Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush just REFUSED to address whether he ordered Gonzales and Card to Ashcroft's bedside

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 10:52 AM
Original message
Bush just REFUSED to address whether he ordered Gonzales and Card to Ashcroft's bedside
In a press conference with Blair, he was asked by Kelly O'Donnell of NBC if he ordered them to Ashcroft's hospital room. He answered by talking about the enemy, and how NSA programs are necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 10:54 AM
Original message
You thought he'd tell the truth? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks Mom
Hope the bastard's starting to sweat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Jesus told him not to lie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Nah, his handlers just didn't give him the answer to that one
He is just the echo chamber. No voice of his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Look! Over there! Terrists!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. In 'polspeak', by not denying he confirmed it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinymontgomery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. The reporter
should have said just that "I take that as a yes" and see what the POS said then!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. I take that as a Yes....
If you asked me if I beat my wife and I said that my wife is a bad person deserving of punishment, I'd say you'd be probably right in assuming I meant Yes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Ding, ding, ding
We have a winner.

That was all the confirmation I need. Most likely, someone's going to testify in the Senate that he made that call. He has no way to squirm out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Comey did yesterday...see Post #13 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
45. He waffled
He said he had some recollection that it was Bush but he wasn't sure. I had to wonder whether that was honest doubt, he was trying to give Bush an out, or he was honestly afraid to say it was Bush.

In any case, he gave Bush some room to deny it. The fact that he had the opportunity to do so today and didn't confirms it pretty well, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. That was a "yesserie you bet I did" in my book.
IMPEACH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sheerjoy Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Exactly!!!!

Mission accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. he is so arrogant!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. Lord, I hope this gets some press
I keep watching ABC to see what they're putting out as "mainstream." How can they not cover this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. good for Kelly -- wow!
That took some chutzpah from her, to do her job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Actually Bush tried to butter her up before she asked her question
He was told that it's her birthday today (true, she confirmed it), so he offered to sing happy birthday to her with Blair, and there was loud laughter from his WH staff, of course. Good cheer was had by them all -- and then she still asked the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Oh how sweet. (SARCASM!!!) Did he have a nice, adorable, cutesy-pie nickname
for her, too?

I have one for him, but I doubt he'd appreciate it.

Actually, I have hundreds.

No, besides those, I have more than three thousand others. From Iraq. Which would lead me to nickname him "MURDERER."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. No nickname but he did talk to her in that "cutesy-pie" way he reserves
Edited on Thu May-17-07 11:36 AM by Bumblebee
for women reporters and occasionally men, like David Gregory. Winks and all. And he did appear to knock her off her stride some since she stumbled a bit while asking the question -- but she did it, and there was no laughter after that.

And she did come through with a follow up -- "so did you send them?" or something like that, but he ignored it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. Condescending little jerk was just trying too derail her. These journalists should be
on to his little game by now. :shrug: He shows such disdain for them, usually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. COMEY: I have some recollection that the call was from the president himself...
Edited on Thu May-17-07 11:13 AM by quiet.american
....COMEY: I have some recollection that the call was from the president himself, but I don’t know that for sure. It came from the White House.

I agree -- Bush's non-answer has now provided confirmation of Comey's excellent memory.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'll take that as a "yes".
He's not saying "no".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. if he was avoiding the answer the question I would also take that
as a YES response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
16. Is there any question now...
That one of the most important reasons that this domestic spying program(s) was/were in place was because they were going to spy on their Democratic opponents in the '04 elections?

Not here. I see it as one of the greatest reasons for their stonewalling, lying and obfuscation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. no question at all
they were spying in every state and on every candidate they saw as a threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. I smell another signing statment.....
That the President of the US can officially harass the Attorney General when he is in ICU... Yeppers, that should do it.... :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
18. He probably would not know one way or the other
This is why he had all the "adults" in his administration: Cheney, Rumsfeld and others - to really run things as they see fit while he watches TV, eats pretzles and go early to bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
22. IMPEACH!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am so sickened by this ongoing ____ ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. KNR. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
26. He should be asked that question every time he comes to the mic.
Same with Tony Snow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Yup! If Clinton Was Asked About Monica Every Time He Was At A Mic (And He Was)
then Bush should be hounded by this. I won't hold my breath for the "liberal media" to do it's job though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. So true. We should be shouting about the double standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldenOldie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. It is his modus-operandi for not confirming or denying
If he doesn't respond it never happened.

Did it with his TANG AWOL/Desertion. POOF! gone

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #32
49. Keep asking. Sooner or later the public will wonder why they are
asking this question over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
28. did she get a follow up??
Edited on Thu May-17-07 11:57 AM by GTRMAN
If she did, this would be the exact response to follow up with :evilgrin:

http://strmkr0.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/just_answer.mp3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. This, according to Bumblebee in post 25:
Edited on Thu May-17-07 12:31 PM by DeepModem Mom
And she did come through with a follow up -- "so did you send them?" or something like that, but he ignored it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. That's a yes then
I M P E A C H
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
33. This is where playing dumb has an advantage
Clinton could never get away with this non-answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
35. Any different response would be a shocker. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
37. It's beyond question - no matter how delusional - that Chimperor Disgustsus ordered it.
We're talking about two people who DIRECTLY reported to the Chimperor, without ANY other Constitutional role in government, in an administration that elevates personal LOYALTY to the BOSS above any other 'value,' who embarked upon a 'mission' not otherwise within the scope of their formal roles in government, taking extraordinary steps to coerce specious cover and concealment for the excesses of this regime. They had absolutely NO independent AUTHORITY to pressure an Attorney General themselves and could ONLY approach him on behalf of the Chimperor.

There's absolutely no possible interpretation that would absolve the Chimperor. None.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. yes, I noticed that
they were both part of his personal team. How DARE they interfere in the workings of the DoJ??!! How dare they impose an illegal spy program on the American people?

One is gone. The other is Attorney General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
38. so why didn't he answer the question? pick one
1. He didn't know the answer.

2. His handlers didn't know the answer.

3. He hoped the reporters would just go away.

4. He's hiding something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
39. the transcript is up...
PRESIDENT BUSH: That's right. Kelly O'Donnell.

Q Thank you, sir. There's been some very dramatic testimony before the Senate this week from one of your former top Justice Department officials, who describes a scene that some senators called "stunning," about a time when the wireless -- when the warrantless wiretap program was being reviewed. Sir, did you send your then Chief of Staff and White House Counsel to the bedside of John Ashcroft while he was ill to get him to approve that program? And do you believe that kind of conduct from White House officials is appropriate?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Kelly, there's a lot of speculation about what happened and what didn't happen; I'm not going to talk about it. It's a very sensitive program. I will tell you that, one, the program is necessary to protect the American people, and it's still necessary because there's still an enemy that wants to do us harm.

And therefore, I have an obligation to put in place programs that honor the civil liberties of the American people; a program that was, in this case, constantly reviewed and briefed to the United States Congress. And the program, as I say, is an essential part of protecting this country.

And so there will be all kinds of talk about it. As I say, I'm not going to move the issue forward by talking about something as highly sensitive -- highly classified subject. I will tell you, however, that the program is necessary.

Q Was it on your order, sir?

PRESIDENT BUSH: As I said, this program is a necessary program that was constantly reviewed and constantly briefed to the Congress. It's an important part of protecting the United States. And it's still an important part of our protection because there's still an enemy that would like to attack us. No matter how calm it may seem here in America, an enemy lurks. And they would like to strike. They

would like to do harm to the American people because they have an agenda. They want to impose an ideology; they want us to retreat from the world; they want to find safe haven. And these just aren't empty words, these are the words of al Qaeda themselves.

And so we will put in place programs to protect the American people that honor the civil liberties of our people, and programs that we constantly brief to Congress.


http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070517.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Doesn't sound like a "No" so it must be a yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Thank you, leftchick! And I see Think Progress has it. Now let's see if MSM...
picks it, and its significance, up.

Think Progress, via maddezmom: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x908296
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. LBN thread
if this does not make the M$M news shows tonight there is not any hope for journalism in this country


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2849582
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Thank goodness! AP is a good start -- AP means it'll be widespread. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #39
50. So they decided not to include the happy-birthday-bit
because it did not work and she was, after all, not worth it? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
41. Interesting. Define "enemy".
Would that be "political" enemy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
44. She should have asked the question this way....
"Is there any reason to believe that you did not send Gonzales and Card to the hospital bedside of Mr. Ashcroft?"

Puts the burden on him to come up with reasons not to believe that statement is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
triguy46 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
46. Not wavering in his tradition of "No straight answer for any question." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
51. DAY ONE - Bush refuses to answer
When will he answer to America?.

(what will we tell the chilllllldren?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
52. If there was any way Shrub could have denied it, he WOULD have....
as inconceivable as it is to think Gonzales and Card acted on their own authority, it's even MORE inconceivable that if they had, Shrub would have kept quiet about it. The great buck-passer and finger-pointer of all time, NOT take an opportunity to shift blame? Absolutely inconceivable. Of course he could have lied and said they took it upon themselves, but apparently that was too much of a whopper even for him. Or more likely, he already knows they won't take the fall for him, so the only out he has left is a non-denial denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC