Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senators ask Obama administration to prosecute Julian Assange "and his accomplices" for espionage!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:33 PM
Original message
Senators ask Obama administration to prosecute Julian Assange "and his accomplices" for espionage!
WikiLeaks faces more U.S. demands for prosecution
by Declan McCullagh
December 2, 2010

WikiLeaks encountered another round of criticism in Washington political circles today as the two senators who head the Senate Intelligence Committee called for the espionage prosecution of editor Julian Assange.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Kit Bond (R-Miss.) said that Assange--and, in wording that was likely designed to intimidate programmers and other volunteers aiding WikiLeaks--any of "his possible accomplices" should be charged with federal crimes.

"We believe that Mr. Assange's conduct is espionage and that his actions fall under the elements of this section of law," the senators told Attorney General Eric Holder in a letter today. "Therefore, we urge that he be prosecuted under the Espionage Act."

This follows increasingly loud criticism from other U.S. politicians as WikiLeaks continues to dribble out confidential State Department cables, a few dozen at a time on its "cablegate" Web site, in a manner that seems optimized to provoke Washington officialdom the most. Earlier this week, Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), the incoming head of the House Intelligence Committee, also called for criminal charges under the Espionage Act as well as putting WikiLeaks on the list of "terrorist" organizations that includes Al Qaeda.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20024501-38.html


--------------------------------------------

Feinstein-Bond Ask Attorney General to Prosecute WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange for Espionage

WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Christopher (Kit) Bond (R-Mo.), vice chairman of the committee, asked Attorney General Eric Holder to prosecute WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange for espionage. Following is their letter to the attorney general:

December 2, 2010

The Honorable Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
Washington, D.C. 20535

Dear Attorney General Holder:

We respectfully urge the Department of Justice (DOJ) to take action to bring criminal charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and any and all of his possible accomplices involved in the unauthorized possession and distribution of vast quantities of classified and unclassified material from the U.S. government. The unauthorized release of this information, including the recent release of approximately 250,000 State Department documents, is a serious breach of national security and could be used to severely harm the United States and its worldwide interests.

On Saturday, before the latest disclosures by WikiLeaks, the State Department’s legal adviser, Harold Koh, wrote Mr. Assange telling him that if he were “genuinely interested in seeking to stop the damage” from his actions he should: (1) ensure WikiLeaks ceases publishing any and all such materials; (2) ensure WikiLeaks returns any and all classified U.S. Government material in its possession; and (3) remove and destroy all records of this material from WikiLeaks' databases. As we know, Mr. Assange failed to take these actions, and instead proceeded to release these documents to the world at large.

We appreciate your statement earlier this week that DOJ has an “active, ongoing, criminal investigation” with regard to the WikiLeaks matter. We also understand that Private First Class Bradley E. Manning – who may have been involved in disclosing the most recent set of documents provided to WikiLeaks – has already been charged in military court with eight violations of federal criminal law, including unauthorized computer access and transmitting classified information to an unauthorized third party in violation of a section of the Espionage Act, 18 U.S.C. 793(e).

Section 793(e) of the Espionage Act states:

Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it … Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

Courts have interpreted “information relating to the national defense” to include classified and unclassified material. We believe that Mr. Assange’s conduct is espionage and that his actions fall under the elements of this section of law. Therefore, we urge that he be prosecuted under the Espionage Act.

If Mr. Assange and his possible accomplices cannot be charged under the Espionage Act (or any other applicable statute), please know that we stand ready and willing to support your efforts to “close those gaps” in the law, as you also mentioned this week. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,


Dianne Feinstein Christopher S. Bond
Chairman Vice Chairman


http://bond.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.NewsReleases&ContentRecord_id=a9616dd5-938c-2c98-9076-cbb7b63a482d




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. DiFi has not worried about prosecuting Bush?Cheney for war crimes - or for Plame? NOW she calls for
prosecution? For a whistleblower website?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. difi and her hubby pull mad coin from war crimes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. when ever dianne speaks one needs to follow the money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here it comes..."close those gaps" in the law
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is bullshit and I'm making another donation to Wikileaks.
"If Mr. Assange and his possible accomplices cannot be charged under the Espionage Act (or any other applicable statute), please know that we stand ready and willing to support your efforts to “close those gaps” in the law, as you also mentioned this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Me too - sounds like ex post facto is getting some lipstick.
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 09:47 PM by wtmusic
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. So that's what gets Feinstein exercised. Not torture, not war crimes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Feinstein - quickly turning into one of our most embarrassing Blue Dogs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. would said accomplices be people who spread security keys to Wiki-mirror sites prior to releases?
Dude, I guess I'm fucked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. yet Bob Novak wasn't indicted for outing a CIA agent.
Feinstein didn't do shit about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wonder if Hilary's attempt to steal computer passwords is related to the national defense
or if it's just theft. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. ACLU: Prosecuting WikiLeaks For Publishing Documents Would Raise Serious Constitutional Concerns
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's not even clear that Assange broke any laws, only the people who gave him the info
The only people that have clearly violated the law from what I understand in the whole wikileak's mess are the people who downloaded all of those secret documents and gave them to wikileaks. At least one of those people has already been arrested.

It sounds really flimsy to me to claim you can prosecute the programmers and volunteers aiding a website. I mean come on, there was no prosecuting of reporters for publishing the pentagon papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. "there was no prosecuting of reporters for publishing the pentagon papers." Today they might be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC