Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats in Senate block recess appointments?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 10:39 AM
Original message
Democrats in Senate block recess appointments?
Senate blocks recess appointments with deal between Dems, GOP

Source: The Hill

Senate Democrats agreed Wednesday night to a Republican demand to block President Obama from making recess appointments while Congress is out of town campaigning for the midterm elections.

Democratic leaders have agreed to schedule pro-forma sessions of the Senate every week over the next six weeks, a move that will prevent Obama from making emergency appointments, according to Senate sources briefed on the talks.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/121775-senate-blocks-recess-appointments



WTFITS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. This had better be totally wrong or an outright lie.
Time to get on the phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Which Senate Democrats are going along with this?
and WHY?

:wtf:

If the Republicans won't do their jobs and allow his nominees to come up for an UP-OR-DOWN VOTE (remember how much the Republicans in Congress complained about this when Bush was (P)resident), then President Obama has little choice but to make recess appointments. Why would some Senate Democrats be going along with the Republicans on THIS? What else are they going to agree with? No "lame duck" session like Boehner wants?

I hope that this story is wrong. I really do.

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. I bet they would not have done that to LBJ...
..and expected anything for their state or districts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I would guess the WH was fine with it.
50+ nominees moved forward. After McConnell showed his cards, the alternative was all unconfirmed nominees being returned to the WH, and if Obama wanted to renominate them, they would need to start over, a whole new hearing ect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Afternoon de-kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC