Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House GOP Leadership Colluded With National Review To Blunt Criticism Of ‘Pledge To America’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 03:30 PM
Original message
House GOP Leadership Colluded With National Review To Blunt Criticism Of ‘Pledge To America’
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/09/25/house-gop-national-review-pledge/

The Daily Caller’s Jon Ward reports that there is “pretty widespread” discontent inside the GOP caucus with the recently-released “Pledge to America,” citing the document’s omission of an earmarks ban and its regurgitation of many health reform elements contained in the Affordable Care Act. But, Ward reports, the House GOP leadership was able to restrain much of the internal consternation among its members by circulating a positive editorial written by the National Review.

In the editorial titled “We’ll Take The Pledge,” the National Review editors lauded the document as being “bolder” than the Contract for America. The editorial also called the Pledge “compelling,” “praiseworthy,” and “a shrewd political document.”

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Republican sources told the Daily Caller that the GOP leadership colluded with the National Review in prearranging the editorial:

Two high-level Republican sources said that the National Review editorial had been prearranged, however, by Neil Bradley, a top leadership aide who is close to April Ponnuru, the executive director of the National Review Institute, and Kate O’Beirne, NRI’s president.

“It was a political blowjob,” one Republican aide said of the National Review editorial.


Bradley denied the accusation: “The assertion that I ‘prearranged’ the National Review editorial, or any editorial, is 100 percent false,” he said.

O’Beirne also denied the allegation, calling it “absolutely, categorically false.

In his weekly address, President Obama ripped the “Pledge to America.” “It is grounded in the same worn out philosophy: cut taxes for millionaires and billionaires; cut the rules for Wall Street and the special interests; and cut the middle class loose to fend for itself. That’s not a prescription for a better future. It’s an echo of a disastrous decade we can’t afford to relive,” he said.


http://dailycaller.com/2010/09/24/conservatives-denounce-gop-pledge-as-sellout-inside-job/print/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wounded Bear Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Surprise, surprise.....
RWers will fill in the blanks. When this is said, they will hear "Pledge to (take back) America. Carefully worded, isn't it? Typical dog whistle crap that the fundie sheep will fall for again.

I prefer Norman Goldman's take on it.....the "Pledge to "finish off" America." That's what it really is, and that's what I hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ya Noes when the GOPers say anything series...it somehow stinks for Blue Collars
We should not them Breed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank God the Republicans are not in disarray
See, it's always the Democrats who are fractious and in disarray. Republicans are united (UNITED, I tell you) behind their new Plague, and there's no dissension in the ranks anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Some things I never want associated in the same article
Kate O’Beirne and blowjobs.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. National Review? Who reads that rag anyway?
Other than dyed-in-the-wool conservatroids, nobody makes reference to that dreadful publication - unless it's to point & laugh, as we're doing here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC