|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:02 PM Original message |
CNBC looking at cutting defense spending...first target is benefits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. After reducing the working class to paupers they now become the bench mark for anyone else who gets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. First target is always benefits on that station, haven't you noticed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Is it feasible to think we will ever get at contracting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
4. Support the Troops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countrydad58 (274 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. Well maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 05:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. They'd still find a way to blame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
droidamus2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
5. Oh yes, absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Your reply was eloquent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
droidamus2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 03:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxrandb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. Well, if they protect the salaries of the Flag Officers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 08:16 PM Original message |
Ah, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 08:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
30. Ah, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
6. Democrats would be fools to cut the people side of military spending. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwooldri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. +9999999% agree. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. If one Democrat votes to cut benefits to military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestTransplant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
9. I saw that too. As Wesley Clark says, Republicans love weapons, Democrats love troops. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
10. DON'T YOU FUCKING GET IT BY NOW!!!??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. +1000 eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. NAILED IT!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blindpig (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 03:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. I don't think that's the difference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
12. of course they are. cost-cutting ALWAYS = austerity for workers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:37 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Blah, blah, blah, blah...FUCKING BLAH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:47 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. what would you prefer i say? are you or yours in the military? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. It's not just the military relevant to this OP, it's EVERYTHING! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 03:14 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. my point is, "whining" on the internet about nobody doing anything is not different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 05:29 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Man, you ROCK! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
19. Fuck CNBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jp11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
21. When you do the same things big business has been doing for decades it isn't 'out of the box'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 05:29 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Yeah that is why I put it in quotes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
28. Obama had better not be stupid enough to even be considering cutting benefits at a time like this to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
29. How to cut defense spending- eliminate private contractors, cut overseas bases. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC