Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First Bad Deal Gone Down: Origins of the Current Democratic Debacle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 06:34 PM
Original message
First Bad Deal Gone Down: Origins of the Current Democratic Debacle
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 06:36 PM by Karmadillo
It's too bad, because it didn't have to turn out this way.

http://chris-floyd.com/articles/1-latest-news/2042-first-bad-deal-gone-down-origins-of-the-current-democratic-debacle.html

The last, wan hope for real change in the American system was not lost through the imperial dithering of Barack Obama's "Bush-Clinton Terror War Continuity" administration during the past two years. No; those last wan hopes went down the drain in 2006 -- the year that the Democratic Party regained control of Congress ... and promptly made a screeching U-turn on virtually every anti-war, anti-imperialist, pro-liberty, pro-people position it had taken against George W. Bush.

The sell-out -- or rather, the pay-off to the corporatist-militarist power factions who actually control the Democrats -- was immediate, brazen and deeply destructive. It helped entrench the vast abuses of power of the Bush Regime (and its bipartisan predecessors), it guaranteed the deaths of thousands of innocent people in the continuation and expansion of the Terror Wars, and it laid the groundwork for Obama's "Third Bush Administration" of presidential death squads, pointless "surges" in bloody quagmires, remote control slaughter by drone, bristling defenses and relentless expansions of authoritarian power, and cringing, servile capitulation to Big Money on every possible front.

As Bruce Dixon points out in a timely and important piece at Black Agenda Report, the instant the Democrats regained Congressional power in 2006, they immediately jettisoned all talk of impeachment, all investigations of war crimes and the handling of Hurricane Katrina, all impetus for real health care reform, all their previously vociferous opposition to Bush's tax cuts for the rich, and a host of other "dissenting" positions that they had cynically trumpeted in order to manipulate the public's genuine anger and thirst for change. (Ironically, the Democrats are now being hoisted on their own petard, as the corporate-run "Tea Party" Republicans are about to oust them from Congress with their own cynical manipulations of genuine anger and thirst for change.)

Dixon nails it well:

Four years ago it was the eve of the November 2006 election, Bush's last midterm ... After 12 years of spectacularly corrupt and aggressively pro-corporate Republican domination, the House and likely the Senate too, would be ruled by Democrats. Expectations were high.

Four years ago a hundred members of the House of Representatives had signed on as co-sponsors of one or more bills to impeach Dick Cheney and George Bush. One of them was Detroit's John Conyers, dean of the Congressional Black Caucus, who would chair the House Judiciary Committee beginning in January 2007, and thus have the unquestioned legal power to begin hearings on the question of impeachment. Authoritative polls repeatedly showed that a a narrow majority of the American people, and an overwhelming majority of Democratic voters favored impeachment and criminal investigation of the Bush-Cheney regime on a broad front, from waging illegal wars to torture, lying to Congress, international kidnapping, secret imprisonment without trial and tapping the phone and email of millions of Americans. Rep. Conyers was also a perennial sponsor of reparations, antiwar and single payer health care measures, causes which could surely be advanced by his long awaited ascension to power.

Democrats had always massively opposed the Iraq war, and millions were perfectly aware that a Democratic majority in the House of Representatives could bring this unjust war to a halt over any presidential objection by simply refusing to fund it.


more...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep, RIP our whole way of life.
I guess not voting was the right thing to do.

just roll over and pee on myself a little.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. k&R - an article that contains some hard, sad truths. Taking impeachment off the table was,
to me, the first sign that we were reallly fucked. But, as this article shows, there were many other capitulations as well. What a waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. But, but
...I got nothing. It hurts, the truth often does.

KNR.

Oh wait, there is something, a rumor. It goes like this:

Dems took all that off the table so that bush wouldn't invade Iraq and bush would wind down the Iraqi invasion. That's it, that's all I got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. I didn't think of it that way, but Harry & Nancy's timidity and "moderation"
was pretty much of a white flag. Maybe that's why the prez was so accomodating to Boner - he knew the weak-kneed congress wouldn't go along with any real change. He still should have tried though, IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abq e streeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. A sad and regretful K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rec'd with sadness n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. A question about what Mr. Dixon states.
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 08:36 PM by Kaleva
"Authoritative polls repeatedly showed that a a narrow majority of the American people, and an overwhelming majority of Democratic voters favored impeachment and criminal investigation of the Bush-Cheney regime on a broad front, from waging illegal wars to torture, lying to Congress, international kidnapping, secret imprisonment without trial and tapping the phone and email of millions of Americans."

Looking at a couple of polls taken before the election in 2006, I found this:

"42. Democratic Congressman John Conyers has called for creation of a committee to look into impeaching Bush and removing him from office. Do you think Congress should or should not impeach Bush and remove him from office?"

----------- Should impeach----- Should not impeach---- No opinion
4/9/06---------33--------------------66------------------ 1

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_immigration_041006.htm

"Wisconsin Democratic Senator Russ Feingold has called for a Senate resolution to censure the president on
the authorization of warrantless surveillance with the U.S., but the public is ambiguous on this issue.
Americans are split on whether to censure the president, but they are clear that they don’t find the
president’s action on this issue to be an impeachable offense."

http://latimes.image2.trb.com/lanews/media/acrobat/2006-04/22915725.pdf

I'd be interested to learn what "Authoritative polls" Mr. Dixon is refering to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Here's one: New Zogby Poll Shows Majority of Americans Support Impeaching Bush for Wiretapping
http://www.democrats.com/bush-impeachment-poll-2

For Release: January 16, 2006

New Zogby Poll Shows Majority of Americans Support Impeaching Bush for Wiretapping

By a margin of 52% to 43%, Americans want Congress to consider impeaching President Bush if he wiretapped American citizens without a judge's approval, according to a new poll commissioned by AfterDowningStreet.org, a grassroots coalition that supports a Congressional investigation of President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003.

The poll was conducted by Zogby International, the highly-regarded non-partisan polling company. The poll interviewed 1,216 U.S. adults from January 9-12.

The poll found that 52% agreed with the statement:

"If President Bush wiretapped American citizens without the approval of a judge, do you agree or disagree that Congress should consider holding him accountable through impeachment."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. "to consider impeaching " is the key phrase.
That's quite different then what you said in the title of your post which I quote below:

"New Zogby Poll Shows Majority of Americans Support Impeaching Bush for Wiretapping"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. Election day kick.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. They didn't investigate war crimes or impeach because they were complicit.
They still continue to fund Obama's "necessary" war in Afghanistan and look the other way or blame WikiLeaks for the revelations about the mass murder in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. +1
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC