|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 04:55 PM Original message |
Wikileaks Might Have Helped Stop 9/11 Say Two Federal Agents |
Refresh | +99 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. Was that conversation of the two individuals leaked too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 05:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I'm not sure which conversation you are referring to? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. Somewhere, in some vault in Langley, the real history of 9/11 is buried. I want to see THOSE files. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 05:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 05:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I think a vast majority of the world's population would agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 05:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Truth will out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 05:31 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. We already know the truth. I want to see the documents . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 05:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Are there such documents that have been classified? I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 05:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Tenet made an unscheduled trip to Crawford on August 23 or 24, and then perjured himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 05:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Thank you, I remember that now. The visit to Crawford. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 01:09 AM Response to Reply #10 |
21. I just got back and have had time to read your journal more thoroughly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 07:51 PM Response to Reply #21 |
46. True ... and remember that '01 was Coleen Rowley's second time around on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rschop (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 02:44 PM Response to Reply #21 |
53. It is even worse that you could ever imagine! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rschop (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 02:53 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. More details in this information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:01 PM Response to Reply #53 |
60. First, it's clear that Tenet lied about talking to Bush. A blatant lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rschop (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #53 |
68. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 09:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. True but I love corroboration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 05:30 AM Response to Reply #7 |
52. Who killed JFK? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
5. . . . and a kick . . . .. n/t . . .because that says it all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
11. Kicked and recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 08:32 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. You're welcome, Uncle Joe ~ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
13. 'Official' 9/11 conspiracy theory tag team up from the Dungeon in 3..2...1... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
14. given how the corporate/totalitarian agenda has prospered via 9/11, no wonder they hate Wikileaks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
17. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-10 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
18. Wikileaks should be looked as a new cornerstone for building a truly free press.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 12:36 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I read somewhere today that there is another group, formerly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 07:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
47. Interesting ... especially if they're able to hang on -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
noise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
20. In theory 9/11 is a good example of what Wikileaks is trying to expose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 01:15 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I had not heard that Assange denounced 9/11 skepticism. That puts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
noise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 01:27 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Here is his comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 02:11 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. I'm not sure that he was saying he believed the official story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
cpwm17 (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 05:59 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Assange's discounting of crazy 9-11 conspiracies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 07:03 PM Response to Reply #24 |
42. Didn't know they had published Bilderberg "meeting notes" ... will try to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 05:15 AM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Thnx for posting that link - however, Roston obscures a couple important points: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 07:05 PM Response to Reply #20 |
43. Also buttressed by the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
23. Yeah, we would have been able to stop Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and the rest of the necons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 02:56 AM Response to Original message |
26. K & R nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Anakin Skywalker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
29. Imagine that, playa! They should've listened to their own agents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SpiralHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 08:01 AM Response to Original message |
30. "Smirk." - xCommander AWOL (R) & RepubliCrony Chickenhawks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
31. That cover is IRONIC, given how timid and puerile TIME has become. LOOK at issues from 40 years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
32. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Crabby Appleton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 10:18 AM Response to Reply #32 |
71. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
33. And, applying this principle to current events, did someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 07:42 PM Response to Reply #33 |
45. +1000% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 08:57 PM Response to Reply #33 |
50. That's a good question. I hadn't thought of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 04:05 PM Response to Reply #33 |
57. I had a Cheney feeling from the beginning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Poboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
34. Recommend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
35. wikileaks could also have prevented the assisination of JFK and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 08:15 PM Response to Reply #35 |
48. You could be absolutely correct .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 10:26 PM Response to Reply #35 |
67. Yes, it could. But a truly free press could have done the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
36. As the guilty assume that the stupid populous as a whole, cannot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
37. Conspiracy theorists will go for this idea. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
noise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 05:06 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. The officials who had the information before 9/11 sat on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 07:16 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. Most intelligent people know that if there is a truly free press in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BrownieGman (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
38. Don't blame GULF WAR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
saras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
39. Depends on what they leaked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
keepfreespeechalive (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
40. Wikileaks needs our support! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-10 08:23 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. Wikileaks website HERE ... with instructions on how to donate -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 05:03 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Thanks for that. They will need a lot of support now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rschop (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
55. Could Wikileaks have preveted the attacks on 9/11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
noise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 05:41 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Where is the media on this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:32 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. That's why we need not just one, but many Wikileaks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
noise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:04 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. Here are the 9/11 Commission notes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rschop (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:19 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. Media silence and 9/11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rschop (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:11 PM Response to Reply #58 |
69. Other people main stream media could interview if they really wanted the truth about 9/11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #69 |
72. The media doesn't report on anything the government doesn't want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 10:42 AM Response to Reply #55 |
70. What If? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rschop (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-10-10 10:29 PM Response to Reply #55 |
73. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rschop (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:10 PM Response to Reply #55 |
76. Part 1: More details on "Could Wikileaks have prevented the attacks on 9/11" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rschop (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 01:04 AM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Part 2: More details on "Could Wikileaks have prevented the attacks on 9/11" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rschop (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 02:17 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. Part 3: More details on "Could Wikileaks have prevented the attacks on 9/11" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zeos3 (912 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
56. KICK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
61. Wikileaks could have stopped the War of 1812! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:22 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. So do you have any comment on what the Federal Agents, several |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:23 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. I believe I have heard about the Gorelick/Ashcroft 'wall' before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 09:08 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. I was talking about what the agents in the OP testified to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Rabrrrrrr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-10-10 10:37 PM Response to Reply #61 |
74. Hannibal never would have crossed the Alps! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-10-10 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
75. Kicking this helpful thread up. Truth helps freedom better than secrets and weapons do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC