|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:17 PM Original message |
Poll question: Should there be a law banning smoking within a certain distance of children? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. I think ten miles should be adequate.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. No, but there should be a law banning children within a certain disance of smokers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guy Whitey Corngood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. LOL. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 04:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
35. I might take up smoking if that becomes law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
3. No. We should give the children handguns and let them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetladybug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. If we had a law saying smokers can not be within a certain distance of children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 03:05 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Um... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GrpCaptMandrake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
4. I favor a law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. OP: SOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. To be fair, though.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. "Starting a ruckus" = inspiring a debate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GrpCaptMandrake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 04:07 PM Response to Reply #13 |
34. No. This doesn't "inspire debate" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
6. And ban cars near kids as well, and have to have windows up in traffic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
7. We cannot reist our Nanny State Ways. The Mommy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catbyte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
8. I voted no in the poll, but a law actually wouldn't be so bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Philly219 (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
9. So what happens when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. How about putting out the cigarette as soon as the kids come running up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Philly219 (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 07:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
38. If you were referring to my post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetladybug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 03:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. Hell let's teach the kiddies to hate Grandpa since he's a smoker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
10. Nobody should be allowed to subject other people to their second hand smoke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetladybug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. I hope you don't have beer farts also! haha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluetrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-10-10 04:27 AM Response to Reply #10 |
41. Hope you don't drive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
14. No, but there should be a law banning farts in my presence. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 04:23 PM Response to Reply #14 |
36. But only other people's farts. I do not find my own to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-10-10 02:44 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. My point exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
16. We should ban cars so that children aren't exposed to their emissions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cetacea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 03:47 PM Response to Reply #16 |
31. +1k |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
17. Nah, let's just issue "fresh air" suits to all people under 18. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The2ndWheel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
20. I'd support it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
23. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
24. Don't kids, you know, move around? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
25. I'd vote for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raccoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
26. There should be a law banning smoking within a certain distance of nonsmokers. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
27. Non-smokers need to get their priorities straight,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cetacea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
28. Put the money into research, re: childhood brain tumours, automobiles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
29. no, there should be a law against yuppies & their big noses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glen123098 (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
30. I dont think this is the place for the government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
32. Should the government provide public spit buckets for people who chew? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 04:24 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Well, at one time, spittoons were a common sight in courthouses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JonLP24 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-09-10 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
33. How about banning Phoenix within a certain distance of children? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluetrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-10-10 04:26 AM Response to Original message |
40. Can I get a law banning children under the age of 10 from being in public places? Also from being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC