Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Placenta Returned to Mother on Judge's orders....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Activism » Pro-Choice Group Donate to DU
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 01:44 AM
Original message
Placenta Returned to Mother on Judge's orders....
Edited on Fri Jul-20-07 01:45 AM by bliss_eternal
Placenta returned to mother on judge’s orders
New mom had plans to ingest the uterine lining, but then decided to bury it


Updated: 4:58 p.m. PT July 19, 2007
LAS VEGAS - A woman has won a court fight to keep the placenta after her daughter’s birth. She had planned to grind it up and ingest it as a way to fight postpartum depression, but now plans to bury it.

Clark County District Court Judge Susan Johnson granted a preliminary injunction Tuesday, ordering Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center in southern Nevada to return the placenta to Anne Swanson.

Hospital officials said they will comply

----------snip-----------------

taken from:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19859122/wid/11915773?gt1=10212

So apparently we also have to fight for what comes AFTER a birth, too? :shrug:
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why on earth did this wind up in court?
Edited on Fri Jul-20-07 08:57 AM by supernova
If she requested that it be returned to her, then that should have happened. (Personally, the whole I idea gives me the willies, but she had the right.)

edit: Sometimes people get their gallstones and other surgical detritus afterwards, so I don't see what was so unusual about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I wondered the same thing...
...it wasn't clear from the article why this was an issue. It did state that usually it's considered biohazard and they get rid of it (in that hospital/area), but I still wasn't clear on how it ended in court. :shrug:

I thought I'd heard that too--that patients sometimes keep remnants from surgical procedures. Wondering how much of this has to do with the fact we are talking about a woman and birth. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whoa
There is no reason a women can't keep her own placenta. Not to my taste certainly (pun intended). I do think proper care and containment should be taken to prevent bacteria and other things growing, as well as ensuring HIV and other infections are not present, but so presumably does the women in question. Geez.

What's next, confiscating used menstrual products? (I can see it now, the menstrual product police, full bio gear-- HEY Dumb women, that's BIO HAZARD stuff!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That was my thought as well.
How in the hell did we get to this point, where women's bodies are biohazards, but genetically modified food isn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. it really is a biohazard
People may get teeth and gallstones returned to them -- but those are not tissue. You don't get your leg returned to you when it's amputated.

I horked up a really enormous blood clot when I haemorrhaged a week after my tonsillectomy. (Tonsillectomy in an adult is way more life-threatening than a first-trimester abortion, btw.) There is no way I would, or should, have been allowed to take it home. Or the tonsils themselves.

There's nothing mystical about a placenta, for pity's sake. It's a hunk of human tissue. I don't see any particular reason why anyone should be permitted to wander off with it.

Now there was a situation in Australia (could have been New Zealand) a few years ago when an Aboriginal woman requested her placenta, to be dealt with according to customary/religious belief. It's reasonable to make exceptions in such cases. In Canada, Sikh members of the RCMP are permitted to wear turbans instead of Stetsons, for example, but RCMP members whose religions do not involve wearing particular garb would not be permitted to use their headgear to make a fashion statement.

It's a difficult line -- why should an Aboriginal woman be permitted to deal with her placenta according to religious/customary belief, but not some white anglo-saxon woman whose crystal or spirit guide was telling her she needed to make soup out of it and feed it to the wolves?

Well, because in the first instance the right in issue is collective, not individual. The people have a collective right to their existence and their autonomy, and their culture is the expression of that right. The individual's actions in that case are the exercise of a collective right to exist, not of an individual right to dispose of one's body bits as one chooses.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Activism » Pro-Choice Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC