Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK I need help with my rebuttal of this editorial-"Cutting Money"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:41 AM
Original message
OK I need help with my rebuttal of this editorial-"Cutting Money"
I need some resources,hard facts to go against this republican "economy bad,let's cut taxes"

http://www.thedailylight.com/articles/2010/08/29/opinion/doc4c79f005a904d571636304.txt

Wisdom or insanity?
Published: Sunday, August 29, 2010 12:48 AM CDT
Heath Sims
Ellis County commissioner

Wisdom is defined as the ability to discern or judge what is true, right or lasting. It is also the use of common sense, good judgment and a wise outlook, plan or course of action. Insanity is the act of doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. Wisdom is what built this country; the lack of or unwillingness to use wisdom is the insanity that will bring our failure.

The economy has hit home in our little Ellis County, and the commissioners court awaits the 2010-2011 budget to be proposed by the county judge. We have been told that the county has a $1.4 million deficit this year. What this means is that property values have decreased, new properties are not being added to the tax roles and fines and fees are down. This also means we need to make cuts to balance this budget. The question is do we use non-recurring revenue to pay for recurring expenses or do we cut recurring expenses.

Bureaucracy is the leading cause for inflated governments and employees make up more than 70 percent of the budget. I believe anything, except law enforcement and roads, should be on the table. That would include: reducing staff numbers, reducing benefits, furlough days and reducing non-profit organization funding or any other option that would have a positive effect on future budgets. If each employee in the county took four furlough days per year it would be a recurring expense savings of around $388,000. You will hear that services would have to be cut. In reality, this would mean that citizens would just need to be more patient, more responsible and accountable to themselves and their neighbors, especially in civil matters. Remember, the county government is not a city government, and the services that the county provides are generally state mandated. Most all services deal with health and safety.

An example of a recurring expense would be employee payroll or retirement. The county has more than 480 employees with an average salary of $41,570. The taxpayers of Ellis County are funding retirement benefits to employees at a $2.25 to $1 match. This is an average retirement payment to a retired employee of $885 per month. This does not include Social Security or retirement from a previous job. This means for every $1 that an employee pays into retirement, the county taxpayer puts in $2.25 (employees become vested after eight years of service and can fully retire after 20 years or when age and years of service add up to 75). This is a great retirement package but, in the current economy, should this number change? There is a proposed 25-cent reduction, is that enough? Basically, for every 25-cents that the county reduces its match, there is a recurring expense savings of $225,000 to the budget and taxpayer. Would it be wise for the county to consider cutting more than 25-cents? I will use the following as an example: If the county would reduce its retirement match to 1:1 it would cut a recurring expense by approximately $1.125 million and that would create a positive recurring budget reduction. This is a reduction that would affect all employees, including elected officials. A change at this time would not affect match money that an employee has already earned; it would only affect future matching dollars. I understand this is a very personal and emotional issue to the employees and so the question is: Should the taxpayer carry the burden, or is it the responsibility of the employee to carry the burden. This type of budget cut would decrease a recurring expense by using recurring revenue. This one is tough and an issue that is very stressful.

The commissioner’s court should also consider action to require all departments to impose an attrition policy to decrease their staff by at least one employee for the 2011-2012 budget. Through attrition, employee staffing numbers would decrease due to retirement or other factors that would cause a position to become vacant. It would also be understood that not all departments are equal and law enforcement is a service that in some occasions could be life or death.

Examples of deficit reduction using non-recurring revenue would be to use $400,000 from the road departments and or the $400,000 owed by the city of Waxahachie to Ellis County for the property where the new downtown parking garage was built as a balance to the budget deficit. This sounds good and easy, but it is a one-time non-recurring revenue and would not benefit future budgets. These options would be equivalent to borrowing money from a bank to pay off a credit card. The bill is still due, it is just a different creditor. The roads still need to be repaired but they will get worse before they get better.

The money owed by the city should be used to offset the cost of the buildings or used towards the construction of the planned juvenile justice office. We are mandated by the state of Texas, under Chapter 37 of the Texas Education Code, to institute a Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program that would require classrooms with administrators and teachers.

I know these are tough times and there are options being considered, but are the options being considered going to lessen the burden on the taxpayer and decrease the size of government? Are the options being considered using non-recurring revenue to pay for recurring expenses? I think all options should be on the table and only those options that will have a positive long-term effect for the taxpayers of this county today and tomorrow be considered.

There are many citizens of Ellis County that are unemployed and would love to have a county job. I bet they would be willing to take a job without retirement benefits. This is why we must be very wise in the decision we make concerning the 2010-2011 budget. The decision will be hard and will affect all individuals who are currently employed by the county, elected and non-elected and the taxpayers. A decision must not be made just to balance this budget but must consider the budgets of the future. The economy does show some signs of recovery, but we cannot afford to gamble away what we have today dreaming of what may come tomorrow. We must think very hard about using non-recurring revenue to pay for recurring expenses. The effective tax rate for 2010-2011 is .403599 cents, exactly one cent higher than the tax rate of .393599 adopted by the commissioner’s court earlier this week on Aug. 23. Do we ignore the need to make drastic cuts this year? Do we spend non-recurring revenue to get us by until next year? Do we do as some on the court may recommend for the 2011-2012 budget, raise taxes by two or more cents because we were unwilling to make cuts this year?

I believe it is our duty as elected Republicans and conservatives to make the tough decisions that would cut back on spending and decrease the size of the Ellis County government and work to lower taxes. We must all stop the entitlement system that has been created over time by politics. We must all demand of ourselves to be more responsible and accountable for our decisions and not automatically look for the government to assist. As elected officials we must demand the size of government be reduced and believe that less is more.

We as Americans must be respectful to our brothers and sisters, as well as accepting accountability to ourselves to ensure that this land remains free for our children and their children’s children. We must live as neighbors not strangers and respect the rights of our neighbors. What a grey world it would be if we were all the same; our differences are what makes this country strong, but it is the respect for a person’s freedom that makes us great.

A constituent made the following statement, “For everything there is a season … it is time to accept the cold, hard realities of a bad economy and stop putting off for some later party to contend with.” So, do we discern what is right and lasting? Do we plan and use a wise course of action? Do we continue to do the same thing over and over again? These questions will hopefully be answered at 10 a.m. on Sept. 16 for the public budget hearing on the second floor of the courthouse. I would ask you to please contact your commissioner or county judge or come to the budget hearing. If you are unwilling to be involved then you must be willing to accept the price. I would like to end by recommending that whether you are a Christian or not, the book of Proverbs is a book everyone should read.

God’s peace and wisdom be with you.

Heath Sims serves as Ellis County Commissioner for Precinct 3.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bherrera Donating Member (600 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would help you but the story is not complete
I am very good with maths, but I don't live in the USA, and I don't have the complete story. To be able to help you, I need to understand the location, and what is the total tax you pay. For example, is this tax the man discusses one imposed on property valuation? Does the political entity have also a value added tax or a sales tax? Any other income? What is the tax load in comparison to the overall size of the economy of this entity?

These factors are used to estimate how your area ranks. This is called in the business PEER RANKING. If you are within the boundaries of your peers, then there is a bit of space up or down with a particular tax. If you are above the peer group (for example, if you are in the top 20 % of entities regarding the tax take), then raising taxes can be very harmful. On the other hand, if you are BELOW the peer ranking, then raising taxes is an easy solution.

In general, one can say the TOTAL government tax collection from a modern economy should not exceed 40 % of the total society gross income. In your case, you should factor into the estimate the federal taxes. Also, if you have private water services, such costs should be included as a tax, because traditionally water provision was a government obligation.

I would also like to add, government spending does have a tendency to be inefficient. And taxing does have a tendency to create resentment - wasn't this the cause for the American revolution? Therefore if progressive forces in the USA wish to have success, they should focus less on higher taxes, and more on the proper distribution of the taxes they already collect. For example, American society spends a huge sum on military adventurism, and the total military budget is obscene. Another area where too much money is spent is on grandiose engineering projects such as the construction of huge dikes around New Orleans, that is incredible non sense. Another example is the aid USA gives to Israel. Israel is a nation with a per capita GDP equal to that of European Union nations. Why should the USA give aid to a rich nation? It doesn't make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billlll Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. 92% JFK top tax rate
Prosperous sixties

Bush cuts give us Great Recession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. When Heath Sims lays off an employee in his dept,
is he going to take on that person's duties himself, or dump it on another employee? I think we know the answer to that.

Is he proposing they change the goal in the retirement system in the middle of the game for employees? I guess he's fine with having 70 year old firefighters trying to carry his 200 pound grandma out of her burning home. Yeah, it's the employees' responsibility to watch out for their returement. They can start by voting out boneheaded elected officials like Sims.

Sorry, I'm not much help. His letter made me angry, though. Good luck with your letter w8t!! I'm typing on an iPhone. Sorry about mispellings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sims wants to take advantage of desperate unemployed folks.
Edited on Sun Aug-29-10 09:04 AM by Ilsa
I'm surprised he didn't suggest firing all current employees and rehiring at minimum wage, Zero benefits.

Instead, he should hold wealthy landowners hostage: they need to ante-up to pay for their emergency protection. They have more to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree-that's the impression I get,too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billlll Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. PS.....Clinton raised taxes, prosperous nineties
Gov workers spend, keeps factories + jobs going.

Some say Hoover taxcuts led to the 30's.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-29-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. good points!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC