Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Case for $320,000 Kindergarten Teachers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 07:46 AM
Original message
The Case for $320,000 Kindergarten Teachers
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/28/business/economy/28leonhardt.html?src=busln


Economists have generally thought that the answer was not much. Great teachers and early childhood programs can have a big short-term effect. But the impact tends to fade. By junior high and high school, children who had excellent early schooling do little better on tests than similar children who did not — which raises the demoralizing question of how much of a difference schools and teachers can make.

There has always been one major caveat, however, to the research on the fade-out effect. It was based mainly on test scores, not on a broader set of measures, like a child’s health or eventual earnings. As Raj Chetty, a Harvard economist, says: “We don’t really care about test scores. We care about adult outcomes.”

...........................

Just as in other studies, the Tennessee experiment found that some teachers were able to help students learn vastly more than other teachers. And just as in other studies, the effect largely disappeared by junior high, based on test scores. Yet when Mr. Chetty and his colleagues took another look at the students in adulthood, they discovered that the legacy of kindergarten had re-emerged.

Students who had learned much more in kindergarten were more likely to go to college than students with otherwise similar backgrounds. Students who learned more were also less likely to become single parents. As adults, they were more likely to be saving for retirement. Perhaps most striking, they were earning more.


So, that book was right!! All I really need to know I learned in kindergarten...................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. All they looked at were test scores
it's like human beings just aren't that complex? That is all they seem to know how to do, and of course profitable for them to test and test and test.

A doctor gets a sick patient and it good with them so more sick patients go to him because they have heard he can help them. He listens to them carefully. He's a good doctor unless they see how sick all his patients are and he gets punished for it. It's the same way with teachers, some get the difficult kids and they are good with them. Maybe they don't all go to college but end up as fine people. They get punished because their kids have 'lesser' outcomes. There is a need to look at the bigger picture not just test scores. It's an art not a science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. you did not READ this!!
The test score difference was nil by high school. But kids who had certain teachers in kindergarten went to college more consistently, had higher earnings, and fewer babies out of wedlock. The whole point of this is that they looked BEYOND test scores, and found lots of differences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. THEY looked beyond the test scores
that is not what is being done now. Get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Did you have a bad kingergarden techer?
"Students who had learned much more in kindergarten were more likely to go to college than students with otherwise similar backgrounds. Students who learned more were also less likely to become single parents. As adults, they were more likely to be saving for retirement. Perhaps most striking, they were earning more."

Sounds kinda like they looked at more than test scores. I am sorry you had a bad Kingergarden teacher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Salviati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. What the parent poster was complaining about was not the study referenced in the article
but the current push for education "reform" which puts high, and exclusive importance on test scores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Very interesting article- Thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC