Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservative Pat Sajak: Should Public Employees Always Be Allowed To Vote?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-10 07:21 PM
Original message
Conservative Pat Sajak: Should Public Employees Always Be Allowed To Vote?
Edited on Wed Oct-13-10 07:23 PM by kpete
Have you read Wheel Of Fortune host Pat Sajak's blog post for National Review Online today? Because if you have, you might be saying: "I'd like to buy a W, T, and an F please, Pat."

That's because Sajak asks that question that's been on no one's mind: "Should state workers be able to vote in state elections on matters that would benefit them directly?"

In what appears to be his first post, Sajak pointed out today that no one in his family, or even his "kids' teachers or the guys who rotate my tires" is allowed to appear on his show, because there is at least the appearance of a conflict of interest. "In nearly all private and public endeavors," he continues, "there are occasions in which it's only fair and correct that a person or group be barred from participating because that party could directly and unevenly benefit from decisions made and policies adopted."

So, he asks, what about those state employees who have a greater stake in a vote's outcome than the rest of us?

Of course we all have a stake in one way or another in most elections, and many of us tend to vote in favor of our own interests. However, if, for example, a ballot initiative appears that might cap the benefits of a certain group of state workers, should those workers be able to vote on the matter? Plainly, their interests as direct recipients of the benefits are far greater than the interests of others whose taxes support such benefits.


more:
http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/pat-sajak-should-public-employees-always-be-allowed-to-vote.php?ref=fpblg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Va Lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-10 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. WTF?
Every election affects everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. What an asshat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-10 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. He can kiss the show goodbye
and take off the wig permanently. Fugg him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-10 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. So, Pat, taxpayers should not be allowed to vote on a ballot initiative that raises taxes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hello, dumbass. We ALL have a vested interest. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-10 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Heres a question for Mr.Sajak
Should Conservatives be allowed to breed? Its a legitimate question, how many times have they destroyed our economy or tried to drag us back to the dark ages?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mysuzuki2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-10 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. yes Mr. Sejak
public employees are the only group who vote in their own self interest, at least sometimes anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Should game show hosts be allowed to vote?
I can think of one who should be prevented from doing so because he is simply too stupid to make an intelligent choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Since rich people have so much free speech...
...and remember, folks, SCOTUS says that money is a form of free speech, should they be allowed to vote too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. Then it follows that no citizen be allowed to vote (D).
It just follows that only the wealthy and corporations should control our government, so we may as well just allow TPTB to appoint the representation they believe should be in control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC