Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did obama say this will help the economy and that when we make tough choices

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:37 PM
Original message
Why did obama say this will help the economy and that when we make tough choices
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 10:40 PM by xultar
To bring the deficit down well see that we cannot afford the tax cuts for the rich...this shit will add to the fucking budget.

If we can't afford them in 2 years we couldnt afford them now.

Why did Obama say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. it's called sucking up
to the wrong people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just remember this when he tries selling austerity next year
Every time he talks deficits, remember the $700B added by the wealthy tax breaks.

When he talks about "burying our children and grand children in debt", remember those tax cuts.

As he talks about "shared sacrifice", remember he expects everyone BUT the wealthy to do the sacrificing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. $700 billion is incorrect
The number $700 billion refers to a ten year extension (i.e., another decade), not a two year extension. That number (for over $250,000) is roughly $100 billion. Add the utterly awful estate tax provision, and we're up to roughly $120 billion. The majority of the tax credits are for working class tax credits and unemployment extensions, together with other stimulative credits.

Where did you get the number $700 billion? Easy. This was a number invented by the administration and the Democrats in Congress in order to argue most forcefully against permanent extension of all the tax cuts for all brackets. They basically said, "If we permanently extend everything, it will cost $700 billion over the next ten years." So, somehow that argument has transformed itself into "any extension of the full Bush tax cuts will cost $700 billion." It ain't true.

Now, that doesn't mean that extending the tx cuts over $250,000 isn't a terrible fucking idea, and a deficit buster of first order. Tax cuts for the wealthy are the shittiest and most ineffective form of stimulus. But the majority of the money here is not in the tax extensions over $250,000 and the estate tax. It is in working class tax cr3edits, unemployment insurance, and various business credits meant to create jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's no doubt that this will hurt the deficit
It's an odd phenomenon. Whenever I read one of the so-called Catfood Commission threads, I see a dozen posters citing Krugman, exclaiming that there is no deficit problem we have to deal with for at least a decade, and that it is not a bad idea to run deficits in a recovery, and everybody's a deficit Keynesian. Then, we hit one of these tax cut deal threads, and there are a dozen posters - oddly enough, many of them the same people - arguing that these deficits are crazy, and must be dealt with immediately, and suddenly everybody's a deficit hawk.

To be fair, it's quite true that deficit reduction should proceed by massively increasing taxes on the top brackets, and massively reducing military spending. It's also quite true that tax cuts - especially for the top brackets, have little stimulative effect. So I can see how this back and forth might be motivated. At the same time, it would be more coherent if people decided whether they were deficit Keynesians or deficit hawks, at least for the purpose of consistency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Total bullshit. Obama said ignore arithmetic
and basic economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. I believe he was talking about the extention of UE benefits. THAT
money goes right back into the system.

Unlike the tax-cuts, which aren't doing that.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. the payroll tax cut and the earned income extension also benefit in that way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. you're right-
thanks
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. he was referring to the negative effects on this bad economy
. . . of increasing the incomes of so many wage earners right now. There are several economists who agree that allowing the tax breaks that affect tens of millions of Americans to expire right now would have a detrimental effect on the already faltered economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. The missing piece
is that the President is planning to address the deficit so we'll see going forward. The shortfall from the payroll tax holiday has to be made up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Obama stated openly that these were going to have bad effects on the deficit
And that he didn't want them. That's what he said in his statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC