|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 06:41 PM Original message |
You simply cannot make this shit up. (ref: Obama admin / WikiLeaks) |
Refresh | +26 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. They can't know that the contractors they're budgeting for procure children for dignitaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bobbieo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 06:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Yup - those Afghan warlords have to have their 'dancing boys'.Part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
2. Not actually as deranged as it seems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. No, that means as long as they have the proper clearance and they are accessing them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
subsuelo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
3. I wonder how the Bush admin would have reacted to Wikileaks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. This sounds like a faculty member I used to work with... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-10-10 11:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. That sounds very real to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. Its almost as if they're begging them to look |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
TheMadMonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 08:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Wouldn't suprise me if they were. To weed out independent thinkers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
7. Help please - are there classified documents in the leaks - they talk about it, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 08:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. 11,000 out of over 250,000 are classified secret. The rest unclassified and confidential n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
martymar64 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
8. Don't look Ethel!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BadgerKid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 09:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Too late!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 09:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
12. Okay so you, me and the Taliban will know more than federal employees and contractors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-10-10 11:19 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Nothin' but the best from this administration... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-10-10 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
15. and tell the firemen not to look at the flames. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC