Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If You Play Fair, They Should Pay Fair: Why the Women's Wage Gap Persists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 11:28 AM
Original message
If You Play Fair, They Should Pay Fair: Why the Women's Wage Gap Persists

http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2010/09/23/fair-womens-wage-persists


There’s a lot of talk this week about the Paycheck Fairness Act (PFA) and its chances for passage as Congress is set to adjourn, and head home for campaign season. The act is a necessary next-step piece of legislation when it comes to protection against gender-based wage disparities, by simply strengthening – and updating - the existing Equal Pay Act. Indeed, the bill notes that “in many cases the pay discrimination can only be due to continued intentional discrimination or the lingering effects of past discrimination.” Yet the misunderstandings and deliberate misinformation about the bill abound.

-snip-

It’s already passed the House of Representatives and is being shepherded, in the Senate, by Sens. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), integral in the passage of the Lily Ledbetter Act, and Chris Dodd (D-CT). President Obama has been clear – if the Senate passes the bill, he will sign it. This past week, Depart of Labor Secretary Hilda Solis led a webinar, with Lily Ledbetter, about the act. Vice President Biden, in a recent speech advocating for passage of the bill said that senators “should get on the right side of history.”

-snip-

Women now make up almost 50 percent of the labor force yet still make only 77 cents for every one-dollar a man makes. This sharply decreases for women of color. Two working parents or a working single parent lead 70 percent of families in the United States. Single female-headed households are only on the rise – yet account for the poorest sectors of our society. Despite the assumption made by some that a pay equity governmental policy is pointless because most women are “opting out” when they have a baby, have a male partner serving their every financial whim, or are simply working less hours at a similar job to their male counterparts, the facts do not bear this out.

-long snip-

So if this bill has the power to correct so many wrongs, why hasn’t it passed yet? Tejani told me, “Like so many important pieces of legislation, it’s been caught up in the partisan atmosphere. There’s a minority in Congress saying we won’t go ahead and vote.” This is despite the fact that some of the Republicans blocking a vote supported final passage of the bill’s companion, the Lily Ledbetter Act, with a similar premise.
-snip-
--------------------------------


oh, please let it pass in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Accepting the AAUW as a nonbiased source, the difference is 5%
If a woman and a man make the same choices, will they
receive the same pay? The answer is no. The evidence shows
that even when the “explanations” for the pay gap are
included in a regression, they cannot fully explain the pay
disparity. The regressions for earnings one year after college
indicate that when all variables are included, about onequarter
of the pay gap is attributable to gender. That is,
after controlling for all the factors known to affect earnings,
college-educated women earn about 5 percent less than
college-educated men earn. Thus, while discrimination
cannot be measured directly, it is reasonable to assume that
this pay gap is the product of gender discrimination.

http://www.aauw.org/learn/research/upload/behindPayGap.pdf

This compares to an 1100% disparity between the rates of workplace death for men vs women.

http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0008.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC