Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Air Force seeks new nuclear command-and-control terminals

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 07:25 PM
Original message
Air Force seeks new nuclear command-and-control terminals
Air Force seeks new nuclear command-and-control terminals

By Bob Brewin 08/16/2010

After more than a decade of delays, the Air Force launched an advanced satellite on Aug. 14 to provide jam-proof communications for nuclear forces, but the service is rethinking its strategy to develop terminals for bombers and ground stations to avoid further extensions.

The Air Force plans to acquire six Advanced Extremely High-Frequency satellites for a project that has stretched over more than a decade, starting in 1999 at a cost of $3.2 billion to develop and put in orbit the first satellite. The Air Force estimates it will spend another $4 billion for five more satellites.

The AEHF satellites, developed by Lockheed Martin Corp., operate at data rates ranging from a little faster than a 1990s dial-up modem (75 bits per second) to about the same as a home cable modem or telephone high-speed Internet connection (8 megabits per second).

Gary Payton, deputy undersecretary of the Air Force for space programs, told the House Armed Services Committee in April that the AEHF satellites will increase the throughput for the jam-proof communications needed for overseeing nuclear forces from kilobytes per second to a megabyte per second.

http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20100816_8329.php?oref=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Any word on the Mineshaft Question?
We must not allow a Mineshaft Gap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC