Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anybody hear of HR 5471Mandatory Service for 2 years?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 07:12 PM
Original message
Anybody hear of HR 5471Mandatory Service for 2 years?
I'm reading about it on blogs and wondering if it is just smoke?
It sounds like a draft to me and the age troubles me 18-42
if it just BS Good I feel better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you mean this bill?
HR 5471: To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to extend for 6 months the increase provided under that Act in the Medicaid Federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP).

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d111:1:./temp/~bdqkcI:@@@L&summ2=m&|/home/LegislativeData.php|
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. it looks like the Blog is bogus thanks for looking into it
I was just curious about it thats the number but its not Mandatory Service
Whew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Just out of curiosity, what blog?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, they'll need a lot of guards for the FEMA detention camps.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yeah but keep that quiet so the Teabaggers don't find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jumping John Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. The correct bill is HR 5741 and it is real - Rangel has always wanted a draft for the
Chicken Hawks as he sees them and he thinks t will cause the war to end sooner if there are no deferments offered for anyone. This bill still would not require Bush to serve but yea his daughters would.

There is no co-sponsors and it is currently in the armed forces committee.

YUP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. These sorts of things come up every year or so...
Nothing ever happens. It's just a political ploy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
one_voice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's some info...
H.R. 5741

To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, and for other purposes.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-5741

For context, Congressman Rangel has introduced this bill many times in the past. Each time, it has received very little support, and Rangel knows it has no chance of being passed.

Congressman Rangel Reintroduces Bill To Reinstate Military Draft
July 15, 2010 2:58 PM

WASHINGTON - Congressman Charles Rangel on Thursday introduced H.R. 5741, a bill that would reinstate a compulsory military draft, or alternative national service, during times of war, for men and women, aged 18 to 42, who are citizens or permanent residents of the United States.

"What troubles me most about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is the total indifference to the suffering and loss of life among our brave young soldiers on the battlefield," Congressman Rangel said. "The reason is that so few families have a stake in the war which is being fought by other people's children.

"The test for Congress, particularly for those members who support the war, is to require all who enjoy the benefits of our democracy to contribute to the defense of the country. All of America's children should share the risk of being placed in harm's way.

"In other words, if you support the war, you should support a compulsory military draft," Congressman Rangel said.

The bill, which the Congressman first introduced in 2003 as the nation prepared for the invasion of Iraq, and offered again in 2004, 2006, and 2007, provides for:

• A national service obligation--either military or civilian--for every citizen and permanent resident, male and female, of the U.S., aged 18 to 42.

• Persons may inducted to perform military service only if a declaration of war is in effect, or if the President declares a national emergency necessitating the induction of persons to perform military service and immediately informs Congress of the reasons for the declaration.

• Defines "national service" as either military or civilian service as defined by the President that promotes national or homeland security.

• Give the President the authority to establish the numbers of persons to be selected for military service and the means of selection.

• Requires those not selected for military service to perform their national service obligation in a civilian capacity for a period of two years.

• Directs the President to prescribe the regulations necessary to carry out the act.

• Deferments for education are only permitted through completion of high school, to a maximum age of 20.

• Deferments may be made for physical or mental disability, or under claims of conscientious objector.

BRINGING THE TROOPS HOME

Rangel said that he was not challenging President Obama's handling of the war in Iraq or Afghanistan, conflicts with few options that the President had inherited from the previous Administration.

"I support the President's intentions to withdraw our troops, but I'd like to see it happen sooner. In my view, no additional tax dollars should be appropriated for any reason except to bring home our brave and exhausted young men and women. The loss of 5,500 lives and 38,000 wounded is enough

*snip*

http://rangel.house.gov/2010/07/rangeldraft0716.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC