Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tax Cuts Update: Despite Schumer's Threat, There's Little Appetite To Let Them Expire - HuffPo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:36 PM
Original message
Tax Cuts Update: Despite Schumer's Threat, There's Little Appetite To Let Them Expire - HuffPo
Tax Cuts Update: Despite Schumer's Threat, There's Little Appetite To Let Them Expire
Sam Stein - HuffingtonPost
First Posted: 12- 6-10 12:21 PM | Updated: 12- 6-10 12:21 PM

<snip>

WASHINGTON -- This past weekend, as the White House and congressional lawmakers negotiated away a temporary extension of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, dejected liberals were offered one last droplet of hope.

Amidst the talk of capitulation, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) suggested that rather than extend current rates for two years in exchange for other tax-cut goodies and unemployment insurance, the party might simply let all the tax cuts expire. After all, the president could come back next Congress and build his own package of middle-class tax cuts, branded under the Obama (not Bush) name.

"There are lots of people in our caucus who do have that appetite ," said the New York Democrat.

If that appetite needed further whetting, it came Monday morning in the form of an op-ed from The New York Times's Paul Krugman.

"Mr. Obama should draw a line in the sand, right here, right now," wrote Krugman, the earnest voice of the progressive masses. "If Republicans hold out, and taxes go up, he should tell the nation the truth, and denounce the blackmail attempt for what it is.

"Yes, letting taxes go up would be politically risky. But giving in would be risky, too -- especially for a president whom voters are starting to write off as a man too timid to take a stand."

Yet acts of political defiance -- despite Krugman's wishes or Schumer's provocations -- don't appear to be in the cards. On the Hill and in the White House, the notion that Democrats would let the Bush tax rates revert to previous levels is considered, to put it bluntly, a bluff. And not even all Democrats have been handed the right script.

<snip>

More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/06/despite-schumers-threat-a_n_792544.html

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Real life is not going by the script.
However to try to get people to follow scripts, the multiple ways things can happen all look like they were part of a script.


Think of a road with 4 branches, at the start of the road is a sign that says you will see something, anything, a tree with a car in it.

Then you pick a branch, and there is a tree with a car in it!!!!!!!!!

You think it is fate.





You don't know that every road...

Had a tree with a car in it somewhere.

Fate is a delusion, you do not have to follow a script, and you don't. The reason some things want you to think you follow a script is so you say to yourself that anything you do is useless and you stop trying to do anything.

Following a script is despair based, knowing that you have free will and choice is truth and hope.



I am not where I should be, or in my place, but where ever I am, I will do the same type of things. In a persons life, a person can put a car in a tree no matter what path they choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, despite the posturing
there is a Senate, and they can't blame President Obama for their votes.

Do people really think that the votes on Saturday show that Democrats want the tax cuts to expire?

Schumer made his statement after a vote on his amendment, which increased the threshold to $1 million, failed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Where are the "teabaggers" on this? Are they pressuring Republicans to not at 700 Billion
dollars to the deficit? I thought they were all about "stop saddling our Children and Grand Children with dept"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does the Senate bill have to go back to the House?

Maybe we can get Pelosi to block it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. this gutless shit is
making me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC