|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:27 PM Original message |
Julian Assange is the new Ralph Nader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Violet_Crumble (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. 'Where was Assange when Bush was in office?' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 11:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
56. bullshit- Assange didn't release this kind of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:06 AM Response to Reply #56 |
60. How do you know what leaks he had in the first two years? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Violet_Crumble (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. Oops. Posting hiccup! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:31 PM Original message |
When did he call for Bush to resign? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Violet_Crumble (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
9. I don't know and don't care... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 11:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
55. I don't care who is embarrassed. I care about who is endangered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmilyKent (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
12. Wikileaks only launched in 2006. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 11:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
50. How do you know he wasn't given plenty of material on Bush? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:18 AM Response to Reply #50 |
66. If he had the material and didn't use it, then he wasn't "doing exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. Deleted message |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Time will tell. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
4. Alas, Assange can't run for president. I'd happily vote for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Millions happily voted for Nader, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. I voted for him in '08 and I'm not so happy with the last 10 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Myrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Funny because Nader didn't decide the 2000 election, SCOTUS did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:45 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. exactly!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:26 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. The election hinged on 500 votes in Florida, where Nader drew 95.000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:15 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. And who stopped the recount? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 11:51 PM Response to Reply #31 |
52. As I said, they wouldn't have had the case if Nader hadn't been on the ballot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 10:18 PM Response to Reply #26 |
46. so you are arguing for a complete 2 party system? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 11:50 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. No, I'm not. But I think people should use their common sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puregonzo1188 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:43 AM Response to Reply #26 |
69. And every single one of the TEN candidates on the Florida ballots got over 500 votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 06:13 PM Response to Reply #26 |
79. you have just proven the point in my post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:03 AM Response to Reply #18 |
58. Deleted message |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:56 AM Response to Reply #58 |
77. Don't look now, friend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 06:15 PM Response to Reply #58 |
80. Proudly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. The election didn't hinge on 500,000 national votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:48 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Jeb Bush set out to fix Florida well before the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:04 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I seriously believe that Jeb Bush couldn't have taken that election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:16 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. You realize thousands of those votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 09:04 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. Thousands of OTHER votes were caged before the election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 09:09 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. I am jus pointing out where those votes went |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 09:17 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. If the spread was big enough -- such as 95,000 votes -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 09:19 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Keep repeating that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 11:46 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Wrong. Those were 95,000 actual, counted UNCAGED votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 11:48 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. So it is ok they caged voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:04 AM Response to Reply #49 |
59. Of course it isn't okay that they caged any voters. But even with the caging |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:06 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Here is your hint of the day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:19 AM Response to Reply #61 |
67. They marked their ballots mistakenly, so their votes were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:55 AM Response to Reply #27 |
75. You can say "crap" here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 10:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
47. Nader gave SCOTUS the opportunity to do its deed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FamousBlueRaincoat (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 09:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
41. this is funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
7. Deleted message |
Union Scribe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
8. Both wrongly hated by apologists for the status quo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
11. I can't agree with you on this, pnwmom. I'm grateful for the 'sunlight' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
13. For all your posts slamming Assange, you still don't understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Myrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. +10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
16. Assange is your new White Whale, you mean n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:10 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Careful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
17. hee-hee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayakjohnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
19. Your post is a reach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
20. I disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kgnu_fan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
22. Ralph Nader is a hero too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrendaBrick (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 06:23 PM Response to Reply #22 |
81. I agree - and always has been for several decades now! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
23. At last! A new head Devil for you to slander the next 10 years! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
25. Fail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
29. Um, not even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
30. Wake me up when vehicle safety standards come up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. This thread is hilarious. What if wikileaks exposes the dangers of the Corvair!??! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:24 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Don't forget the Pinto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:30 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Wow - I can't even imagine all that you've seen as an EMT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:51 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. A lot of those old cars end up all along the border |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:08 AM Response to Reply #30 |
62. Maybe you should be studying the history of vote caging |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
35. If Obama isn't re-elected in 2012 it's because of WikiLeaks and Julian Assange! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
37. You're just kidding .... right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
38. "Obama will never be able to put Hillary in a V.P. slot" What the fuck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:10 AM Response to Reply #38 |
63. Because many here have speculated that if Palin were ever to become |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:30 AM Response to Reply #63 |
68. That you just "happened" to dredge up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
45. oh, you mean hated irrationally? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
53. No, he's not. He's a guy who is doing the job of journalism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:11 AM Response to Reply #53 |
65. He's not a journalist. He's a dumper. No journalist would say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:14 AM Response to Reply #65 |
71. That's exacty what the New York Times, the Guardian.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:48 AM Response to Reply #65 |
76. Of course, he's a journalist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
54. If there were more Naders out there, there wouldn't be a need for any Assanges. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackDragna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
57. Maybe you haven't noticed.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
64. Interesting analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puregonzo1188 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
70. Remember when Bush was President? Remember all the DUers who insisted the difference between |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:10 AM Response to Original message |
72. He really bothers you. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:12 AM Response to Original message |
73. I disagree, Assange didn't give us Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:35 AM Response to Original message |
74. Get over it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:58 AM Response to Original message |
78. Your continued demonstration of your lack of knowledge of WikiLeaks, which got up & running in 2007 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 05:37 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC