Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBC presenter dropped because 'she was not young and pretty enough'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:25 PM
Original message
BBC presenter dropped because 'she was not young and pretty enough'
Source: The Guardian

A second Countryfile presenter axed from the BBC1 show was told by a member of the production team that she did not pass the "primetime test" because she "was not young or pretty", a tribunal heard today.

Charlotte Smith was one of four female presenters who were dropped from the rural affairs show when it switched from Sunday mornings to a new Sunday teatime slot last year.

She was giving evidence today at the tribunal in Holborn, central London, hearing an age discrimination complaint from Miriam O'Reilly, another presenter dropped from the show.

Smith, who had presented on the show for a decade, told the tribunal that she had light-heartedly suggested she could fill in on the show when it found itself short of presenters last year.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/nov/09/bbc-countryfile-presenter



Ugh, more sexism. Look at the photo of the current presenters



ESPECIALLY the man on the far right. So lemme get this straight: women have to look "young and pretty" to present a TV show, but men have it easier...as long as they can present the program effectively even with wrinkles and graying/balding hair? (which is why Dan Rather got to present the CBS Evening News even up to his early 70s). and the media wonders why women are so self-loathing of their body images.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh look at that handsome white haired young man. Brad Pitt eat your heart out. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. No, no, no, you don't get it...
This is all about casting...

You need:
1) a young energetic go-getting male to be the primary face for hard-hitting news
2) a young attractive sensitive female to show concern for the audience and handle human interest pieces
3) an old professorial male to offer "perspective" on the issues of the day
(and optionally, a jolly fat guy for weather and "light" stories)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. LOL. Yes the white haired guy provides the "gravitas" that the young energetic go-getting male
might lack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #22
38.  isn't that the same forumla used for 1950's sci-fi movies? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. One of the reasons I hate news shows
so many young women - you'd think the older ones would have more experience and hold those positions.

It's just so silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. do you count Rachel Maddow or Democracy Now as "news shows"?
Those programs are both female-hosted, but the hosts care more about reporting news than looks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Never heard of Democracy now
Rachel Maddow doesn't seem to be under 35 to me. No offense if she's younger.

I'm thinking more of the local ones - how you'll see a panel with some silver haired man and a very young woman.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Maddow was born in '73, according to Wikipedia n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Never heard of Democracy Now?
Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. You know I bet I've heard of a few things you haven't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. I don't think of Rachel as a "presenter."
She's a commentator who hosts her own show and takes very definite positions on issues. "Presenters" just read the news. I think that the vapid echo chamber pap that "presenters" read doesn't require them to be very discerning, able, or experienced. And the msm intends to keep it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. It's still an old boys club, unfortunately. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. the only news here is that the producers were honest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. People (even on DU) used to rag on Rita Cosby all the time
But I always thought it was great to see someone that wasn't Barbi Doll perfect have a successful news career.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jancantor Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. and Greta...
she is definitely not barbie doll anything. Otoh, Julianne Malveaux is achingly beautiful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. wow...how MTV of them...
BBC must be taking a page from Sky News (and yes, their on-air presenters are hotties)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. I don't like Kay Burley
Edited on Tue Nov-09-10 05:27 PM by Turborama
And I'm not talking about her looks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kay_Burley



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. i guess i was thinking more of the Sky Sports news show...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. a tad Boylesque
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well, the woman in the middle will probably have a short career.
The guy in the red jacket though, going by the guy in the blue jacket, will be set for life.

I don't care how old they are, I just want to see professionalism return to journalism. CNN seems to go out of their way to find the least professional, most fake, painted, died-hair women to host their various shows. I can't watch them. I always feel they are auditioning for some local beauty contest rather than delivering news.

Their best and most gracious and naturally beautiful, most professional female journalist was Christiane Amanpour. Other than that, I can't think of a woman there that I feel confident is a real journalist who does anything more than just read the memos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurtzapril4 Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Linda Ellerbee! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. The most unforgivable crime in our society: being an old woman. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. Young and pretty only applies to women at the BBC .........



They don't even insist on decent clothes and haircuts for
these three BBC millionaires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. That's bit of a stretch! Looks have nothing to do with it, those guys are hilarious! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. You won't get very far saying John Craven shouldn't be there
He's a legend in BBC broadcasting. For years he was the presenter of 'Newsround', a serious news programme for children, and which deserves to be mentioned alongside Sesame Street as good children's programming. He is universally known in Britain, and I think he's been with Countryfile since it started. Having him there gives the show both seriousness and accessibility.

The question is whether they were ageist by chucking the other previous presenters in favour of Baker and Bradbury; and I think they probably were. Mind you, Julia Bradbury is only 4 years younger than Michela Strachan, one of the axed presenters. And Charlotte Smith is only 2 years older than that. I suspect it was done on looks as much as anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. I was just thinking that
I can't believe they've axed Michela Strachan

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. There are fairly credible reasons for dropping her
He said he would have welcomed the former Really Wild Show presenter Strachan on the new show, but said her availability had become limited after she moved to South Africa. He said her availability was limited further because as a vegetarian, Strachan refused to present reports about the meat production process.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/nov/08/miriam-oreilly-bbc-countryfile


From 2005:

Chard still lives in Bristol, and Strachan now lives in South Africa, but they are on good terms. "Duncan and I don't have a huge amount of contact, simply because we are on different continents and don't really need to talk to each other a lot," she says. "But there is certainly no animosity there and he knows about the baby."

Strachan, 39, met Chevalier during one of her regular visits to South Africa to check on her house in Cape Town. "A friend introduced us and then, each time I came back, we'd meet. It was a hard relationship to maintain because of the distance. I was away a lot, including returning to Britain to film for my BBC series, Country File.
...
Strachan made her last trip to Britain in April to work on the Country File series, and to do voiceovers for several projects, including her new series, Elephant Diaries, the latest natural history project from award-winning film-maker Jonathan Scott, creator of the long-running Big Cat Diary, which will be first shown as part of the BBC's Africa Week in July.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/3644014/Ill-be-taking-my-baby-to-work.html


And it's true that Countryfile is not in the business of knocking farming for meat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Ta for that
Didn't realise she was outside of commuting distance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. The clowns who make these decisions should focus on trustworthy news content
& that'll attract more viewers than having one presenting the news naked. We're that desperate for substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nunyabidness Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. So?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
The chief (perhaps only?) qualifications for a "news presenter" is the ability to read a teleprompter, and how one looks. Please lets not pretend that these women who are now suing didn't get these jobs on one of those bases in the first place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. No, not true at all in O'Reilly's case
Her résumé: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/about/miriam_oreilly.shtml - reporter, producer, and presenter, "she has won the Foreign Press, Royal Television Society and British Environment Media Awards".

And Charlotte Smith came via radio, so teleprompters and looks weren't relevant: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/people/presenters/charlotte-smith/

And since she's been a producer too, it's not just about 'reading a script', before you say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bc3000 Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
34. Of course there is a double standard.
Men generally like young, pretty women. Women generally like powerful men with money. If the nature of women changes then the old guy on the right will get canned. Or if the nature of men changes then old women will start getting more TV jobs.

But before women get angry about the way things are, they should realize that it's not the fault of men that women generally don't share the same tastes as men in regards to the opposite sex. The programmers are putting people on the air that generally appeal to everyone. If that's not equality, then what is?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. Sorry, how do you know what women like?
Women like handsome,too...and young doesn't necessarily mean pretty. They most certainly wouldn't deny a man a job (if they even had that power) just because he wasn't Brad Pitt.

Women don't need to change their natures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
35. I hope she sues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
36. You don't really think people watch faux for the news? And don't
forget the boob jobs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC