Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Sonia Sotomayor: Fire from a Hot Bench (she is still Obama's best decision)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:04 AM
Original message
Justice Sonia Sotomayor: Fire from a Hot Bench (she is still Obama's best decision)

Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States
Nominated by Barack Obama on June 1, 2009


Phillips was representing the State of California and arguing that a federal court order mandating the state to reduce its prison population by 40,000 over a two-year period was “extraordinary and unprecedented." He said the state was working to remedy the situation on its own with new construction and that the order would force the release of thousands of prisoners prematurely.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Sonia Sotomayor pounced. Ginsburg pointed out that one case challenging the conditions in the prison had been pending for 20 years. “How much longer do we have to wait?” she said.

Then it was Justice Sotomayor’s turn. She asked Phillips to give her “concrete details” of what California, mired in a fiscal crisis, could do on its own to alleviate the crowding. “Slow down from the rhetoric,” she warned Phillips.

Later she asked him: “When are you going to avoid the needless deaths that were reported in this record? When are you going to avoid or get around people sitting in their feces for days in a dazed state? When are you going to get to a point where you are going to deliver care that is going to be adequate?”

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2010/12/justice-sonia-sotomayor-fire-from-a-hot-bench.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. I like her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I thought she was a crypto-corporate fascist plant?
After all, that's the shit DUers were saying about her when Obama picked her. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I liked her after I dug into her work, Kagan I was a bit more concerned about but
a bit isn't that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. And yet, people will continue recycling the same misinformation and smears. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think there is quite a bit less of that going on about her today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. well, I never said that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. The people who did will never own up to it.
And no one will learn the lesson of that whole story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. dig 'em up and call 'em out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. So what to make of this? She didn't find against a corporation.
She upheld a federal ruling against a state government. This doesn't particularly make her progressive.

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. Note that Scalia told her, "Don't be rhetorical."
Listen, end of clip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. That is so assholic of him--what she was recapping was
the actual physical conditions of the prisoners, which could be construed as facts to be taken into account, but Scalia just doesn't seem to have patience for anything that implies concerns for human conditions. If the law was ever an ass, a picture of him would be the ideal illustration of that concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Right, a BIG ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dimbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Fold this article over several times and use it to slap people who
think there's only one party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. McCain would have sent up Bybee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. She is excellent.
I'd be completely happy with the President if he confined his activities solely to playing basketball and appointing people to the Federal judiciary. Those seem to be the two things he does well.

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC