Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gates Foundation money behind LA Times hit-piece & "effectiveness ratings" of individual teachers?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 09:28 PM
Original message
Gates Foundation money behind LA Times hit-piece & "effectiveness ratings" of individual teachers?
Edited on Mon Aug-16-10 09:57 PM by Hannah Bell
On Sunday the LA Times published a story which, once again, lays all the ills of US schools at the feet of teachers. In the months to follow, the Times will publish "effectiveness ratings" of individual teachers in the LA system; ratings the Times itself commissioned:

"Seeking to shed light on the problem, The Times obtained seven years of math and English test scores from the Los Angeles Unified School District and used the information to estimate the effectiveness of L.A. teachers — something the district could do but has not... In coming months, The Times will publish a series of articles and a database analyzing individual teachers' effectiveness in the nation's second-largest school district — the first time, experts say, such information has been made public anywhere in the country."

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-teachers-value-20100815,0,2695044.story


"The Times hired Richard Buddin, a senior economist and education researcher at Rand Corp., to conduct a "value-added" analysis of the data... The Times obtained scores for the academic years 2002-03 through 2008-09 from LAUSD under the California Public Records Act. Included were 1.5 million scores from 603,500 students. Students' names were not included, but their teachers' names were.

Buddin calculated value-added scores for more than 6,000 elementary school teachers in terms of standard deviations from the average. For a technical explanation of his analysis, go to http://www.latimes.com/teachermethod.

Buddin worked for The Times as an independent contractor; Rand was not involved in his analysis.

A $14,000 GRANT FROM THE HECHINGER REPORT, an independent nonprofit education news organization at Teachers College, Columbia University, HELPED FUND THE WORK. The institute did not participate in the analysis.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-teachers-value-about-20100815,0,3603373.story


A few key points:

1. The Hechlinger Report has been in existence only one year; the Gates Foundation was one of its start-up funders & continues funding to this day:

NEW YORK, NY – An independently funded arm of Teachers College at Columbia University today announced the creation of an innovative newsgathering effort called The Hechinger Report to provide in-depth coverage of national education issues on its own and in collaboration with other news organizations...The Institute’s entry into the expanding field of non-profit, non-partisan journalism is supported by $1 million in initial funding from Lumina Foundation for Education and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/10/hechinger-announces-new-nonprofit-to-cover-education/


2. Lumina Foundation, Hechlinger's other funder, is also a recent creation (2000) & associated with finance & ed deformers:

Lumina Foundation was created in the summer of 2000 when USA Group— at the time the largest private guarantor of student loans in the country—sold its assets to Sallie Mae. The proceeds of the sale, $400 million in cash and $370 million in Sallie Mae stock, formed the basis of the new foundation...

(Initiatives include) Making Opportunity Affordable, which is also funded by the Wal-Mart Foundation...

(The CEO) has forged informal partnerships with organizations that have similar objectives, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation...

http://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/article.asp?article=1579&paper=1&cat=141


3. RAND Corporation is a think-tank of the military-industrial complex which branched into school deform propaganda within the last 10-20 years:

RAND Corporation (Research ANd Development<2>) is a nonprofit global policy think tank first formed to offer research and analysis to the United States armed forces by Douglas Aircraft Company. It is currently financed by the U.S. government, a private endowment,<3> corporations <4> including the healthcare industry, universities<5> and private individuals.

Governance

The organization's governance structure includes a board of trustees. Current members of the board include: Paul G. Kaminski (Chairman), Karen Elliott House (Vice Chairman), Richard J. Danzig, Francis Fukuyama, Richard Gephardt, John W. Handy, Jen-Hsun Huang, John M. Keane, Lydia H. Kennard, Philip Lader, Peter Lowy, Michael Lynton, Charles N. Martin, Jr., Ronald Olson, Paul O'Neill, Michael Powell, Donald B. Rice, James E. Rohr, James F. Rothenberg, Hector Ruiz, Carlos Slim Helu, Donald Tang, James Thomson, and Robert C. Wright.

Trustees Emeriti include: Harold Brown, Frank C. Carlucci

Former members of the board include: Walter Mondale, Condoleezza Rice, Newton Minow, Brent Scowcroft, Amy Pascal, John Reed, Charles Townes, Caryl Haskins, Walter B. Wriston, Frank Stanton, Carl Bildt, Donald Rumsfeld, Harold Brown, Robert Curvin, Pedro Greer, Arthur Levitt, Lloyd Morrisett, Lovida Coleman, Ratan Tata, Marta Tienda, Jerry Speyer, Timothy Geithner, Rita Hauser, Ann Korologos, and Bonnie McElveen-Hunter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAND_Corporation


Isn't it funny how whenever you look at ed deform stuff, 9 times out of 10 you'll find GATES, BROAD OR WALTON MONEY in the picture?

Don't you love living in a plutocracy? Don't you love being manipulated by the rich?

They invent your thoughts for you.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. kik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bunch of worthless troublemaking self serving fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Still just blown away by this bullshit
Thanks for putting it all together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. The article indicates
one of the "successful" teachers was teaching to the test.

On this day, Aguilar had invited a student to the board to divide two fractions — a topic on the upcoming state exam.


I can see how his kids jumped 27 percentiles on the state exam.

I didn't see anything in the statistical model presented that accounted for teaching to the test. In fact it appears the architects of the model never considered the possibility that teachers were teaching to the test and that that could explain the difference in test scores. And yet, their model and the conclusions they reached completely fall apart if teaching to the test was occurring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. some other reasons value-added = bogus in the video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. kik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. In the face of gov. budget cuts and school budget cuts, there was a story on the SF peninsula...
a newspaper (out of Palo Alto, which meticulously avoids putting anything online) did a public information request and published the top 100 educator salaries in the county.

The story included no context of how advanced of degrees the professors might have had, how many years experience, how many cross degrees or how many training what-have-yous they might've been part of... it simply listed them by salary. As if they were all straight out of college and equally qualified... and without even the context to explain what sort of results their students might be showing in any testing that might be going on.

It was very effective for showing raw salaries.

It didn't show in any way, shape, or form... how those raw salaries compared with local used car salesmen.

It also showed no relational information to compare the proficiency of those teachers with any other teachers, in the Bay Area, or the country... or the world, for that matter.

Unfortunately... many in the "audience" refuse to consider the idea of "context"... somehow assuming theirs is the only relevant context in the universe.

Ahh well... my point is likely to be too specific to be of interest or consideration...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. I missed this one.
Nice work. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. a lot of people are studiously avoiding it. it would spoil their storyline to acknowledge
Edited on Wed Aug-18-10 02:46 PM by Hannah Bell
that the "accountability" movement is actually just the continuing movement of plutocrats to destroy unionism & workers' protections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Can't have that.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. no, it wouldn't do to acknowledge that we're ruled by a handful of people with money,
that they feed us our "ideas," that they restructure our lives (to our detriment) whenever the hell they feel like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Operating as if tptb have the only ideas and
the only solutions is arrogance and dishonesty in action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC