|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
VMI Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:34 AM Original message |
Is a person that opposes interracial marriage necessarily a racist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
1. one would have to feel a need to seperate which would be do to a superiority/inferiority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
35. Sorry to burst your bubble, but that won't fly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geckosfeet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:42 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. GOD THINKS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:49 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. I told you.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geckosfeet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:51 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Hey, it's gods fault, not yours. Cool off. He can take it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 01:49 PM Response to Reply #45 |
55. it's all good... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geckosfeet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 09:01 PM Response to Reply #55 |
102. errrm, ok. I take your drift. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 01:24 PM Response to Reply #35 |
50. hey... i didnt say i believe it. i was hearing when i moved here interracial was a sin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 01:53 PM Response to Reply #50 |
56. I understand that...but hope you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. are you saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 06:55 PM Response to Reply #59 |
84. I don't know what southern Baptists preach or don't preach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ensho (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
2. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gormy Cuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
3. Such a person is necessarily bigoted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
96. Only a couple of posters understood what the OP was really about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gormy Cuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 10:47 PM Response to Reply #96 |
107. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
4. yes of course and no there is no legitimate opposition to interracial marriage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
5. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:39 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. how are they not? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:48 AM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Racial purity was tried once and it didn't work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texasgal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
6. That is undeniably racist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
8. Should women really be allowed to vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fuzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
9. There is no thing as "race" anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaStrega (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 03:16 PM Response to Reply #9 |
70. Exactly. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 09:34 AM Response to Reply #9 |
111. You saying that does not make it true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
10. one could realistically be concerned about added difficulties from society and bigots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:43 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. actually that is what the bible quote says and people take it as no interracial marriages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:39 PM Response to Reply #13 |
37. Would you PLEASE give us the exact "Bible quote"?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 01:27 PM Response to Reply #37 |
52. nope. dont know it. i read it about a decade ago when i got my answer where in the bible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
47. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 01:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
49. If a parent of mine showed such "caring concern" when I brought a black girlfriend... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dash87 (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 07:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
94. If you fear the bigots, the bigots win, no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 12:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
116. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
11. Too easy. Yes. Next question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
12. Yes, of course, by definition. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
14. Got it. When it comes to gay marriage, Dick Cheney and Laura Bush are freedom fighters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foxfeet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 01:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
51. Could you please clarify how this applies to the OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 04:51 PM Response to Reply #51 |
78. It should be obvious. Thanks for playing. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 12:19 PM Response to Reply #78 |
117. Oh, it's obvious, alright. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 06:51 PM Response to Reply #51 |
82. Some people are always angry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 06:53 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. And some people are homophobic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foxfeet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 08:54 PM Response to Reply #83 |
101. Yep, and some people are both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaoriMitsubishi (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
15. The holy union of marriage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
16. Is this a rhetorical question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 01:47 PM Response to Reply #16 |
54. I think the word 'holy' in it gave that one away! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
18. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
19. Yes, no, no, and no. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
20. It all depends on how dreeeeeeeeeeamy that person is. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VMI Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:29 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RZM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
21. Who knows? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
22. I've heard some people oppose it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
23. Depends how you define "oppose" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
24. Absolutely racist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
astral (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
25. The first thing I want to know is the reason for the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
26. You mean oppose Asian marrying an Italian, or a Jew marrying a Irish girl.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
miscsoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 09:38 AM Response to Reply #26 |
113. For obvious reasons I am pro neanderthals mating with humans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
27. Racist, IMO. BTW, marriage per se isn't "holy"; it's a civil union. That's why you need a LICENSE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
28. I would as a product of an interracial marriage consider such a person racist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
29. The problem is that the standard definition of "race" is wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gaedel (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 01:57 PM Response to Reply #29 |
120. They can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
31. Yes they are racist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
32. I have a problem with the word "opposes". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
33. I believe they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
34. I have to ask- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SargeUNN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
36. As one who lived with Jim Crow in Mississippi I say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geckosfeet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
38. What possible reason is there to oppose 'the intermingling'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
40. may not make you 'hateful' but does make you a racist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
41. "the intermingling of races" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
42. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
43. Any desire to prevent the "intermingling" of races is in itself racist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mefistofeles (214 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
46. Of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
48. Yes, they are a racist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
53. Nope, not possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustinL (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
57. yes, just as a person that opposes gay marriage is necessarily a homophobe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
58. A person could be against ALL marriage, and therefore, by definition, be against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
60. This question is asked about once a month like clockwork. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 09:36 AM Response to Reply #60 |
112. and it's obvious why many of you don't like that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 09:40 AM Response to Reply #112 |
114. I love the question being in an interracial marriage for five years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzteris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
61. yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
62. No, not necessarily. Not from any logical standpoint, anyway, given the data at hand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
63. Just thinking about it is racist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
64. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GSLevel9 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
65. please excuse the OT... why do you have a tiger pelt as your sig? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 03:06 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. My concern, as well. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 07:37 PM Response to Reply #65 |
92. Been a lot of tigers around here in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-26-10 10:25 PM Response to Reply #65 |
109. Perhaps he is expressing some sort of solidarity. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 09:26 AM Response to Reply #109 |
110. With who? Sarah Palin? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
66. Not necessarily. If a black woman worries that a successful black man will marry a white woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cemaphonic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 03:22 PM Response to Reply #66 |
71. That seems pretty unambiguouslyy racist to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 07:23 PM Response to Reply #71 |
89. The worry is that the successful man's money is leaving the community |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
67. No. Not possible. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
69. Yes, anything else is just a lie to cover the bigotry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
72. Sounds like a definition for racist to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
73. If the reason has to do with anything other than skin color then maybe, maybe not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
74. Yes.................you would be a racist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveOurDemocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
75. Absolutely, racist. What other possible reason could... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chaska (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
76. Yes, and that's just fine. It's human nature to be rascist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
77. Yes, the person who opposes interracial marriage is necessarily a racist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
79. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
80. Is a person that opposes interracial marriage necessarily a racist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
81. !. Yes, they are racist. 2. No. 3. No. 4. There's nothing "holy" about marriage, so no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
85. Anyone who opposes interracial marriage is a racist n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
86. Yes. No. No. No. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
87. Deleted message |
AspenRose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 07:26 PM Response to Reply #87 |
91. ^^^^ Best answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 08:47 PM Response to Reply #87 |
98. the word in the OP is "opposes" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
88. Yes. And I don't understand why ANYONE thinks who other people marry is any of their business. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoGOPZone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
90. If one opposes the intermingling of races through the holy union of marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dash87 (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
93. Yes, I believe they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
entanglement (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
95. YES! You are a bl**dy bigot even if you're nothing else, congratulations! Next. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iris27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
97. Yes, No, No, and No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
99. Yes, no, no, no nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
100. No - nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeffrey_X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
103. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indy legend (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
104. As a white male happily married to an African-American woman for the last 20 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 09:14 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. Kudos....Great post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
106. Um, I assume this is sarcasm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
108. Yes, of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
miscsoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
115. We can discuss the rights and wrongs of racism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evasporque (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
118. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
119. ummm... whut? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-27-10 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
121. Yes they are racist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:14 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC