Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here We Go Again: Obama’s War in Yemen

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:22 PM
Original message
Here We Go Again: Obama’s War in Yemen
Edited on Wed Aug-25-10 02:26 PM by G_j
http://firedoglake.com/2010/08/25/here-we-go-again-obamas-war-in-yemen/


Here We Go Again: Obama’s War in Yemen
By: Siun Wednesday August 25, 2010 1:30 am


As we’ve previously mentioned in December, January and this month, Yemen is one of the “roughly a dozen countries” besides Iraq and Afghanistan where Obama’s administration is waging war.

And as is the norm in these secret, undeclared wars, we are working hand in hand with unsavoury governments whose own agendas of repression are ignored under the guise of the “war on terror.”

Yesterday, in two reports, Amnesty International raised significant questions about the legality of US operations in Yemen:

http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/report/yemen-abandons-human-rights-name-countering-terrorism-2010-08-24

“The USA appears to have carried out or collaborated in unlawful killings in Yemen and has closely cooperated with Yemeni security forces in situations that have failed to give due regard for human rights,” Amnesty said in a report…

“The U.S. government has deployed drones in Yemen to kill those it describes as ‘high value targets’, a practice that has been increasingly criticized as involving unlawful killings,” Amnesty said, without mentioning specific incidents…

Amnesty said it had also obtained photographs apparently showing the remnants of missiles known to be held only by U.S. forces at the site of a December air strike against al Qaeda suspects that killed 41 people, half of them children.

Amnesty said that air strike, in southern Abyan province, was an example of security forces “killing unlawfully by using excessive force.”


And went on to cite both American and British involvement with Saudi airstrikes on Yemen civilians:


Its report said: “Foreign governments, especially the UK and US governments, have supplied jet fighter aircraft associated weaponry, upgrades and related technical assistance to Saudi Arabia.

“These governments will now be aware of the allegations that Saudi Arabian aircraft carried out indiscriminate attacks and other violations of international humanitarian law that resulted in deaths of Yemeni civilians.”

Amnesty said,
“months of attacks saw heavy aerial bombardments, including from Saudi Arabian forces” last year as the Yemeni authorities, under pressure to confront threats from al-Qaida and Huthi Shia rebels, targeted Sa’dah in the north of the country last year.

“Amnesty has gained information pointing to hundreds – possibly thousands – of civilians being killed in the bombing,” the charity said. (emph. added)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goldstein1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Democrats and Republicans agree:
The post-Cold War "Peace Dividend" just wasn't profitable enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Nobel Peace Prize is really tarnished for all time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ted_White Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. Its has been since Kissinger won it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. There are plenty of bad-news motherfuckers in Yemen, and they
need to be dealt with.

Don't kid yourself. The world is not a safe place, and Yemen is one of the least-safe places in that world.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think we should kill everyone.
Let's just get it over with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Not everyone. Especially, not the kids. Just the bad guys.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Good idea
kill them all and let God sort them out
We should build a bomb that only kills bad people and stays away from children and innocent people. Then we can ALL support the wars and get rid of terrorism.
:sarcasm: I am pretty sure yours was sarcasm too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. No, repeat NO children should ever be considered "collateral damage."
You want a terrorist act? Dropping 2,000-pound bombs on a crowded city (Baghdad) in the middle of the night is a fucking terrorist act, right there.

No. Just no. You let the bad guys go, if there's a chance you'll kill someone innocent trying to get them.

But that doesn't mean that the Bad Guys aren't out there. They are.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Confused are we?
No one is arguing there aren't bad guys in the world, but this program obviously kills children and innocents. If, as you state, that's unacceptable, then we all agree it's a failure and should be ended immediately. Yay consensus!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. OK, we have consensus. Time to try something else.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I'm with you Redstone :) (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seattleblue Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. Just curious. Was dropping those bombs on civilian
populations in WW II terrorist acts? In WW II the U.S., England, Germany and Russia all bombed exclusively civilian populations. Were they terrorist acts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Yes, I was certainly being sarcastic
There are bad guys everywhere. Seriously.

But we can't afford to be at war with the entire world and we shouldn't be anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. No, my GOD no, we can't "be at war with the entire world."
I've been in a war. That's nobody's idea of fun, unless they're seriously deranged.

But yes, as you said, there are bad guys everywhere. I'd vote to spend money to build them factories and give them jobs so they wouldn't, maybe, hate us so much.

That would be my preference. It would cost us a helluva lot less than we spent on weapons, yes?

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. and the tighter and more aggressive our grip the worse it gets
The Bush doctrine is just another failed "conservative" stance that will drain the treasury and make the nation less secure with new swaths of bitter enemies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Do some research on the CAP program in VietNam. A textbook example
of helping the Good Guys, while waxing the Bad Guys.

It worked.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. oh yea, "hearts and minds" worked so well in Nam
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Didn't do the research, did you?
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. they tried it in Fallujah, Iraq in 2004 also
that worked out well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. No, they did NOT try it in Fallujah. They just murdered everyone they saw.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. embedding
Edited on Wed Aug-25-10 03:02 PM by G_j
“embedding” U.S. troops in villages – to build relations with the local populace, train militias, gather intelligence, and deprive insurgents of vital supplies and geography – has its roots in the Combined Action Platoon (CAP)


on edit: though I really don't see the CAP/Yemen policy connection
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Last time: They didn't do that in Fallujah.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. admittedly it was a lie
http://www.counterpunch.org/chmiel01132005.html

<snip>

By contrast, United States military officials were offering this more upbeat assessment in the aftermath of the siege:

"We are attacking reconstruction efforts with the same grit, sweat and determination used to eliminate the malicious threat posed by the terrorists and insurgents," said Lt. Col. Dan Wilson, deputy operations officer of the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force in Fallujah. "We want to help the residents, so they will be able to live in peace and enjoy the privilege of voting in the upcoming elections."

Military officials expressed sympathy with the plight of returning residents but said the blame should rest with militants who took control of the city and continued to hide among the population.

"Our forces never intentionally damage structures or homes," said Wilson, the deputy operations officer. "After all, we, in partnership with the interim Iraqi government, will be at the forefront of assisting in the restoration and cleanup of Falluja."

Michael Ware, Baghdad bureau chief for Time magazine, who has been in Fallujah during the fighting said "the name of the game is deny the population to the insurgents. That's what we're trying to do, win hearts and minds. But we're not winning them."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Lying scumbag sons-of-bitches, as usual. "We had to destroy
the village to save it."

Oh, and not to mention, "If you grab them by the balls, their hearts and minds will surely follow."

Your point well-taken, OK? I have enough bitterness to last a lifetime, given the above.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. yes
the paragraphs proceeding described the terrible devastation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. You know, I'm a bit surprised that "Fallujah!" is not a war-cry in Iraq.
What we did to that country is an utter disgrace.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. truly, and then there was the use of chemical weapons
I'm sure Fallujah will not soon be forgotten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. What bad guys? Poor jungle dwellers caught up in bogus domino theory on both sides
to perpetrate eternal war?

Nam was a failure except for those wishing to entrench power and/or sell munitions and armament.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. "Jungle dwellers" is a pretty damn demeaning term.
And neither North nor South VietNam is largely jungle.

And, yes, there are indeed genuine Bad Guys out there. The NVA, for one. The Taliban, for another. If you have any daughters, would you like them to have their noses cut off because the Taliban doesn't like the fact that they go to school?

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. We have plenty of "friends" with similar behaviors. Our allies play ball our enemies don't that is
the only meaningful distinction. We get "moral" if folks wish to run out multi-nationals or don't want to trade their resources in an acceptable manner, otherwise the mutilations, stonings, political prisoners, and beheadings aren't an issue.

Remember when Saddam was gassing Kurds? We sent Charles Schultz over and he gave the seal of approval and the whole situation was pretty much an overstated misunderstanding but as soon as he made waves that might affect the flow of oil it was an issue. When he started the talk of trading his oil for euros, it was a wrap.

Do we need to get into the South American puppets?

There is no level of depravity that money, strategic position, resources to plunder for multinationals, and/or free trade won't overcome...NONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Automated Assassination and Mechanized Megawar
Mass Assassinations Lie at the Heart of America's Military Strategy in the Muslim World

Oh. Siegelman's not in the clear, Scrushy's still in prison and George Walker Bush and Richard Bruce Cheney remain free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fuck us! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Didn't Egypt get its ass kicked in Yemen?
Don't the Egyptians consider Yemen their "Viet Nam"?

Mubarak should give the white house a ring and explain things in small words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Everyone gets their ass kicked in Yemen. It's just like Afghanistan;
they get together long enough to kick out whatever group of foreigners is there, then go back to merrily killing each other after they've thrown the foreigners out.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC