|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 10:48 PM Original message |
Log Cabin Republicans Outraged at Obama Administration Filing Objection to DADT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. Log Cabin Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pepperbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. this is definitely one time the "Where was your outrage when...?" card can be played! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 11:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Not really .... The Log Cabin repugs are repugs and they have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 09:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
24. Which is why they only sued for themselves, not all gay people. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DebJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
3. Sorry but this just cracks me up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. Those hypocritical pigs can go fuck themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. They are Republicans. They support the Senators who voted against repeal of DADT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LonePirate (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
7. Interesting. They are doing more to end DADT than Obama and they are being scorned for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 11:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Deleted message |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 11:21 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. +1000 +++ n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 11:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. It's really quite incredible. I would never have believed someone who predicted any of this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LonePirate (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 11:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Well said! It's as if the progressive goal is secondary to the person(s) trying to achieve it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 08:15 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. It certainly is when those persons are oh-so nobly working from narrow self-interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 09:54 AM Response to Reply #13 |
25. LCR only sued on behalf of themselves, not others. That is not a progressive goal. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 10:48 AM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Plantaganet (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 12:12 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Credit Where It's Due... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 09:46 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. The LCR only filed on behalf of itself---Obama seeks repeal for all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 08:21 PM Response to Reply #21 |
38. Seeks repeal for all......how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 08:17 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. I stand by what I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 08:18 AM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Its their intentions that are in doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 09:43 AM Response to Reply #7 |
19. Really? So how many Republican votes did they get for its repeal the other day? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 09:45 AM Response to Reply #7 |
20. They only sued on behalf of their own membership---Obama seeks repeal for all. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
37. Gay Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueCheese (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
11. They may be Republicans... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 09:47 AM Response to Reply #11 |
22. They only sued for themselves--how is that right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueCheese (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 04:30 PM Response to Reply #22 |
36. I'm not a lawyer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
12. Gay GOP group gives Cornyn award after 'no' vote to move on DADT repeal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 10:26 AM Response to Reply #12 |
28. How could anyone think the log cabin repubs were for anyone but themselves? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomCADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-24-10 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
14. HYPOCRISY! Did a single Republican support them on DADT vote in the Senate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 10:15 AM Response to Reply #14 |
27. kind of what I was thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomCADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 02:29 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. Of course, the Log Cabin Republicans Give Their Party A Free Pass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
23. Only non-lawyers are gonna fall for Dan Woods' cynical bullshit---- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
26. Did they happen to notice how the vote broke down in the Senate? Fuck 'em. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
29. Who DADT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snort (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
30. Umm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 10:58 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. It's poorly worded: the Obama Admin has filed to delay repeal of DADT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
32. I want to hear why and and How |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-25-10 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
35. Here is the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:09 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC