! I guess we should remember that the Hobbits are capable warriors, when the need arises, though they prefer their pipes and their slippers and the quiet life in Hobbit-land. Can this fuzzy-footed little guy have been a guerrilla fighting against the Dark Lords? Ask Tolkien!

----------------

And ain't it the most interesting thing of all, that resistance fighters--leftist guerrilla warriors--or their political parties have become so popular in Latin America--with the leftist rebels in Nicaragua and the leftist rebel party in El Salvador winning the presidencies; Chavez himself, once having been in armed rebellion, winning election after election in Venezuela; and now another former armed rebel ahead in the Uruguyan election. There is also Ollanta Humala, who led the military uprising against the horrible Fujimora regime in Peru, and almost won the last presidential election, and will likely be back in the next one, to oust the corrupt and now blood-soaked Alan Garcia.

We should never forget how heinous the Reagan dictatorships and their bloody reigns in these countries were--that prompted good people to see no choice but to take up arms. And it's no wonder that the Bushwhacks and the Reaganites are in a state of panic, and doing things like the fascist Junta in Honduras. These leftist guerrillas are the very people they were trying to exterminate in the 1980s, are still trying to exterminate in Colombia, and have been trying to assassinate and topple as recently as last September (with the Bushwhack coup plot in Bolivia). It must be a nightmare for them to have the resistance to their bloody reign come back like this, and win elections, and start revolutionizing Latin America peacefully and democratically. Weren't these leftists supposed to be totally demoralized or dead?

I think the Bushwack/Reaganite plotting goes beyond panic. They want an oil war in South America. Mass death is their only idea. They cannot 'win' any other way. Leftists, on the other hand-- though some of them may have taken up arms against the horrors that were being inflicted on their people--do know how to "hammer swords into plowshares," and have positive programs for social justice, democratic participation, cooperation among Latin American countries and regional independence. The rightwingers--like Garcia in Peru--are just shills for US corporations, and are being rejected all over Latin America, except where they impose their criminal regimes by force (as in Colombia and, now, Honduras). Let us hope that the united force of all these newly empowered leftist leaders is able to turn back the Honduran coup and any others that are planned. Let's hope that democracy wins, and no one in Latin America ever again feels compelled make the dreadful choice of armed resistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The Tupamaros were quite different from other groups. Unusual people.
Uruguay is the country where Nixon sent U.S. torturer, Dan Mitrione, to "educate" the local police in ways to torture any rebels they could locate.

See this video with comments by former US CIA guy, Phillip Agee, and an excellent author, A.J. Langguth. A little over 4 minutes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIodEJ_EcY8

The Tupamaros Interrogate Dan Mitrione: Rare Audio Recording (1970)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyUk_YRdiXU&feature=related

Costa-Gavras made a movie based on his story, "State of Siege," and it was scheduled to open in a premier at the Kennedy Center, and it was abruptly cancelled. It did NOT show widely in the U.S. It was not covered by critics. It was suppressed. It's virtually impossible to run down a copy to see at home.

Daniel A. Mitrione (August 4, 1920–August 10, 1970) was an Italian-born<1> American police officer, FBI agent and a United States government security advisor for the CIA in Latin America.

Career
Mitrione was a police officer in Richmond, Indiana from 1945 to 1947 and joined the FBI in 1959. In 1960 he was assigned to State Department's International Cooperation Administration, going to South American countries to teach "advanced counterinsurgency techniques." A.J. Langguth, a former New York Times bureau chief in Saigon, claimed that Mitrione was among the US advisers teaching Brazilian police how much electric shock to apply to prisoners without killing them<2> Langguth also claimed that older police officers were replaced "when the CIA and the U.S. police advisers had turned to harsher measures and sterner men."<3> and that under the new head of the U.S. Public Safety program in Uruguay, Dan Mitrione, the United States "introduced a system of nationwide identification cards, like those in Brazil… torture had become routine at the Montevideo jefatura." <4>

From 1960 to 1967, Mitrione worked with the Brazilian police, first in Belo Horizonte then in Rio de Janeiro. A trainer in torture classes given to Brazilian police in Belo Horizonte, he led "practical demonstrations" of torture techniques using prisoners and beggars taken off the streets. According to a former student, Mitrione has insisted, in agreement with the CIA manual, that effective torture was science. He returned to the US in 1967 to share his experiences and expertise on "counterguerilla warfare" at the Agency for International Development (AID), in Washington D.C.. In 1969, Mitrione moved to Uruguay, again under the AID, to oversee the Office of Public Safety. Screenwriter Franco Solinas, a member of the Italian Communist Party, claims Mitrione was also in the Dominican Republic after the 1965 US intervention.<5>

Uruguayan posting and death
In this period the Uruguayan government, led by the Colorado Party, had its hands full with a collapsing economy, labor and student strikes, and the Tupamaros, a left-wing urban guerilla group. On the other hand, Washington feared a possible victory during the elections of the Frente Amplio, a left-wing coalition, on the model of the victory of the Unidad Popular government in Chile, led by Salvador Allende, in 1970. <6> The OPS had been helping the local police since 1965, providing them with weapons and training. It is claimed that torture had already been practiced since the 1960s, but Dan Mitrione was reportedly the man who made it routine.<7> He is quoted as having said once: "The precise pain, in the precise place, in the precise amount, for the desired effect." <8> Former Uruguayan police officials and CIA operatives claimed Mitrione had taught torture techniques to Uruguayan police in the cellar of his Montevideo home, including the use of electrical shocks delivered to his victims' mouths and genitals.<9> He also helped train foreign police agents in the United States in the context of the Cold War. It has been alleged that he used homeless people for training purposes, who were allegedly executed once they had served their purpose.<10>

As the use of torture grew and the tensions in Uruguay escalated, Mitrione was eventually kidnapped by the Tupamaros on July 31, 1970. They proceeded to interrogate him about his past and the intervention of the U.S. government in Latin American affairs. They also demanded the release of 150 political prisoners.<11> The Uruguayan government, with U.S. backing, refused, and Mitrione was later found dead in a car, shot twice in the head and with no other visible signs of maltreatment (beyond the fact that, during the kidnapping, Mitrione had been shot in one shoulder—for which he had evidently been treated while in captivity).<12>

After being released from prison the leader of the Tupamaros, Raul Sendic, revealed that Mitrione had not been suspected of teaching torture techniques to the police. He had trained police in riot control and was targeted for kidnapping as retaliation for the deaths of student protestors. <13>

Nixon Administration accolade
For its part, the Nixon Administration through spokesman Ron Ziegler affirmed that Mitrione's "devoted service to the cause of peaceful progress in an orderly world will remain as an example for free men everywhere" <14>.

Personal life
Mitrione was married and he had nine children. His funeral was largely publicised by the U.S. media, and it was attended by, amongst others, David Eisenhower and Richard Nixon's secretary of state William Rogers. Frank Sinatra and Jerry Lewis held a benefit concert for his family in Richmond, Indiana.<15>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Mitrione

~~~~~~~~~~~~
Daniel Mitrione was born in Italy on 4th August, 1920. The family emigrated to the United States and in 1945 Mitrione became a police officer in Richmond, Indiana.

Mitrione joined the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 1959. The following year he was assigned to the State Department's International Cooperation Administration. He was then sent to South America to teach "advanced counterinsurgency techniques." His speciality was in teaching the police how to torture political prisoners without killing them.

According to A.J. Langguth of the New York Times, Mitrione was working for the CIA via the International Development's Office of Public Safety (OPS). We know he was in several foreign countries but between 1960 and 1967 he spent a lot of time in Brazil and was involved in trying to undermine the left-wing president João Goulart, who had taken power after President Juscelino Kubitschek resigned from office in 1961.

João Goulart was a wealthy landowner who was opposed to communism. However, he was in favour of the redistribution of wealth in Brazil. As minister of labour he had increased the minimum wage by 100%. Colonel Vernon Walters, the US military attaché in Brazil, described Goulart as “basically a good man with a guilty conscience for being rich.”

The CIA began to make plans for overthrowing Goulart. A psychological warfare program approved by Henry Kissinger, at the request of telecom giant ITT during his chair of the 40 Committee, sent U.S. PSYOPS disinformation teams to spread fabricated rumors concerning Goulart. John McCloy was asked to set up a channel of communication between the CIA and Jack W. Burford, one of the senior executives of the Hanna Mining Company. In February, 1964, McCloy went to Brazil to hold secret negotiations with Goulart. However, Goulart rejected the deal offered by Hanna Mining.

The following month Lyndon B. Johnson gave the go-ahead for the overthrow of João Goulart (Operation Brother Sam). Colonel Vernon Walters arranged for General Castello Branco to lead the coup. A US naval-carrier task force was ordered to station itself off the Brazilian coast. As it happens, the Brazilian generals did not need the help of the task force. Goulart’s forces were unwilling to defend the democratically elected government and he was forced to go into exile. This action ended democracy in Brazil for more than twenty years. According to David Kaiser (American Tragedy) this event marks the change in the foreign policy developed by John F. Kennedy. Once again, Johnson showed that his policy was to support non-democratic but anti-communist, military dictatorships, and that he had fully abandoned Kennedy’s neutralization policy.

Mitrione remained in Brazil to help the new government deal with the supporters of João Goulart. According to Franco Solinas, Mitrione was also in the Dominican Republic after the 1965 US intervention.

In 1967 Mitrione returned to the United States to share his experiences and expertise on "counterguerilla warfare" at the Agency for International Development (AID), in Washington. In 1969, Mitrione moved to Uruguay, again under the AID, to oversee the Office of Public Safety. At this time the Uruguayan government was led by the very unpopular Colorado Party. Richard Nixon and the CIA feared a possible victory during the elections of the Frente Amplio, a left-wing coalition, on the model of the victory of the Unidad Popular government in Chile, led by Salvador Allende.

The OPS had been helping the local police since 1965, providing them with weapons and training. It is claimed that torture had already been practiced since the 1960s, but Dan Mitrione was reportedly the man who made it routine. He is quoted as having said: "The precise pain, in the precise place, in the precise amount, for the desired effect." It has been alleged that he used homeless people for training purposes, who were allegedly executed once they had served their purpose.

On July 31, 1970, the Tupamaros kidnapped Daniel Mitrione and an Agency for International Development associate, Claude L. Fly. Although they released Fry they proceeded to interrogate Mitrione about his past and the intervention of the U.S. government in Latin American affairs. They also demanded the release of 150 political prisoners. The Uruguayan government, with U.S. backing, refused, and Mitrione was later found dead in a car. He had been shot twice in the head but there was no evidence that he had been tortured.

The Secretary of State William P. Rogers and President Nixon's son-in-law David Eisenhower attended Mitrione's funeral. The Uruguayan ambassador, Hector Luisi, promised that the people responsible for Mitrione's death would "reap the wrath of civilized people everywhere".

A few days after the funeral, a senior Uruguayan police officer, Alejandro Otero, told the Jornal do Brasil that Mitrione had been employed to teach the police to use "violent techniques of torture and repression". The US government issued a statement calling this charge "absolutely false" and insisted he was a genuicentne member of the Agency for International Development.
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKmitrione.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There is a whole lot more to be learned on this guy, who made trips to meet with Jim Jones (Jonestown massacre, cyanide-laced Koolaid) and I've seen multiple references to it, but I absolutely haven't had the time I would need to get in there and start tracking it all down, yet.

It's in my plans.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Brief summary of the Tupamaros:
The Tupamaro movement was named after the Inca revolutionary Túpac Amaru II. Its origins lie in the union between the Movimiento de Apoyo al Campesino (Peasant Support Movement) and the members of trade unions funded by Sendic in poverty-stricken rural zones. It grew in proportion to the ascending powers of Uruguay's military, which culminated in a notoriously oppressive dictatorship between 1973 and 1984.

The movement began by staging the robbing of banks, gun clubs and other businesses in the early 1960s, then distributing stolen food and money among the poor in Montevideo. It took as slogan "Words divide us; action unites us" <1>.

At the beginning, it abstained from armed actions and violence; they have always made clear about not being a guerrilla group but a political movement; the eventual use of violent means would be made according to strategy and possibilities. In June 1968, President Jorge Pacheco, trying to suppress labour unrest, enforced a state of emergency and repealed all constitutional safeguards. The government imprisoned political dissidents, used torture during interrogations and brutally repressed demonstrations. The Tupamaro movement engaged then in political kidnappings, "armed propaganda" and assassinations. Of particular note are the kidnapping of powerful bank manager Pereyra Rebervel and of the British ambassador to Uruguay, Geoffrey Jackson, as well as the assassination of Dan Mitrione, the FBI agent documented to have taught techniques of torture to police forces in various Latin American countries. A very close friend to President Jorge Pacheco, the banker Pereyra Rebervel was highly unpopular, having "once killed a newsboy for selling a paper attacking him." He was released four days later, unharmed but a bit fatter. According to Langguth, the "poor in Montevideo were quoted as joking, 'Attention, Tupamaros! Kidnap me!'" <1>.

The peak of the Tupamaros was in 1970 and 1971. During this period they made liberal use of their Cárcel del Pueblo (or People's Prison) where they held those that they kidnapped and interrogated them, without using torture, before making the results of these interviews public. In 1971 over 100 imprisoned Tupamaros escaped the Punta Carretas prison. In the same year, in an uncleared episode, Pascasio Báez, a rural laborer that accidentally discovered one of their hideouts was killed.

Nonetheless, the movement was hampered by a series of events including important strategic gaffes and the betrayal of high-ranking Tupamaro Héctor Amodio Pérez, and the army's counteroffensive, which included the Escuadrón de la Muerte (Death squad), police officers who were granted repressive powers to deal with Tupamaros.

Along with police forces trained by the US Office of Public Safety (OPS), the Uruguayan military unleashed a bloody campaign of mass arrests and selected disappearances, dispersing those guerrillas who were not killed or arrested. Their usage of torture was particularly effective, and by 1972 the MLN had been severely weakened. Its principal leaders were imprisoned under terrible conditions for the next 12 years.

Despite the diminished threat, the civilian government of Juan María Bordaberry ceded government authority to the military in July, 1973 in a bloodless coup that led to further repression against the population and the suppression of all parties. The following month, the Tupamaros formed the Revolutionary Coordinating Junta with other leftwing groups pursuing urban guerrilla warfare in the Southern Cone. The following year, various South American regimes responded with the collaborative, international counterinsurgency campaign known as Operation Condor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupamaros

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChangoLoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Mujica on Chavez
http://m.lanacion.com.ar/1173730-no-se-que-ideologia-tienen-los-kirchner

Part of the interview with other comments from an article in english:
http://en.mercopress.com/2009/09/15/mujica-repentant-for-condemning-uruguay-to-endure-military-dictatorship

It is a much longer interview. I took the part where he talks about Chavez because I find it to be very representative of my point of view. Maybe you will understand that Latin American left is very critical and divided concerning Chavez's model.

And also, you'll find some quotes concerning his views on state intervention at the end.

...............

-¿Le preocupa el papel de Hugo Chávez?/ Are you worried about Chavez's role?

-El problema que tiene Chávez es que habla demasiado. Hay que hablar menos./ The problem Chavez has is that he speaks too much. He has to speak less.

-Casi como Fidel Castro, ¿no?/ Almost like Fidel Castro, isn't it?

-No, pero Fidel es mucho más sabio./ No, but Fidel is a lot wiser

-Más allá de cuánto habla, se le cuestionan sus avances contra la libertad de expresión, la educación, la propiedad privada. ¿Cómo se lleva usted con la peor faceta de Chávez?/ Besides of how much he talks, he's been questionned for advancing against freedom of expression, education and private property. How do you get along with the worst side of Chavez?

-Eso va a durar un tiempo. Le tengo simpatía porque él está dando respuestas sociales a mucha gente pobre. Es un país de locura./ That is going to last for a while. I feel sympathy for him because he's giving social answers to many people. Venezuela is a mad country.

-¿Y si las formas no son las mejores?/ And if the ways/forms are not the best?

-No son las más puras ni cosa que se les parezca, pero había gente que tenía una forma más pura y se robó todo. Venezuela debe de ser uno de los países más robados de la Tierra./
The forms (of Chavez) are not the most pure nor anything that would look pure, but there were people in Venezuela who had purer forms and they stole everything. Venezuela must be one of the most robbed countries on earth.

-Por lo visto, si es elegido, piensa mantener y profundizar la relación con Chávez./ So it looks that if you are elected you are going to mantain and deepen the relationship with Chavez.

-Para nosotros, tiene importancia. Somos dependientes del petróleo. Y Venezuela importa tres veces toda la leche en polvo que produce Conaprole . En cuanto al manejo de ciertas cosas, yo a él le dije: "Mirá que vos no construís ningún socialismo. Acá te va quedar una burocracia que sabés lo que es, ¿no?"/
It's important for us. We depend on oil. And Venezuela imports 3 times all the powder milk that Conaprole produces. Concerning his managing of certain things, I told Chavez: "Look, you are not constructing any socialism. The only thing that will remain in Venezuela is a bureaucracy and you know what that's like, isn't it?"

-¿Y qué le contestó Chávez?/ And what did Chavez answered?

-¡Qué quiere que me diga! Yo no lo voy a convencer. Yo le digo lo que pienso./ What do you want him to answer! I'm not going to convince him. I tell him what I think.
..............

The role of the state for Mujica:

"If belonging to the left means defending a strong government intervention in the economy and a strong state tendency in economic affairs, that's not for me"

"I'm more a libertarian than a man who thinks the state is the solution. My Socialist ideas support self-management and I don't mix it with the power of the state. The job of government is to help with social distribution, to avoid the accumulation of social rust-belts which the market can't address, and they finish being extremely dear for the rest of the community".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I like this guy too
I like the libertarian angle, hope he legalizes pot as soon as he gets in. But I do remember those guys were pretty violent. I was in BBAA in 1979 and almost got blown up by their local branch. And to top it off the local secret police thugs came by the following week and almost kidnapped me. I got lucky because I was out playing basketball when they came for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Uruguay’s Mujica Has 45.5% Support Ahead of Election, Poll Says
Uruguay’s Mujica Has 45.5% Support Ahead of Election, Poll Says
By Bill Faries

Oct. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Former Uruguayan guerilla Jose Mujica leads opposition candidate and ex-President Luis Alberto Lacalle ahead of the country’s Oct. 25 presidential elections, according to a poll by Montevideo-based Equipos Mori.

Mujica, of the ruling Frente Amplio coalition, has 45.5 percent support compared with 27 percent for the National Party’s Lacalle, Equipos Mori said on its Web site. Colorado Party leader Pedro Bordaberry is in third place with 14.3 percent. Another 7.4 percent of voters are undecided. A candidate needs 50 percent support to avoid a Nov. 29 run-off.

The results of the poll are in line with a survey published yesterday by Grupo Radar, which showed Mujica with 44.7 percent support compared with 28.7 percent for Lacalle.

The Equipos Mori survey of 1,200 people was conducted Oct. 15 to Oct. 18 and has a margin of error of 2.8 percentage points, the pollster said.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=at2ombD8b7QM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Economist: The mystery behind Mujica's mask
The mystery behind Mujica's mask
Oct 22nd 2009 | MONTEVIDEO
From The Economist print edition

The ruling Broad Front’s flower-growing ex-revolutionary is well ahead in the presidential race. But how far left would he push Uruguay if elected?


THE son of a dictator, neoliberalism’s booster-in-chief and a roly-poly former guerrilla, who, after 14 years in prison, grows flowers on a small farm and swears by vegetarianism. That is how some Uruguayans characterise the options they will face on October 25th when they choose a new president and Congress. The latest presidential polls show Pedro Bordaberry of the Colorado Party and the unfortunate family background trailing far behind Luis Alberto Lacalle of the centre-right National Party. In turn Mr Lacalle, who was president in 1990-95, trails the green-fingered José Mujica of the ruling, soft-left Broad Front coalition by 18 points. Weeks ago, a run-off between the two main candidates looked inevitable; now there is a chance Mr Mujica will win in one round.

That is because the pool of undecided voters has swollen. Mr Lacalle has lost support since the primary elections in June. Uruguayans are a traditional, well-mannered bunch. Some have taken offence at the way Mr Lacalle refers to those claiming welfare benefits. Mr Mujica has also let his tongue slip, but has nevertheless retained his popularity. In a long interview published as a book, for instance, he calls Argentina “a nation of morons”—forgetting that without the votes of Uruguayans living in Argentina, his party would have faced a run-off in 2004. They could prove as influential this time. Such unpresidential comments may hurt him more in a second round, in which Mr Lacalle can expect the backing of the Colorados.

Unlike previous elections during the country’s current period of democracy, this one is overshadowed by the success of the incumbent president rather than by his shortcomings. It is also the first in which the Broad Front—which had never won the presidency until 2004 but has gained roughly 1% of the vote each year for the past 20 years—can be judged on its record rather than its aspirations.

In almost five years as president, Tabaré Vázquez, and his like-minded finance minister (until 2008), Danilo Astori, stuck to economic orthodoxy. As commodity prices soared and the economy recoiled from a recession in 2000-03, they tripled foreign investment, cut poverty and unemployment, cut public debt from 79% of GDP to 60% and kept inflation steady.

More:
http://www.economist.com/world/americas/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14700728
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Judi, listen to Tupamaro interrogating Mitrione


Fresh out of the university here in the States, I went to work in Buenos Aires when the Tupamaros were at their apex across the Rio de la Plata in Montevideo.

One day our office in Montevideo received a phone tip from the Tupamaros that there was "something" under the second-story stairwell of a large store named the Galleria Americas in the heart of Montevideo. It was a tape of the Tupas interrogating Mitrione, then captive.

The tape was one of those reel-to-reel machine tapes used back in those days. The interrogation was long, about four hours of tape, and it was all in English.

I was sent to Montevideo to help transcribe the tape, but because it was so long, our head office in New York instructed up to urgently send the tape so it would be fully transcribed. In New York, the text was given to news organization for broadcasting. London was very interested in it because the British ambassador, Goffrey Jackson, had also been kidnapped by the Tupas. He was released after eight months in captivity.

Sometime back I found a very brief youtube video of Mitrione being questioned. One of my big regrets now is that I did not make a copy of the full tape.

You can hear his voice before he was executed here;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyUk_YRdiXU

Here is the Nixon administration reaction, of course all lies and propaganda;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIodEJ_EcY8

There are other video about the Tupas on the same site, most in Spanish. I also recommend the movie "State of Siege" if you have not seen it.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another Tupamaro anecdote

Judi, did not see your post #3 with the Mitrione youtubes you also included. Sorry about that.
-----------------------------
One day the Uruguayan police held a news conference in Montevideo to dispel reports that Tupamaro prisoners were being tortured. I was able to get in with a Uruguayan TV team that worked for ITN television in London.

The police brought out an attractive young lady who was a member of the Tupas. Her name was Lucia Topolansky. The police chief, who was named Alexandro Otero, ordered her to roll up her sleeves to show that she did not have needle marks on her arms after someone asked if she had been administered truth-serum shots.

She said, "No," and did not roll up her sleeves.

There was nothing the police chief could do because the conference was being filmed for television. The people at the news conference cracked up.

Anyway, Mujica's wife is now Lucia Topolansky. They were married just a couple of years ago but had been partners since they were both released from prison. She has been reported to be much more hard-core leftist then Mujica, who has mellowed out over the years into a Lula da Silva-style leftist.


Lucia and Pepe enjoy a sweet


Campaign sign with Pepe and Lucia's names.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Amazing story, rabs. What a couple. They've been through so much together, haven't they?
Looking for photos, I've seen tons of them together. They seem to be a real partnership, no doubt about it.

It looks as if the public is fond of both of them, too.

Saw that Lucia Topolansky became a senator, herself, and has also been active in politics.

http://www.radio36.com.uy.nyud.net:8090/imagenes/2007/03/20/82%20LUCIA%20MUJICA.JPG

http://farm1.static.flickr.com.nyud.net:8090/52/156190899_2a5224633e.jpg

Your posts with Maria Lamoretti in Argentina were amazing during the 2000 CNN conversations. Was startled even learning people were corresponding actively from that far away. You had so many shared, confirmed experiences, and observations. It was wonderful getting a quick shot of information on subjects which had been concealed for so long.

So much horrendous upheaval in LatAm fast and furious history you and people like Maria, and Larry from Chile lived through was NEVER known even here. It's a crime, in every way, that although this country was so intimately involved in financing and supporting these monstrosities, doing the things people like Kissinger are trying to hide now, trying to live down, attempting to explain away, passing the buck, our own media got played like a bunch of violins. They were open channels of nothing but propaganda, keeping the US public completely ignorant, and blissfully unaware. What we DID hear and read was disinformation.

People had no idea Presidents involved this country in grotesque conflicts against the people in this hemisphere while also destroying so many human lives in VietNam and Laos and Cambodia.

I'm looking forward to finding more information on "Pepe" Mujica, now, and Lucia Topolansky. A book on their lives would be amazing.

She's one strong person. Only belief can give someone that kind of personal strength. Belief based on personal experience, and a deep understanding of people and behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC