May 22, 2008
Colombia: What did Interpol find in the laptops?
http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=1543"...The Colombians asked Interpol to examine the files. Interpol released its report on May 15, admitting there was no evidence the Colombians tampered with the files. But the report also said there was no proof there was no tampering...
And if you read the Interpol report carefully, as you said, they say that, in fact. They also say that what they call the chain of custody—this is a sort of technical term that forensic experts use—the chain of custody was broken between March 1 and March 3. And, in fact, during that 48-hour period, the computer was under the control of the Ministry of Defense and an elite anti-terrorist squad. And, in fact, the Interpol report says that the Colombian government had direct access to those computers in that 48-hour period.
ESCOBAR: In the middle of the report, they say that some documents, they have different date stamps on them as well. So this proves that they could have been tampered.
HYLTON: Absolutely. They could have been tampered with. And the only source that says they were not tampered with is the interested party, which is to say the Colombian government itself. So what this is really all about is manufacturing threats.
(CLIP BEGINS)
RONALD KENNETH NOBLE, SECRETARY GENERAL, INTERPOL: The volume of this data would correspond to 39.5-million pages in Microsoft Word—39.5-million pages. It would take more than 1,000 years—more than 1,000 years—to read all the data if one person read 100 pages per day.
(CLIP ENDS)
ESCOBAR: So how could the Colombian government read them in two or three days?..."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3329729&mesg_id=3329729"Peace Patriot (1000+ posts) Thu May-29-08 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, ain't it curious! But what makes you think the Raul Reyes laptops were secure?
Interpol Notes Improper Initial Handling of FARC Laptops
By Constanza Vieira
"Using their forensic tools, they (the Interpol experts) found a total of 48,055 files for which the timestamps indicated that they had either been created, accessed, modified or deleted as a result of the direct access to the eight seized exhibits by Colombian authorities between the time of their seizure on 1 March 2008 and 3 March 2008 at 11:45 a.m."
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=42391 This is the part of the Interpol report that the Associated Pukes don't quote--and, indeed, deliberately ignore and blackhole. 48,055 files! They use the opener of the report--that the Colombian military didn't alter anything after they notified Interpol that they wanted them to analyze the laptops. They omit what the Colombian military did before that date. Interpol very strictly only analyzed ownership, they said. They even hired non-Spanish speakers as the analysts. They had nothing to say about the contents of the files. Nothing! Neither to describe nor verify. And the two days of insecurity, during which the Colombian military altered 48,055 files, made the laptops useless as evidence in a court of law, according to the Interpol report..."