Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dawkins says the sight of a burka causes 'visceral revulsion' but he wouldn't want to ban them

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 12:56 AM
Original message
Dawkins says the sight of a burka causes 'visceral revulsion' but he wouldn't want to ban them
Edited on Wed Aug-11-10 12:57 AM by BurtWorm
I know what he means on both counts.

PS: Of course his remarks were deemed offensive.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1301750/Fury-Richard-Dawkinss-burka-jibe-atheist-tells-visceral-revulsion-Muslim-dress.html?ito=feeds-newsxml




Fury over Richard Dawkins's burka jibe as atheist tells of his 'visceral revulsion' at Muslim dress - Mail Online - Mail Online


The outspoken atheist Professor Richard Dawkins has re-ignited the furore over the burka, describing it as a ‘full bin-liner thing’.

The 69-year-old author and scientist told of his ‘visceral revulsion’ when he sees women wearing the controversial Islamic clothing.

But he stopped short of calling for the UK to follow the French in banning them, insisting such legislation would not be in Britain’s liberal tradition.
His comments prompted fury among Muslim groups who accused him of being ‘ignorant’ and ‘Islamophobic’.

Professor Dawkins made the comments in an interview with Radio Times discussing his forthcoming documentary about the dangers of faith schools.

Last night he stood by his remarks and told the Daily Mail: ‘I do feel visceral revulsion at the burka because for me it is a symbol of the oppression of women.’

But he admitted he was reluctant to advocate banning any item of clothing.

He said: ‘As a liberal I would hesitate to propose a blanket ban on any style of dress because of the implications for individual liberty and freedom of choice.’

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. He managed to piss BOTH the Islamic fundies AND the anti-Islam zealots in one fell swoop.
I love this guy. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's our boy.......
And I have to admit that I agree with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. "it is a symbol of the oppression of women" indeed.
"the implications for individual liberty and freedom of choice", for me, do not cover hurting other people though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. I used to see women in burqas all the time in Jersey City.
At the time, the governor of New Jersey was Christie Todd Whitman.

I kept wanting to yell, "You're in New Jersey! The governor is a woman! You don't need to wear that here!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. visceral revulsion
Hits the nail on the head.

And I agree with Dawkins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. That's my reaction in a nutshell. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. whoop whoop
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. "Visceral revulsion" -- yes. The first time I saw a man leading around a woman
Edited on Wed Aug-11-10 02:21 AM by pnwmom
in one of these -- at my local Sears -- it was like seeing a man leading a woman on a leash. Revolting.

I'll never get used to the sight, though it isn't as shocking to me here anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sea Witch Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I agree
It isn't so much the piece of cloth, but what that cloth represents. Women who wear them never come from cultures/communities that allow them a choice in it. Even here in the US, the choice is not really a choice when coerced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Welcome to DU, Sea Witch! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sea Witch Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thank you, just getting my land legs!
I have a passion for global women's rights, GBLT equality, ending wars, eleviating poverty and fixing how we relate to our environment. Hoping I fit in here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. self-important pukes like dawkins cause me visceral revulsion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. But you just love the sight of a woman in a burka, right?
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. When your opinion is considered worthy of being published in the international press,
you will be in a position to call others "self-important".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. "worthy" -- by who? by other self-important ruling class twits.
just because the ruling class thinks someone's "worthy" (= supports ruling class positions & biases) of being published in the media venues *they* own doesn't mean anyone should pay attention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. Dawkins, once again, is right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. Can't say I disagree on both counts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. I agree with both sentiments
I find burkas disgusting but laws governing what relgious clothing can and cannot be worn go against my idea of liberty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. Up to a point...
The point being that you cannot go into certain places with your face covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
15. i agree with his view. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
20. correct on both counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. This Xtian agrees with Dawkins on both counts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC