Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New York's new optical scan system is annoying as hell, but effective.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:36 PM
Original message
New York's new optical scan system is annoying as hell, but effective.
Old folks are going to hate this.

For me, I'm indifferent.

The lever machines took no more than 30 seconds to vote, 5 if you did a party line vote. The new system has a paper trail, but it'll take you at least a 5 minutes to bubble everything in and then scan the ballot.

When I voted in '06 in Maryland, the plastic voter cards and paperless touchscreen really worried me.

I guess there is a trade-off between convenience a verifiable paper trail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kick-ass-bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not sure why we (Wake co, NC)
went from connecting an arrow to filling in ovals.

Which is harder - drawing a straight line between 2 pieces of an arrow with a marker, or filling in an oval with a ball point pen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Were both systems optical scan? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kick-ass-bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. yes they are.
I think some official reason was that the arrow was too confusing. :wtf: I have no idea how that could be confusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I guess a bubble is less likely to be considered a "stray mark". nt
Edited on Tue Nov-02-10 05:48 PM by LLStarks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Optical Scan is the ONLY way to go
Why every state does not use it boggles my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Agreed. But work must be done to make them more compatible with poor eyesight and shaky hands. nt
Edited on Tue Nov-02-10 05:47 PM by LLStarks
Hence why old folks might not like the new system as it is right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. they have accessibil;ty mahchines....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Ah. Okay. That's fine. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. +++++
Simple and verifiable and tested over time.

But the sellers of e-voting machines don't want those features.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. You know stuff like this is cool
its new technology, in a few years it will be a useful technology and will be reliable as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Trust needs to keep up with technology, but that hasn't happened with other electronic systems. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. "...in a few years..."
How many is a few?

These machines have been around for more than a decade now.

"...will be reliable as well."

Ah yes, will be reliable. Well, when? How?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. It seems overly complicated
I went with my son when he voted today in NYC. He checked in at one station, then went to another for his ballot, then to another to mark it,then to another to have it scanned. A couple of older folks seemed to be pretty confused. Fortunately that particular polling place had lots of workers.

Good news, though, there was a heavy turnout!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yup. Same procedure here on the island. Your ballot is with you from hand-off to scan completion.
Good stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. New York did the right thing
people will get used to it and wonder why they ever put up with those clunky machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Clunky doesn't even begin to describe those space-wasting Analytical Engines. nt
Babbage must be spinning in his grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yep, we do opti-scan in Michigan and I have no gripes with it.
nt


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. I am so glad that we(NY) have a verifible paper trail ballot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Exactly right. And a recount,. if necessary, actually MEANS something
With optical scan, the recount is of the paper ballots themselves. With the old voting machines and other e-voting systems it's just to make sure the machines performed "properly." Paper trail is the key to fair elections. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's kind of a pain now... voting a straight ticket is slow.
Also, a poll worker will see your ballot when they 'help' you get it scanned. It's not very private.

That being said, it seems okay to me as a user. No idea how secure it is, as far as vote-stealing behind the scenes. That's my main concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. A few things...
Edited on Tue Nov-02-10 07:49 PM by democrat2thecore
- Ballots are certified before being used - they can't be replaced. The ones delivered to the precinct are the ones returned - including blank, unused ballots.

- Most optical scan machines will take your ballot any which way you put it in. So the poll worker doesn't have to see anything....It's just a natural thing to try to insert it "up" - but it doesn't matter.

- The bubble makes a "mismark" almost impossible.

- No clunky room-sized machines.

I love these things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. long island bump nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC