|
Edited on Tue Nov-16-10 08:25 PM by RandomThoughts
On the first level people don't realize that having pat downs and intrusive actions like that is actually worse then an occasional bad thing.
Sometimes bad things happen, and those that want security over freedom deserve neither.
If the people, and even the information systems had more perspective the concept of an occasional bad thing would not be that bad. As brutal as it sounds, a plane crashing once a year, is a very small thing, and not much in the totality of society. Sure such things should be avoided, but at what cost? And really does such things reduce the chances of a plane going down at all? Get some perspective. If someone says, a plane going down once in awhile is the cost of having a free society, what would you think of them? Although it really is true, and is shown with every freedom. The right to bear arms, is a freedom that cost some lives, the right to non self incrimination lets some criminals get away and hurt more people. The right to search and seizure only with warrants, lets some people get hurt, but freedom has a price.
Sometimes bad things happen, and you have to have the courage to know that and see it in perspective.
So that type of worry of total protection allows some in government to allow those policies.
But the reason those policies happen is because some that want to destroy government inside of some agencies and know it will turn people against government, the policy is not about air safety, but to show governmental overreach in peoples lives, to hurt the concept of having government.
It is overreach, and not only cowardly, but also stupid and wrong, and people are laughing at the TSA and the passengers for being dumb enough to not see why it was created, and being so cowardly that a person would allow someone to feel them up to remove some .000000000000001% chance of some bad thing happening.
Get some perspective.
|