Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House hearing returns focus to visible wounds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 01:01 PM
Original message
House hearing returns focus to visible wounds
House hearing returns focus to visible wounds
By Kelly Kennedy - Staff writer
Posted : Friday Jul 23, 2010 10:02:30 EDT

After years of hearings and debates about the “invisible wounds of war” — the traumatic brain injuries and combat stress injuries inflicted in the Iraq and Afghanistan war zones — lawmakers met Thursday to focus on the visible wounds of war, such as amputated limbs and spinal cord injuries.

Rep. Mike Michaud, D-Maine, chairman of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee’s health panel, said these injuries often are overshadowed as the media, Congress and the Veterans Affairs Department have given a higher profile to head trauma and psychological injuries.

“I like that you highlighted that in this town, you don’t hear about the other injuries,” said Thomas Zampieri, director of government relations for the Blinded Veterans Association. He said he sees other issues that need to be addressed.

For example, while VA has hired 50 new blindness rehabilitation specialists, a promised Vision Center of Excellence keeps getting pushed back, said Thomas Zampieri, director of government relations for the Blinded Veterans Association.

“I’ve been chasing the ghosts of a timeline for a long time, and I’m still not sure” when the center will become reality, Zampieri said. “The Center of Excellence is an administrative center. It’s like 4,000 feet of office space.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well fer heavens' sake!
They're all volunteers, fully informed when they sign up, and consenting to whatever happens to them. Just put the pieces back in the box, like good little Risk game tokens and forget about them. What's really important is making sure those fat defense contracts keep getting let, because that's where the good campaign contributions come from.

Okay, that's not, like, part of the official brochure or the relentless ad campaigns or anything, but it's the way it is. And if some 17- or 18-year-old isn't sufficiently curious when he or she signs on the dotted line, well, that's not really Congress' lookout, you know? If teen-agers want responsive government, they're going to have to pay to play. Otherwise, it wouldn't be fair to Halliburton or KKR or Xe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC