Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WikiRape? How convenient.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 09:32 AM
Original message
WikiRape? How convenient.


WikiLeaks founder accused of rape, molestation in Sweden
By the CNN Wire Staff
August 21, 2010 9:55 a.m. EDT

Stockholm, Sweden (CNN) -- The founder and editor of the whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, is wanted in Sweden after accusations of rape and molestation, a spokeswoman for the Swedish prosecutor's office told CNN Saturday.

Spokeswoman Karin Rosander said Assange was arrested in absentia Friday night, and faces charges in relation to two separate instances, but she didn't have more detail about when the alleged crimes occurred or who the alleged victims are.

Assange denied the allegations in a posting Saturday on the WikiLeaks Twitter page, saying, "The charges are without basis and their issue at this moment is deeply disturbing."

A rape charge carries a possible prison sentence, while a molestation charge would not, Rosander said. In Sweden, a crime of molestation is not limited to child victims.

>snip<
More at this link:

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/08/21/sweden.wikileaks.charge/index.html




How much are you believing this?

I am caused to think immediately of Scott Ritter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Standard spin, Targeted justice
However, we also have heard about other people raping.

Contractors during interrogations. Which is real?

So what is the point of the post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. "So what is the point of the post?"
Well, since you asked, clearly nothing. No point whatsoever. So sorry to have caused you to click in to a provocative thread title and then disappoint you. Can you ever forgive me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. No problem, by me replying to a pointless post.
Edited on Sun Aug-22-10 06:50 PM by RandomThoughts
My post is possibly pointless, since it is in part based on your post.

So us doing the same, how could I hold it against you.

However asking what the point is, is not saying it is pointless, so maybe that is it also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Deny the enemy his terrain. He can not stay
in a country with laws that will allow him to publish documents he received as part of a crime. If he fails to show on the warrant he will be an interpol fugitive.

He has been playing a chess game and should not be surprised when the other side moves pieces as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Since the charges were cancelled, sounds like Sweden
didn't appreciate another country playing that game on their sovereign territory.

But interesting that by posting "Deny the enemy his terrain" you are pointing out that the whole thing was trumped up from the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. When first saw this story..
I thought the same thing...what a coincidence that these charges would surface now, and how convenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. hmmmmm wonder which government might be instigating this? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Stinky, please stop reading my mind. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. several DUers who were licking their chops over this story
are going to be sooooo disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Those DUers are willing lapdogs.
Fuck 'em and the status quo they rode in on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. Michael Corleone wants to "get something" on this uncooperative Nevada senator,
so he has the guy drugged, only to have him wake up in a hotel room with a dead hooker. Tom Hagen assures the senator that Michael will cover up the incident. Suffice to say, the senator becomes cooperative. The Corleone family takes over gambling in Nevada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Those were (fictional) interesting times that refected (real) interesting times that continue today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Classic silencing tactic, framing someone with either "a dead hooker or a live boy"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pschoeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. The warrant has already been rescinded
Sweden has cancelled an arrest warrant for Wikileaks founder Julian Assange on accusations of rape and molestation.

The Swedish Prosecution Authority website said the chief prosecutor had come to the decision that Mr Assange was not suspected of rape but did not give any further explanation.

The warrant was issued late on Friday.



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11049316
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. charges dropped.....now isn't that special....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. When I saw it earlier this morning
I said "Some more manufactured bullshit"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. I just saw a breaking announcement from MSNBC a few moments ago...
Seems the arrest warrant has been withdrawn. And Reuters is now reporting the same:

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLDE67K08R20100821

Aug 21 (Reuters) - Sweden has withdrawn an arrest warrant for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who had been wanted on suspicion of rape and molestation, the National Prosecutor's Office said on Saturday.

It said in a statement on its website that Chief Prosecutor Eva Finne had determined there were not enough grounds for the warrant.

A spokeswoman for the prosecutor's office said Assange, whose whistle-blowing website last month published secret U.S. military files on Afghanistan, was no longer wanted by Swedish authorities.

...snip...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. Already tossed by the Swedes.
This was straight up bullciat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. This is a setup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. I call total bullshit...
Edited on Sat Aug-21-10 11:32 AM by CoffeeCat
...and I also agree with you about Scott Ritter.

Look at what happened to anyone who threatened their previous Iraq war. Scott Ritter. David Kelly. Valerie Plame.

Seriously though. How many times can they pull this out of their bag of tricks? They'll look like idiots if
every time someone who threatens to expose them--is accused of child molestation.

This is so obvious...it's silly and stupid.

And as someone who does volunteer work with adults who were sexually abused as children--I don't call "bullshit" lightly when
it comes to child molestation and rape. But this...is outrageously obvious.

The people who fancy themselves as evil overlords are getting sloppy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. The Swedish prosecutor has done the same call of bullshit
At least on the rape beef. The molestation beef is as yet unresolved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. The funny thing is, there's no age limit on molestation in Sweden!
So he can be accused of "molesting" an adult! WTF?!

At least there's no prison time on-the-line for that charge in Sweden, but still... enough to sully his reputation, even if the charge doesn't stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
22. If you recall, the Scott Ritter case turned out to be true
Edited on Sat Aug-21-10 08:29 PM by SoCalDem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-21-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. That's exactly what they WANT you to think!
I'm not so sure about the Ritter case either. I don't trust cops that do those online stings. Too easy to fabricate chat logs and make it seem worse than it really is. Could have very well been a case with the cop sending Ritter pictures of an adult woman, and then getting him in a compromising situation by masturbating on webcam, then doctoring the logs to make it sound like he was chatting with a supposed underage girl.

I really hope Assange is smarter than that, and doesn't allow himself to get drawn into any potentially compromising situations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I thought the trial was pending. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. Is there any evidence that Americans might have fueled this?
A CIA plot, perhaps? Or does anyone suspect someone in the Obama administration? Or are Americans' hands clean in this matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I'm unaware of any such evidence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC