Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My apologies, I am not sure where to post this question (TSA-related)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:16 AM
Original message
My apologies, I am not sure where to post this question (TSA-related)
I have read that the TSA have the "legal authority" to levy a $10,000 "civil penalty" to passengers who refuse both the scanner and the enhanced pat down and wish to abort the security process and leave the airport rather than board their plane.

Does anyone know what statute gives them this authority? I'd like to know what the actual law is.

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's probably a little-known amendment to the Patriot Act.
That has got to be what they are going to use for this intrusion - how else do they get past the 4th amendment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I've been searching on-line all morning and can't find it anywhere.
You're probably right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's not laws...it's rules
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here's a reference to the specific law....
http://dailypaul.com/node/149419

Under 49 CFR Sec.s 1540.105 and 1540.107, as summarized in these 2004 TSA Sanction Guidelines, apparently TSA has Congressional support to fine people for refusing to submit to molestation.

Guess they might be here:

TSA Sanction Guidelines
http://www.tsa.gov/assets/pdf/Sanction_Guidance_for_Individu...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC